User talk:Allenroyboy

Reviewer
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. -  F ASTILY  (T ALK ) 03:25, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

OrphanReferenceFixer: Help on reversion
Hi there! I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. Recently, you reverted my fix to Seventh-day Adventist Church.

If you did this because the references should be removed from the article, you have misunderstood the situation. Most likely, the article originally contained both  and one or more   referring to it. Someone then removed the  but left the , which results in a big red error in the article. I replaced one of the remaining  with a copy of the  ; I did not re-insert the reference to where it was deleted, I just replaced one of the remaining instances. What you need to do to fix it is to make sure you remove all instances of the named reference so as to not leave any big red error.

If you reverted because I made an actual mistake, please be sure to also correct any reference errors in the page so I won't come back and make the same mistake again. Also, please post an error report at User talk:AnomieBOT so my operator can fix me! If the error is so urgent that I need to be stopped, also post a message at User:AnomieBOT/shutoff/OrphanReferenceFixer. Thanks! AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:57, 5 September 2010 (UTC) If you do not wish to receive this message in the future, add  to your talk page.
 * my change had noting to do with the rescue of the link. but rather went back to fix the previous change that caused the orphaned link in the first place. Allenroyboy (talk) 18:06, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

Responce for 70 weeks additions
Hi there, You wrote something on my user page, which I responded to. I think, however, that you should have put your comment on the discussion tab of my user page, similar to here. Please move your comment over. Nossond (talk) 15:58, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

Reference list
The references (not notes) are found in the article (e.g.,1,2,3). That's the way all the other Wiki articles are. I corrected wiseman hypothesis only to have you revert the incorrect format. The books were down with the other further reading (per Supernova). Either self revert the correction or go in and correct it yourself since you've taken the interest. 174.125.75.63 (talk) 20:06, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Post fixed 174.125.75.63 (talk) 20:06, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The supernova format is somewhat out of date. the template reflist should really be called the notelist but it is too late to change.  Allenroyboy (talk) 01:10, 2 February 2011 (UTC)

Blocked?
What the .....? I go on Vaca and come back and find myself blocked as a sockpupet??

From what I have read it seems that I and other editors have used the same URLs. I access the internet using my smartphone as a wifi on a 3G net work. I have learned enough to know that each time I log in I am assigned a different URL. That means that yesterday I had a different URL than now. 5 hours ago I had a different URL. 1 hour ago I had a different URL. 5 minutes ago I had a different URL. And 1 hour from now I will have a different URL. I have no idea what my URL is or what it is going to be.

This also means that of the millions of smartphone, Iphone, Ipad, tablet, netbook, etc. userws some of them are likely to be given, at some time or another, some of the very same URLs that I have had and that I will have. I cannot be responsible for the content of other possible WP editors that access the internet using the 3G and 4G networks who may have have been randomly assigned URLs that I may have randomly been assigned also. Allenroyboy (talk) 16:48, 11 September 2011 (UTC)


 * You can appeal a block by using the instructions at WP:GAB. You may wish to view the investigation at Sockpuppet_investigations/Allenroyboy/Archive - remember the designation as a sockpuppet is not just down to IP address, checkusers can access other logged data, and investigators will also view the pages edited vs. the times of the various edits by different sockpuppets.  Ron h jones (Talk) 22:07, 11 September 2011 (UTC)

blocked?

 * I am pretty sure you mean IP address rather than URL. In any case, you were blocked for operating multiple accounts in a manner inconsistent with policy as shown at Sockpuppet investigations/Allenroyboy. The determination was based on technical and behavioral evidence, so you might want to address that in your unblock request. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 02:26, 12 September 2011 (UTC)

And they all edit the exact same topics you do? –MuZemike 03:13, 12 September 2011 (UTC)

So what.... No one else edits these topics??? That the millions of cellphone or iPad users may use the same IP address at any time seriously undermines the significance of editing the same topics.

??
Response: I have not been able to edit on WP since my account was blocked because of IP abuse by others. I just happened to try searching on WP today when I found a notice to the IP which Verizon had just assigned to me, and found that someone else had abused WP on that IP. I'm showing that this is an illustration of what happened before, where I was blocked for the actions of others. I have no control over the IP I am given. And Verizon has given me a different IP even now. It is not uncommon to have several different IPs assigned in a single day and even have IPs changed while on the internet.
 * You were not blocked because of IP abuse by others; you are blocked for abusing multiple accounts, as confirmed by checkuser at Sockpuppet investigations/Allenroyboy. --jpgordon:==( o ) 01:26, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
 * I was accused of sockpuppet because others got assigned the same Verizon IP that I had been assigned, which was out of my control. I cannot be held responsible for what others did just because they had been assigned IPs that I had also used.  Allenroyboy (talk) 18:47, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
 * This sockpuppet investigation is completely bogus!!! Others were assigned the same IPs that I had at different times.  I cannot help it if other people edit some of the same things I do. Allenroyboy (talk) 04:12, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

File:Dan7n8parallel.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Dan7n8parallel.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly hi! 19:50, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation
Tgeorgescu (talk) 20:06, 9 July 2019 (UTC)