User talk:Allanlw

Mudsling
Dang! That was fast.

There never was -- or, more precisely, never was intended to be -- an article entitled "Mudsling." That would be silly.

I merely typed in something in order to bring up the prompt that enabled me to start a new article. But I'm sleep-deprived. (I should be working on a deadline -- still.) And I didn't realize at the time that I wouldn't have the option immediately of naming the article what I had intended, which was/is "Stereotpyes of Jews."

But now that's correct, and people can start complaining about the actual article. deeceevoice (talk) 08:43, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

CSD tagging of X bodrum x
Hey. While going about my duties, I noticed this tagging for speedy deletion. I changed it to A7 criteria, as I didn't think G1 applied. I just wanted to note, for future use, that A1 applies to patent nonsense, which, by Wikipedia standards, means "Pages consisting purely of incoherent text or gibberish with no meaningful content or history." It doesn't include poor writing, partisan screds, obscene remarks, vandalism, fictional material, material not in English, poorly translated material, implausible theories, or hoaxes. Some of those, however, could be considered vandalism. I re-tagged the article with A7 because I didn't believe it to be vandalism, rather a semi-biography that didn't really show it's notability. Please check over WP:CSD and review exactly what each criteria really means, and I think that will really help you (and the project) out down the road. Obviously, some could fall under multiple criteria, but I just though I would point this one out as it definitely doesn't fall under G1, as that is a very explicit one. Cheers! – Alex43223T 09:09, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

NRHP
No, problem with the NRHP notability. The more edits and oversight of the New England articles, the better! Thank you for checking out the articles. Swampyank (talk) 05:32, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

allanlw
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iO2GlDYN4a4&feature=related http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DsOE73pxpys —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.184.95.112 (talk) 22:51, 15 March 2010 (UTC) I thought you'd really like this video and decided to share it with you!

75.147.10.109 (talk) 13:26, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

Repost of Template:Memes
A tag has been placed on requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion  tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit |the page's discussion directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of recreating the page. Thank you. See Templates for deletion/Log/2009 March 23 for the prior discussion. Metropolitan90 (talk) 16:35, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:56, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 29 November 2022 (UTC)