User talk:Allan1080p

October 2017
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Dishonored 2, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. ''Hi Allan1080p. Please stop changing the engine for Dishonored 2 like this. As the hidden note already states, Void doesn't have an article. As the development section notes, while based on id Tech 5, Void was heavily rewritten. It's inappropriate to say the game uses id Tech 5.'' -- ferret (talk) 17:13, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

December 2017
Please stop adding unsourced content. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Lordtobi ( &#9993; ) 11:29, 10 December 2017 (UTC) You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Gun (video game) and id Tech 3. TheBuddy92 (talk) 03:05, 27 April 2018 (UTC)
 * As I have you asked you to previously, do not add unsourced engine information to articles without source. Furthermore, Asura is an article on "a class of divine beings or power-seeking deities related to the more benevolent devas", not a game engine by Rebellion Development. Then again, per our guidelines, we do not add engines where there is no article to it. The Asura engine does not have an article. Commentlessly adding the same content on the same page after previously beign reverted can easily appear as disruptive editing. Lordtobi  ( &#9993; ) 11:43, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

id Tech 6 image
Hi Allan. There are a few problems with the image you put in id Tech 6 article. Currently that you are the owner of the image but of course this is not true, but probably you just did not know how it works. Following, you should put a in the "Licensing" section of the image, and a  in the "Summary" section, compiling all parameters and linking the id Tech 6 article in it.

One suggestion: searching on the net, I realized the image is from pre-release version of the game (January 2016), so it would be better to use a post-release image of the game using id Tech 6. Thank you. Lone Internaut (talk) 04:01, 27 November 2018 (UTC)

January 2019
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Mafia II, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Matthew hk (talk) 02:28, 29 January 2019 (UTC)