User talk:Allithegr8/The Ways of White Folks/Nairmeera02 Peer Review

Peer Review
The lead section was really well done and followed all checkpoints. It is concise and gives all necessary information. The content that was added is definitely relevant to the topic. Something I would consider changing is leaving the description of "Cora Unashamed" that you put under "Contents" for the "Summary" section. This will keep that section more concise and follow the same format of the other 14 short stories listed. I think the summary you added is great and informative but also to the point. It didn't include any biased information and gave all facts objectively. I noticed that there are two "Reception" sections which was weird so maybe clarify that. The first reception section seems more tailored towards the first short story so I would retitle it to be specifically for that story. I didn't see any changes made in the references sectionfor some reason, but I think I noticed two sources that had to do with the short story you talked about there, so not sure if those were already there. All information added was cited by a source which is good. If you did take information from new sources that you included in your annotated bibliography, then make sure you include those in your "References". The information was organized well and it was easy to follow. You could maybe look into including more pictures if available of the specific short story you talked about. Overall, the edits made were good and beneficial to the page. I would look into making more edits maybe surrounding certain themes of the short story and how this ties into discrimination. You mentioned in the lead about power dynamics and racial issues, so maybe making more sections that go into detail about that would be great as well. If you expand more on what you have, than I think you're on the right track! Nairmeera02 (talk) 19:39, 29 November 2022 (UTC)