User talk:All accounts taken

Welcome!
Can you give reference where it is said that it was official? -- Vigyani talkਯੋਗਦਾਨ 06:48, 3 August 2013 (UTC)

August 2013
Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Operation Blue Star, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. S H 11:13, 3 August 2013 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Operation Blue Star, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. S H 16:46, 3 August 2013 (UTC)

Regarding the use of specific words on Operation Blue Star article
Hi, I started discussion on the talk page regarding the use of specific words in the info box. I think we should discuss this case on the one place (talk page of article) rather than talk page(s) of individual editors. Hopefully, we will find solution via WP:Consensus. Thanks Theman244 (talk) 22:32, 3 August 2013 (UTC)

UK legal rulings as sources for Sikh ethnicity
Please can you desist from reinstating your contribution at Jarnail Singh Bhindranwale. Contrary to the belief stated in your last revert, two previously uninvolved people have commented on the talk page - see here and here. Neither saw the source that you provided as being appropriate. - Sitush (talk) 10:52, 9 August 2013 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors&#32; according to your reverts at Operation Blue Star. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. S H 17:50, 9 August 2013 (UTC)