User talk:All.labour.in.vain

Welcome
Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! ²wenty³ (talk) 18:00, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

AfD nomination of Paul Thomas Abbott
An article that you have been involved in editing, Paul Thomas Abbott, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Paul Thomas Abbott. Thank you. Ecoleetage (talk) 13:52, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

An article you created maybe deleted soon: Tools which can help you
The article you created, Paul_Thomas_Abbott maybe deleted from Wikipedia.

There is an ongoing debate about whether your article should be deleted here:
 * Articles for deletion/Paul_Thomas_Abbott.

The faster your respond, the better chance the article you created can be saved. This is because deletion debates only stay open for a few days, and the first comments are usually the most important. There are several tools and other editors who can help you keep the page from being deleted forever:
 * 1) You can list the page up for deletion on Article Rescue Squadron. If you need help listing your page, add a comment on the Article Rescue Squadron talk page.
 * 2) You can request a mentor to help explain to you all of the complex rules that editors use to get a page deleted, here: Adopt-a-User. But don't wait for a mentor to respond on the deletion page.
 * 3) When try to delete a page, veteran editors love to use a lot of rule acronyms. Don't let these acronyms intimidate you. Here is a list of your own acronyms you can use yourself: WP:Deletion debate acronyms which may support the page you created being kept. Acronyms in deletion debates are sometimes incorrectly used, or ignore rules or exceptions.
 * 4) You can merge the article into a larger or better established article on the same topic.

If your page is deleted, you still have many options available. Good luck! travb (talk) 16:44, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

Well done, my new friend

 * I am very impressed with your debating skills. I hope this episode was not stressful, and I sincerely invite you to call on me if you ever need assistance in your future editorial contributions. Be well. Ecoleetage (talk) 18:04, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
 * I love an intelligent and spirited exchange of ideas, and this was a wonderfully refreshing debate. Again, my congratulations. And I am going to head over to Amazon to see about obtaining a copy of Mr. Abbott's new book! Stay in touch and be well. Ecoleetage (talk) 18:21, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

Tower Poetry
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Tower Poetry, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://towerpoetry.org.uk/about/index.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 10:50, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

Guide to referencing
Click on "show" on the right of the orange bar to open contents.

Proposed deletion of Paul Thomas Abbott
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Paul Thomas Abbott, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Doesn't seem nearly notable enough. WP:NOTE. Seems like he is known for one poem that was simply mentioned in a mainstream media article. The award he was given has very few articles about the winners. President of your university's poetry society is not NOTE. Neither is being published in a single journal. Most of the original edits were done by a now-deleted user. And subsequent edits have been by not-logged-in-users. This in itself isn't a violation of anything, but shows that very few established editors find this article worth working with. This is an obvious violation of WP:NOTE.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Hampton (talk) 18:03, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Paul Thomas Abbott
I have nominated Paul Thomas Abbott, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Paul Thomas Abbott&. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Hampton (talk) 02:18, 10 June 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of TVF Media
A tag has been placed on TVF Media requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Peppage tlk 13:17, 27 April 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Flood (poem) for deletion
The article Flood (poem) is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Flood (poem) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. John Vandenberg (chat) 04:09, 14 January 2011 (UTC)