User talk:Allgoodalrightalright

October 2017
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Zooey Deschanel. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. sixty nine  • speak up •  00:28, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Zooey Deschanel, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. sixty nine  • speak up •  00:31, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Zooey Deschanel. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. sixty nine  • speak up •  00:38, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Drmies (talk) 00:39, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
 * I reverted you since you were obviously edit warring over BLP-sensitive material against a number of other editors, and then I saw that this was really all you were doing here, so a block was a given. If you return to this behavior after the block runs out, I have no doubt you will be blocked indefinitely. Drmies (talk) 00:43, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation
Tornado chaser (talk) 00:55, 9 October 2017 (UTC)