User talk:AlizeeHisquinR

Nomination of Riskdata for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Riskdata is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Riskdata& until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 15:57, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Riskdata
Hello AlizeeHisquinR,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Riskdata for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. TheLongTone (talk) 15:57, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Riskdata for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Riskdata is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Riskdata& until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TheLongTone (talk) 16:05, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

Ways to improve Riskdata
Hi, I'm Rasimmons. AlizeeHisquinR, thanks for creating Riskdata!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. The tone of the article is not as neutral as it probably should be and reads like a business pamphlet.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. R. A. S immons Talk 15:52, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

This page should not be speedily deleted because...
It describes a financial software company with strong involvement in risk calculation methodology. The computation method has been described by various financial magazines and the position of the Resarch director at the Labex Refi shows the real commitment in mathematical finance of the company. I would like to understand why the article is not admissible while it highlights new mathematical methodologies in finance: Risk Ticker, Shock VaR and Bias Ratio. So I will be able to propose more relevant content next time.