User talk:Alizamauzy

Anonymous(group) page
Are you the one in charge of editing the anonymous information page? ANONYMOUS-USER-773 (talk) 14:27, 26 January 2019 (UTC)

Reply
No, I am not in charge. I do editing of Wikipedia for learning. Alizamauzy (talk) 02:36, 28 January 2019 (UTC)

September 2019
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Anonymous (group). Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it.  MrOllie (talk) 11:17, 24 September 2019 (UTC)

November 2019
Hello Alizamauzy. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Alizamauzy. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. MrOllie (talk) 12:28, 8 November 2019 (UTC)

November 2019
Hello Mr Ollie. It may seem you so because I made edits for anonymous group. The edits were made for it as the name of the page and website were similar. I am not involved in any sort of paid advocacy. Had it been I would have disclosed it. I removed the COI template as the page was not edited for months and it was edited by only established editors. I abode by Wikipedia terms and conditions and do not indulge myself in black hat black-hat SEO.

December 2019
Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. MrOllie (talk) 16:09, 21 December 2019 (UTC)

March 2020
Hello, I'm I dream of horses. I noticed that in this edit to Sara Bronfman, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. I dream of horses (talk) (contribs) Remember to &#123;&#123;ping&#125;&#125; me after replying off my talk page 07:00, 26 March 2020 (UTC)

August 2020
Hello Alizamauzy. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Alizamauzy. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. Feoffer (talk) 07:00, 29 August 2020 (UTC)

Reply August 2020

 * , I would like to give you a clear declaration that my editing doesn't involve contributing to Wikipedia about myself, family, friends, clients, employers, my financial and other relationships. My edits are purely made under good faith, one of the fundamental principles of Wikipedia. Please go through each and every detail of the case. Your pattern of editing clearly show's WP:VANDALISM, WP:PAID, WP:Verifiability and also shows that you have used outdated articles published before the court outcome and removed referenced content eg she was found not guilty and added sentences with no references to vandalise this page. Most of the edits are attacks on my edit for unknown reasons. It seems people are paid to revert the genuine edits made by me based on in-depth research. Aliza Mauzy 12:26, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

Problem with your custom signature
You have a custom signature set in your account preferences. A change to Wikipedia's software has made your current custom signature incompatible with the software.

The problem: Your preferences are set to interpret your custom signature as wikitext. However, your current custom signature does not contain any wikitext.

The solutions: You can reset your signature to the default, or you can fix your signature.


 * Solution 1: Reset your signature to the default:
 * Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences.
 * Uncheck the box (☑︎→☐) that says "Treat the above as wiki markup."
 * Remove anything in the text box.  (It might already be empty.)
 * Click the blue "" button at the bottom of the page. (The red "" button will reset all of your preference settings, not just the signature.)
 * Solution 2: Fix your custom signature:
 * Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences.
 * Uncheck the box (☑︎→☐) that says "Treat the above as wiki markup."
 * Click the blue "" button at the bottom of the page.

More information about custom signatures is available at Signatures. If you have followed these instructions and still want help, please leave a message at Wikipedia talk:Signatures. 18:31, 3 September 2020 (UTC)