User talk:Allison nickerson1/sandbox

Allison's Peer Review

 * While the lead section is not difficult to understand, there seems to be too much information here and not enough sub-categories. It is overwhelming, therefore it could be strengthened if it was cut down more.
 * the structure is not well organized at all. There are no categories, therefore creating a lack of organization within the piece as well as confusion in regards to the reader.
 * The page is not well balanced. There seems to be too much importance given to the building's structure and cost and a negligence to the culture associated with the structure.
 * Overall there is no biased in the article.
 * Some of the sources are not reliable. Websites such as "flickr" are used.