User talk:Allgood80

June 2024
Hi Allgood80! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Charles R. Hamilton several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree&#32;at, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. ObserveOwl (chit-chat • my doings) 02:38, 1 June 2024 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Charles R. Hamilton, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 16:02, 1 June 2024 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Charles R. Hamilton, you may be blocked from editing. Gottagotospace (talk) 16:08, 1 June 2024 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Charles R. Hamilton. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 16:15, 1 June 2024 (UTC)

 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. —Smalljim 16:38, 1 June 2024 (UTC)