User talk:Allyadigue

Proposed deletion of Andreas Löschel
Hello, Allyadigue. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Andreas Löschel, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Andreas Löschel to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks,

Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 09:56, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Andreas Löschel


A tag has been placed on Andreas Löschel requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.wiwi.uni-muenster.de/ceres/en/team/andreas-loeschel. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. S Philbrick (Talk)  13:12, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
 * You said here:
 * ALso, there is no copyright infringement when the person himself knows about it. It is not plagiarism when I am reproducing information that cannot be paraphrased because career, education, and publications CANNOT BE PARAPHRASED as they are the actual accomplishment of Andreas Loschel.


 * Sorry, but this is a misunderstanding of both copyright and plagiarism. Wikipedia does not permit the inclusion of material subject to full copyright; such material can be included if the copyright holder provides an explicit permission statement for the material. That statement must be included on the website or filed with OTRS and must comply with our requirements for free licenses. I can provide more details, if requested, but I haven't bothered because it is extremely rare to arrange for permissions of text (as contrasted to the image permissions which are quite common). The simple statement that the person (presumably the copyright holder) knows about it is not close to adequate. Second, it is not the case that copying career and education fail to be violations of plagiarism. It is almost always the case that they can be paraphrased (and not closely paraphrased which is still a copyright violation). A noncreative list of publications is tougher to paraphrase and typically accepted, but there are many ways to write about the career and education of an individual without using the exact words.-- S Philbrick (Talk)  16:21, 10 July 2017 (UTC)