User talk:Allilui

April 2010
Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Luis Garcia Fanjul, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Shadowjams (talk) 19:02, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

Please stop. Continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia without resolving the problem that the template refers to may be considered vandalism. Further edits of this type may result in you being blocked from editing Wikipedia. JamesBWatson (talk) 19:09, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

Please stop. Continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia without resolving the problem that the template refers to may be considered vandalism. Further edits of this type may result in you being blocked from editing Wikipedia. this edit, as well as yet again removing maintenance templates, also introduced meaningless content. The first time I saw you had made an edit of this kind I assumed it was a mistake or a test edit, but it becomes more difficult to accept such explanations when you continue to do so. Please try to be more careful, and use the sandbox if you wish to do any test editing or experimenting. JamesBWatson (talk) 19:53, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits, such as those you made to Luis Garcia Fanjul. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ''Please stop messing up the formatting. You're not explaining what you're doing, you're not improving the article either. You've been sufficiently warned below. Please engage in some dialogue on this or you may be temporarily blocked.'' Shadowjams (talk) 22:05, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal the block by adding the text  below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. -- Cirt (talk) 23:04, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

This is the only warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Luis Garcia Fanjul, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.  caknuck °  needs to be running more often  02:55, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for disruptive editing without attempting to form consensus. Please stop. You are welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.  caknuck °  needs to be running more often  00:19, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Luisjudith.jpg
A tag has been placed on File:Luisjudith.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. GregJackP (talk) 15:57, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

June 2010
Your addition to File:Luisjudith.jpg has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. GregJackP (talk) 15:59, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Garcia-fanjul.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Garcia-fanjul.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Off2riorob (talk) 11:28, 10 June 2010 (UTC)