User talk:Allareequal

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Flcelloguy 16:02, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Thank you for the welcome. --Allareequal 16:03, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)

lists of movies
Hi Allareequal, perhaps you should get some support for your lists at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Movies or just have a look ;) --MarSch 16:44, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)

creating new pages
I suggest you wait what happens to some of the pages you already created. I think they have a fair chance of being deleted. You might save all of us some time if you check your actions first at the wikiproject I refered to above. --MarSch 17:00, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Do you think they will stay or be deleted? --Allareequal 17:01, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)


 * I think some have a very good chance of being deleted. --MarSch 17:12, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)

That's not good but thank you for the tips. --Allareequal 17:13, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)


 * Try editing some existing articles, before you create a gazillion new pages. It's very enlightening and will help you get a feel for the lay of the land. --MarSch 17:48, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Here is the thing most of the stubs that are allready out there I don't know that much about them. --Allareequal 17:48, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)

villains
The correct spelling is villains not villians. --MarSch 17:11, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)

I will try to spell words correctly next time thank you. --Allareequal 17:12, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you were just trying to experiment, then use the sandbox instead. Thank you.

It is not considered vandalism. Look at what I have done that is not vandalism. The lists I have done seem fine to me. VFD if you think it's vandalism. --Allareequal 18:14, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)

The lists that you have done, while not strictly vandalism (I honestly think that you are well-intentioned, if misguided), do not belong in Wikipedia. I appreciate you taking the time, but this is non-encyclopaedic material - do you really think that others will ever need to look for movies with Hero in their title? (That's what IMDB is for) jglc | t | c 18:16, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Okay I'am breathing what can I do to help. Fix stubs seems so bland. But if thats what i got to do i will. --Allareequal 18:16, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Well, what are you interested in? It seems that you enjoy movies and video games - why don't you find some of your favourite video games or obscure movies that haven't received entries yet, and create stubs or full articles for them? Expanding stubs can be fun if there is something about which you feel passionate, but that subject has not yet received a proper treatment, or you feel you have something to add. jglc | t | c 18:18, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Warning
Stop creating inane, stupid, or otherwise speedily deletable articles. I've speedily deleted the most obnoxious ones you started, and I expect the rest will be deleted and/or redirected after going through the VFD. Lists that could concievably number into the thousands are a Bad Thing and will generally be speedily deleted, *particularly* when they're manual constructions of lists that can be generated with an SQL query. Furthermore, we almost always prefer categories to massive lists, with which they are redundant. &rarr;Raul654 18:25, Jun 15, 2005 (UTC)

Go easy on me. Jasong helped me out I don't need trouble. --Allareequal 18:26, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)


 * Don't worry; I was unsure as to your earlier behaviour, so I had Raul654 drop you a message. You're fine, now; if you have any questions or concerns whatsoever, feel free to leave a message at my User Talk page.  I'd highly suggest reading that Welcome! message left by Flcelloguy at the top of this Talk page, as it outlines pretty much exactly what should and shouldn't be added to Wikipedia; this could save you a lot of time and stress.  Best of luck, and I'm glad that you're contributing. jglc | t | c 18:29, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)

It's good to see that not everyone hopefully thinks i'am a vandal because I'am not it's just that you know Wikipedia so great and it has so much information just trying to help. I'am a little misguided so thanks jasong and everyone. I will keep doing to positive thing. --Allareequal 18:31, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)

List of fictional worms?
What is the purpose of this list? Just in case someone decides to do their PhD thesis on fictional worms and needs wikipedia to lend a hand? Please clarify. --Scimitar 19:05, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Slimey and Earthworm Jim are fictional worms. Earthworm Jim not sure. --Allareequal 19:06, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)

I know that they're fictional worms. That isn't the point. The point is- will this help anybody or is it a useless list? --Scimitar 19:22, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * I think it's a good idea for a list, like List of fictional rabbits. Kappa 20:12, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Kappa brings up a really good point. I'd say, keep. jglc | t | c 20:53, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * I'm afraid I am compelled to agree with precedent. Sorry if I came across as harsh, Allareequal. --Scimitar 21:07, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Congratulations !
It was a very good idea to start an article about fictional plants. There are a lot of lists about fictional animals, monsters, aliens, cretures, dragons etc., but none about plants. I was about to start myself an article about fictional plants, but there was already one. It is interesting that when I searched for "list of fictional plants", the Wikipedia did not wield the actual page. Maybe the article was to new. Anyway, I added some imaginary plants that I rememberred and hopefully the list will grow. We'll keep in touch. Tavilis 15:10, 11 July 2005 (UTC)

AfD nomination of List of fictional worms
List of fictional worms, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that List of fictional worms satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/List of fictional worms& and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of List of fictional worms during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Eyrian 16:13, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of List of fictional worms
I have nominated List of fictional worms, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/List of fictional worms&. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Claritas § 21:49, 12 June 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ronco


The article Ronco has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Not enough third-party reliable sources to substantiate the bulk of the article.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. causa sui (talk) 17:19, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of List of bombs


The article List of bombs has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No coherent classification; mixing types of bombs, individual bombs, and ingredients. I don't think there's room for improvement here, see the talk page comment from over 6 years ago.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Qzd (talk) 03:05, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of List of fictional plants for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of fictional plants is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of fictional plants until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. &raquo; Shadowowl  &#124;  talk  17:53, 14 September 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of List of bombs for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of bombs is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of bombs& until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Larryzhao123 (talk) 20:01, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Santa Who? for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Santa Who? is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Santa Who? until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. --Filmomusico (talk) 21:05, 14 August 2021 (UTC)