User talk:Allykitty101

March 2014
Hello, I'm Tony Tan 98. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Irena_Sendler because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Tony Tan 98 (talk) 16:12, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Sexy and I Know It. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place " " on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Sexy and I Know It was changed by Allykitty101 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.927742 on 2014-03-15T16:38:40+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:38, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at The Walking Dead (TV series), you may be blocked from editing. Please do not add subjective information. Tony Tan 98 (talk) 16:51, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello, Allykitty101, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one of your contributions does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Tony Tan 98 &#183;  talk  04:08, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I realized that I did not explain myself really well back in March and that may have driven you away. I removed your edits only because you were adding personal opinions to articles, which is not what Wikipedia is for. If you can see this, I want to let you know that you are welcome to come back and contribute with edits (that are neutral and have sources) any time. (More information is above.) Thanks, Tony Tan 98  &#183;  talk  04:14, 14 November 2014 (UTC)