User talk:Alldaysun57

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. The submission has not been accepted because it included copyrighted information, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the [ reviewer's talk page] . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Excirial ( Contact me, Contribs ) 19:20, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/mechanical mineral conversion
Hello, Can you please explain me the reason why the article is deleted, it contains common known general information and mostly information which is based on personal experience with a pilot plant of the mentioned technology. I dont understand where it violates any copyrigths. --Alldaysun57 (talk) 12:44, 4 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Hiyas there Alldaysun57,


 * The article was removed as a copyright violation because a large section of the text in it was a literal copy of http://www.global-ecofuel.com/english/projects.html. You can use an external page as an inspiration for writing an article, but creating a word-for-word copy of a webpage text is not allowed under copyright laws. Excirial ( Contact me, Contribs ) 16:35, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

Thank you very much for your answer. Global Ecofuel Solutions SL is located in Spain, and is the company I work for. The article you have found on the webpage is personally written by me. the article I wrote for Wikipedia is based on my own article that I wrote for the webpage. Like I understood, articles on Wikipedia should explain things from a neutral point of view and should not contain any link to company or private web pages. Thats why I didn't put a link or mentioned the companies name. Of course you cannot know that the author is the same person. Do you see a way how I can prove to you this fact ? or would it for other reason still not be acceptable to have in Wikipedia something edited that exist in a similar version on another webpage ? --Alldaysun57 (talk) 17:50, 5 January 2013 (UTC)