User talk:AllyUnion/Archive25

Page blanking
Sorry for any confusion. I archived the page for you. Just trying to help Thedjatclubrock :) 22:06, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
 * While I applaud your efforts to keep the Wikipedia clean, I have my own methods of archiving, and would appreciate that you don't archive anything. --AllyUnion (talk) 09:49, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

O.K. I'm sorry. It said leave of absence so I was just trying to help. Sorry for any confusion. Thedjatclubrock :) 22:41, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Wikipedia:BJAODN:The Next Page Title
I've nominated Wikipedia:BJAODN:The Next Page Title, a page you created, for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:BJAODN:The Next Page Title and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:BJAODN:The Next Page Title during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.  ^ demon [omg plz] 14:18, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

Template cleanup
Hello. It seems that at some point you used a bot to create a series of calendar templates for the years 2004-2025, with multiple years for every month. Would you have any objection to me deleting the templates beyond the year 2009? Here's my logic: the templates are currently non-transcluded, and essentially orphaned. They show up in the list of untranscluded templates and I've been working hard to try to clean out the Template namespace. Along the same lines that we don't have articles for far future events, I can't see any legitimate use of a template for April 2025. If you'd prefer that I archive them in some way before deleting them, I'd be happy to oblige, but I truly believe that they don't need to be in the Template namespace. Thoughts? Cheers. --MZMcBride 01:41, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
 * I only created them so that when it came to 2025, we didn't have to make them. If you want to delete them, that's fine, because when they are needed, I suppose we can just simply restore them.  I think anything after 2009 can be subject for deletion -- so long as they can be restored at a later point. --AllyUnion (talk) 08:39, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

Classification of admins
Hi AllyUnion. Please consider adding your admin username to the growing list at Classification of admins. Best! -- Jreferee    t / c  22:55, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

Help
User:Brian0324 and Anietor continue to rollback a new paragraph I added in the article Christianity in China, and by contrast they rollback their POV. I've tagged them in their talk page, but please help me! --Xi Zhu (talk) 19:46, 18 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Sigh...there are actually at least 3 editors trying to get Xi Zhu to discuss his edits, but he just inserts them, usually as POV unsourced material. He then keeps vandalizing our user talk pages.  He's going to get blocked if he keeps doing that, and all we want to do is engage him in a discussion.  If you can get him to calm down and discuss, that would be appreciated!  Thanks.  --Anietor (talk) 20:06, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

Category bot
Hi. I found your page while look for bot that can automatically scans and moves pages from categories marked with categoryredirect to the correct category. I'm planning to run such a bot on id.wikipedia. I asked user:selket if he can share the source code, but still no answer. If I not mistake, User:NekoDaemon can also do that. Can you share the source of your bot? Thanks. (btw sorry for bad english). borgx (talk ) 14:47, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
 * The code below is for pywikipedia and is likely out of date. Additionally, I used a simple multi-threaded in python.  The code below is hereby released under the Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike Licenses, and not the GNU Free Documentation License. --AllyUnion (talk) 23:59, 29 January 2008 (UTC)


 * 1) !/usr/bin/python2.3
 * 2) -*- coding: utf-8 -*-
 * 3) Version: 1.08
 * 4) 1.07 Updated comments
 * 5) 1.08 Fixed comments
 * 6) 1.09 Sysop only
 * 7) 1.10 Point to last user edit


 * 1) import sys
 * 2) sys.exit(0)

import os, sys if (not (sys.path[0] == '')): os.chdir(sys.path[0]) del os, sys

import wikipedia, config, catlib import thread import re import time

def sysopList(site): sysoplist = [] mainPath = '/w/index.php?title=Special:Listusers&group=Sysop&limit=500' RLinkToNextPage = re.compile('&amp;offset=(.*?)&amp;.*?>next 500') sysopR = re.compile('(.*?)') thisDone = False path = mainPath while not thisDone: # this loop will run until the page could be retrieved # Try to retrieve the page until it was successfully loaded (just in case               # the server is down or overloaded) # wait for retry_idle_time minutes (growing!) between retries. retry_idle_time = 1 while True: try: txt = site.getUrl(path) except: raise print "WARNING: There was a problem retrieving sysop list. Maybe the server is down. Retrying in %d minutes..." % retry_idle_time time.sleep(retry_idle_time * 60) # Next time wait longer, but not longer than half an hour if retry_idle_time < 32: retry_idle_time *= 2 continue break matchObj = RLinkToNextPage.search(txt) if matchObj: startFromPage = matchObj.group(1) else: thisDone = True if startFromPage: path = mainPath + '&offset=' + startFromPage for item in sysopR.findall(txt): sysoplist.append(item) return sysoplist
 * 1)                               wikipedia.output(u'Getting sysop list...')
 * 2)                               print path

if __name__ == "__main__": notDone = 'The following are a list categories not acted upon by User:NekoDaemon as of :\n\n' mysite = wikipedia.getSite

sysops = sysopList(mysite) if len(sysops) == 0: sys.exit(2)

neko = catlib.Category(mysite, 'Wikipedia category redirects') cl = neko.catlist(purge = True) templateR = re.compile('', re.UNICODE) comment = '' for nekoneko in neko.subcategories: try: history = nekoneko.getVersionHistory lastuser = history[0][1]

if sysops.count(lastuser) == 1: nekopage = nekoneko.get m = templateR.match(nekopage) if m:                                       nekomove = m.group(2) comment = u'Robot: Nyaa! Categoryredirect: ' + nekoneko.aslink + ' â. Requested change by User:' + lastuser + '' articles = nekoneko.articles(recurse = 0) if len(articles) == 0: wikipedia.output(u'There are no articles in category ' + nekoneko.title) else: for article in articles: thread.start_new_thread(catlib.change_category, (article, nekoneko, nekomove, comment))

subcategories = nekoneko.subcategories(recurse = 0) if len(subcategories) == 0: wikipedia.output(u'There are no subcategories in category ' + nekoneko.title) else: for subcategory in subcategories: thread.start_new_thread(catlib.change_category, (subcategory, nekoneko, nekomove, comment)) else: notDone += '* %s (%d articles, %d subcategories)\n' % (nekoneko.title, len(nekoneko.articles(recurse = 0)), len(nekoneko.subcategories(recurse = 0))) except wikipedia.IsRedirectPage: continue except KeyboardInterrupt: raise wikipedia.Page(mysite, 'User:NekoDaemon/categoryredirect log').put(notDone, 'Robot: User:NekoDaemon (talk) contributions: Unpatrolled categories log update.')

Redirect of Dark Pokémon
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Dark Pokémon, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Dark Pokémon is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1). To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Dark Pokémon, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that '''this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here''' CSDWarnBot (talk) 17:31, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Sandbot
Is there a "master copy" for what the sandbox and, specifically, the template sandboxes get reset to? A change has been requested that would seem to require this to be altered. —Random832 16:58, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
 * I have no idea whether the Sandbot is still operating at this point. I presumed it was broken. --AllyUnion (talk) 23:12, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

NotificationBot & AFD Bot
I was going over the list of bots and noticed that &  has not edited in a very long time. Is this bot still active and if not, would you object to it being de-flagged? Please post your comments to Wikipedia_talk:Bots/Requests_for_approval since this is a rather widely-posted message.  MBisanz  talk 20:16, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

Bot activity
I was going over the list of bots and noticed that has not edited in a very long time. Is this bot still active and if not, would you object to it being de-flagged? Please post your comments to Wikipedia_talk:Bots/Requests_for_approval since this is a rather widely-posted message.  MBisanz  talk 06:46, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

Bot activity 2
I was going over the list of bots and noticed that has not edited in a very long time. Is this bot still active and if not, would you object to it being de-flagged? Please post your comments to Wikipedia_talk:Bots/Requests_for_approval since this is a rather widely-posted message.  MBisanz  talk 01:07, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

Various proposals
Just so I don't make things bad. Do you want users to respond under the proposals at Wikipedia_talk:Bots/Requests_for_approval or just at the end in their own bulleted section?  MBisanz  talk 07:36, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
 * I was trying to organize and separate out the issues with the policy and proposals into individual sections so the discussion can be broken down. Thus, when someone comes to read it, they get an immediate idea of what's going on without the complete need to look through all the discussions.  And yes, I would prefer users to respond to proposals under its own section. --AllyUnion (talk) 11:34, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

Re: BetaCommand 2 RfA
Hi -- I just read your comments on this RfA, & wanted to tell you that I believe you've stated the problem (or at least one of them) accurately & succinctly. I've worked off & on for the last few years as a contractor at a major semiconductor manufacturing corporation that you may have heard of (hint: they're a competitor with AMD), most recently supporting a set of software performance tools written by developers for developers, & what you have said is true. Although many developers do not fit in any manner the stereotype, I can attest it can be a challenge on one hand to get a developer as a user to provide a reproducable test case to troubleshoot, while on the other convincing a developer to actually fix a proven bug -- or providing crucial information for understanding what is going on in the code! (Although this was not the only problem here, which is why I'm considering commenting in this RfA.) -- llywrch (talk) 16:40, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

California photo requests now by County
I saw your name at Wikipedians/Photographers. I just spent the past few days moving all the California photo requests into County categories to make it easier for photographers to locate requests in the locations where they take photos. Please consider monitoring and adding your name to the list at Category:Wikipedia requested photographs in Los Angeles County, California as well as the other counties in Southern California. GregManninLB (talk) 21:19, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Wikifun
Wikifun, a page you created, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Wikifun and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Wikifun during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Kesh (talk) 02:56, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Cerritos City Seal (color).gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Cerritos City Seal (color).gif. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check


 * That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
 * That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. --07:55, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

VFD Bot
I've proposed the deflagging of VFD Bot here. BJ Talk 04:50, 17 June 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles Needing Copy Edit
Hello there!

I have begun a new WikiProject that has a very simple goal, to improve Wikipedia by dealing with the articles tagged for copy edit, and am wondering if you are interested. *smiles* This project is not a clone of the defunct League Of Copy Editors because we will not deal with requests for review (that is currently handled by our good friends over at Peer Review).

I expect that this will be a relaxed, happy and casual WikiProject, because participants will be able to take things at their own pace and use the project page to ask other participants for help. A handful of people have already expressed interest at the proposal page, and if you're interested, feel free to sign up at the project page itself and discuss the project at its talk page.

There are now over 4000 articles needing copy edit, and very, very few people working on them, so any help, however small, is appreciated. I am in the process of getting word out about the project, so I'm pretty sure we will be in good stead to fulfill our goals.

Cheers! - Samuel  Tan  03:35, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:28DayCalendarStartingOnMonday
A tag has been placed on Template:28DayCalendarStartingOnMonday requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (&lt;noinclude>&#123;{transclusionless}}&lt;/noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 06:00, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:28DayCalendarStartingOnSunday
A tag has been placed on Template:28DayCalendarStartingOnSunday requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (&lt;noinclude>&#123;{transclusionless}}&lt;/noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 06:00, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:29DayCalendarStartingOnMonday
A tag has been placed on Template:29DayCalendarStartingOnMonday requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (&lt;noinclude>&#123;{transclusionless}}&lt;/noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 06:00, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:29DayCalendarStartingOnSunday
A tag has been placed on Template:29DayCalendarStartingOnSunday requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (&lt;noinclude>&#123;{transclusionless}}&lt;/noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 06:00, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:29DayCalendarStartingOnTuesday
A tag has been placed on Template:29DayCalendarStartingOnTuesday requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<tt>&lt;noinclude>&#123;{transclusionless}}&lt;/noinclude></tt>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 06:00, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia Loves Art
First off, I apologize for the spam. You are receiving this message because you have indicated that you are in Southern California or interested in Southern California topics (either via category or WikiProject).

I would like to invite you to the Los Angeles edition of Wikipedia Loves Art, a photography scavenger hunt to be held at the Los Angeles County Museum of Art (LACMA) on Saturday, February 28, 2009, from 1:00 to 7:00 PM. All photos are intended for use in Wikipedia articles or on Wikimedia Commons. There will be a prize available for the person who gets the most photos on the list.

If you don't like art, why not come just to meet your fellow Wikipedians. Apparently, we haven't had a meetup in this area since June 2006!

If you are interested in attending, please add your name to Wikipedia Loves Art. Please make a note if you are traveling to the area (train or plane) and need transportation, which can probably be arranged via carpool, but we need time to coordinate. Lodging is as of right now out of scope, but we could discuss that if enough people are interested.

Thank you and I hope to see you there!  howcheng  {chat} 23:29, 9 January 2009 (UTC)


 * I'm not sure if I have the time, but I will keep this in mind. --AllyUnion (talk) 13:16, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

Welcome back.

 * Thanks! --AllyUnion (talk) 05:27, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

RFPP
Welcome back! Please use the administrator notation templates at RFPP otherwise the archive bot will not work properly. The templates are located in the blue box on the edit page. Nakon 05:43, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Cerritos City Hall 1.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Cerritos City Hall 1.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --IngerAlHaosului (talk) 08:53, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Cerritos High School.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Cerritos High School.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --IngerAlHaosului (talk) 08:53, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Cerritos Performance Center.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Cerritos Performance Center.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --IngerAlHaosului (talk) 08:54, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Chicago Skyline at Sunset 1.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Chicago Skyline at Sunset 1.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. IngerAlHaosului (talk) 09:00, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Chicago Skyline at Sunset 10.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Chicago Skyline at Sunset 10.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. IngerAlHaosului (talk) 09:01, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Chicago Skyline at Sunset 11.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Chicago Skyline at Sunset 11.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. IngerAlHaosului (talk) 09:01, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Chicago Skyline at Sunset 12.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Chicago Skyline at Sunset 12.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. IngerAlHaosului (talk) 09:01, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Chicago Skyline at Sunset 2.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Chicago Skyline at Sunset 2.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. IngerAlHaosului (talk) 09:01, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Chicago Skyline at Sunset 3.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Chicago Skyline at Sunset 3.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. IngerAlHaosului (talk) 09:01, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Chicago Skyline at Sunset 4.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Chicago Skyline at Sunset 4.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. IngerAlHaosului (talk) 09:01, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Chicago Skyline at Sunset 5.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Chicago Skyline at Sunset 5.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. IngerAlHaosului (talk) 09:01, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Chicago Skyline at Sunset 7.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Chicago Skyline at Sunset 7.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. IngerAlHaosului (talk) 09:01, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Chicago Skyline at Sunset 8.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Chicago Skyline at Sunset 8.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. IngerAlHaosului (talk) 09:01, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Chicago Skyline at Sunset 9.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Chicago Skyline at Sunset 9.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. IngerAlHaosului (talk) 09:02, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Cerritos Performance Center.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Cerritos Performance Center.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:56, 20 February 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  F ASTILY  (T ALK ) 18:56, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Cerritos High School.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Cerritos High School.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:56, 20 February 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  F ASTILY  (T ALK ) 18:56, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Cerritos City Hall 1.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Cerritos City Hall 1.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:59, 20 February 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  F ASTILY  (T ALK ) 18:59, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Los Cerritos Center Mall.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Los Cerritos Center Mall.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 13:49, 17 March 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. IngerAlHaosului (talk) 13:49, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Postvfd
Template:Postvfd has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. The Evil IP address (talk) 17:21, 16 May 2010 (UTC)

File:Chicago Skyline at Sunset.png
Hello AllyUnion, I have used this image here. Thank you. es:Usuario:Gafotas —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gafotas (talk • contribs) 14:29, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

AfD templates
Hey, AllyUnion. I messed up on templating some pages for AfD (see the first of them here) and I was wondering if you could have your bot fix them for me. Thanks, :| TelCo  NaSp  Ve :|  23:18, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Nvm, they're all going to be deleted anyway. :| TelCo  NaSp  Ve :|  23:20, 18 August 2010 (UTC)