User talk:Alithia93/De Brazza's monkey/CLan19 Peer Review

Lead The lead is concise, but could maybe use a little more information to make it more interesting.

Content The content added is relevant to the topic. For the first sentence in the description section, maybe add a citation add the end of the sentence? The original sentence was cited in the present article. It’s great that you added the sections about reproduction and conservation. Even though this species is listed as least concern on the IUCN Red List, you could add more information about conservation efforts if there’s any. So maybe more than just a sentence. Great update! Fascinating information in the reproduction and behavior sections.

Sources and References Maybe try to find more sources / references? Try Web of Science or Google Scholar. It is fine to cite the IUCN Red List, but there should be a list of original sources that the IUCN Red List pull its information from.

Organization The content added is well-organized, and written in a clear manner.

Overall impressions The content added does improve the overall quality. Good start for a first draft!

CLan19 (talk) 14:50, 15 October 2019 (UTC)