User talk:Allegations

August 2015
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Shooting of Samuel DuBose has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 08:19, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Shooting of Samuel DuBose was changed by Allegations (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.864328 on 2015-08-01T08:19:45+00:00.

Allegations, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure!
 The Adventure

August 2015
Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Shooting of Samuel DuBose, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page.''I asked you politely to use article talk. That is what article talk is for. Repeated re-reverting is called edit warring and can result in sanctions. We don't discuss by edit summary. '' &#8213; Mandruss  &#9742;  20:11, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

3RR warning
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Shooting of Samuel DuBose. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. -  Cwobeel   (talk)  21:40, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Moved from article talk
That is a really offensive description of what happened. This is not a contest between me and you, Mandruss.

Hello. All Wikipedia content disputes are contests. If you have an argument to support your change to the lead, please make it in the article talk thread; that what it's there for. If you want to report me for misconduct, please do it at WP:ANI. I'm more than willing to discuss any personal issues with you here, within reason, provided it doesn't become an obvious waste of time for both of us. I apologize for the comments at the beginning of the thread, but try to understand how frustrating it is to always have to be the one to start a discussion thread because the other party refuses to do it. &#8213; Mandruss  &#9742;  00:48, 2 August 2015 (UTC)

Allegations: If you are interested in contributing to Wikipedia, it may be a good idea if you read WP:BRD, which explains an excellent way to handle content disputes. In my experience, it works if all involved commit to it, and saves a lot of aggravation for all involved. -  Cwobeel   (talk)  03:46, 2 August 2015 (UTC)