User talk:Alltheotherusernameshavealreadybeentaken

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. An edit that you recently made seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Materialscientist (talk) 00:55, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

April 2016
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at St. Louis. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.  General Ization  Talk   21:46, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at St. Louis, you may be blocked from editing.  General Ization  Talk   21:47, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at St. Louis.  General Ization  Talk   21:47, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at St. Louis shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. clpo13(talk) 21:54, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. clpo13(talk) 22:02, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

April 2016
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent disruptive editing. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. —S MALL JIM   22:03, 17 April 2016 (UTC)