User talk:Allenday

Orphaned fair use image (Image:EMBL.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:EMBL.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 12:04, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:NCBI.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:NCBI.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  PxMa 00:48, 28 October 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:DDBJ.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:DDBJ.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:59, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

August 2016
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to List of chat websites has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:51, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: List of chat websites was changed by Allenday (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.973604 on 2016-08-22T00:51:56+00:00.

Redirecting Biocontaminant to Biological hazard
Hello! I saw you recently created the page Biocontaminant. I'm glad to see another editor interested in biology! After having a look at how sources uses the term "biocontaminant" online, I decided to redirect that title to Biological hazard. That article is a bit more developed, but still has lots of room for improvement. It you're interested, it would be super if you could expand upon the ecological and health hazards of biocontaminants there! If you think I've made a mistake, feel free to let me know or undo my action, and we can find a forum to ask for broader feedback. Thanks for your contribution and happy editing! Ajpolino (talk) 00:51, 23 February 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Chat-Avenue


The article Chat-Avenue has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "No secondary sourcing, nothing to suggest notability. Google search reveals only spam and reviews on non-notable websites--and one hit in a tabloid."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Drmies (talk) 18:36, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Chat-Avenue for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chat-Avenue is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Chat-Avenue until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:56, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of List of chat websites for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of chat websites, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Articles for deletion/List of chat websites until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 2 April 2024 (UTC)