User talk:AllWeHaveIsTime

Hello, Crypto.farm, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place  on this page and someone will drop by to help. Red Director (talk) 02:27, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style
 * Your first article
 * Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
 * And feel free to make test edits in the sandbox.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Knowledge growth (April 10)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Knowledge growth and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Knowledge growth, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Knowledge_growth Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:AngusWOOF&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Knowledge_growth reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF ( bark  •  sniff ) 01:07, 10 April 2019 (UTC)

update 7-May-19: still a WIP, will be ready for second review from AngusWOOF within next 30 days. Thanks crypto.farm

Copyright problem: Draft:Knowledge growth
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Draft:Knowledge growth, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images from either web sites or printed works. This article appears to contain work copied from https://www.princeton.edu/~moll/KGAT.pdf and https://frankdiana.net/2018/10/31/the-growth-of-knowledge/, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.
 * Have the author release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License (CC BY-SA 3.0) by leaving a message explaining the details at Draft talk:Knowledge growth and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure they quote the exact page name, Draft:Knowledge growth, in their email. See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If you hold the copyright to the work: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Draft talk:Knowledge growth. See Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the work is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at Draft talk:Knowledge growth with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.

See Declaration of consent for all enquiries for a template of the permissions letter the copyright holder is expected to send.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at [ this temporary page]. Leave a note at Draft talk:Knowledge growth saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 20:25, 14 April 2019 (UTC)

07-MAY-19 update: I have received green light from Frank Diana to release his work, just need to ask him to forward to the submissions-en approval inbox now. I have re-worded to be less essay style, removed transition words, etc. Also added ref section at top with lots of relevant discussions/papers on the topic. Next new article for creation I will not make as text heavy right off the bat. Should be good to go soon! thanks, crypto.farm

May 2019
Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames which give the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website, I have blocked this account; please take a moment to create a new account with a username that represents only yourself as an individual and which complies with our username policy or request a change of username. You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and be aware that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of the username you choose. Additionally, If you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for your contributions to Wikipedia, you must disclose who is paying you to edit. If your username does not represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text at the bottom of your talk page. You may simply create a new account, but you may prefer to change your username to one that complies with our username policy, so that your past contributions are associated with your new username. If you would prefer to change your username, you may appeal this username block by adding the text at the bottom of your talk page. Please note that you may only request a name that is not already in use, so please check here for a listing of already taken names. Thank you. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 19:54, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

the actual content
of the website in question is at vari ance with its description here and on the sandbox page. The website in question describes itself as a "Cryptocurrency Farm" and contains product information and a link for placing orders. Which I had inferred already without actually looking.12:58, 8 May 2019 (UTC)  Dloh Cier  ekim 

final thoughts on username
Understood all, sorry for the ruckus. Now after one sleep cycle, I can see how this would be confusing to 99% of the population. Will change to a new username :)

Hello, thanks for noticing this before it got way too confusing for everyone. I have a new view on life now. Question, once new name change is approved, could you grant me access to Science Direct database, or what are the requirements? I see you are a member. When I was back in my Masters at Queen's University, it was my go to resource. Would be nice to look up the odd article now and reference. PS: you might like my new proposed username, see below, definitely check out the movie Lucy if you have not. It's kind of is similar, or the polar opposite to your username, by random coincidence. I'm not sure. Crypto.farm (talk) 18:12, 8 May 2019 (UTC)

Yes that totally makes sense. I forget how new and different things can look to an outside viewer, after spending hundreds of hours on your own website, one can get lost in how it is perceived. Thanks for the reality check. Interesting your initial guess into the website function merely based off a name, I guess if crypto = dollar then that is the way general society is heading, although one of my real purposes once I have research funding will be to build more of an open source educational based system and design firm, and not so much about retail commerce for say. I have made a promise to myself to cut back on the farming analogies as well for my own sanity. Crypto.farm (talk) 18:12, 8 May 2019 (UTC)

Recent edit to URX
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your recent edit to URX added the name of an apparently non-notable entity. In general, a person or organization added to a list should have a pre-existing article to establish notability. If you wish to create such an article, please confirm that your subject is notable according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 09:42, 6 February 2020 (UTC)