User talk:Allylyric

September 2018
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of countries and dependencies by population. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.  Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 16:28, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
 * It is rather suspicious that your account was created only half-an-hour ago and two of your three edits to date have been to support a problematic editor whose edits have been rejected by multiple editors. I strongly suspect that you are either a sockpuppet or meatpuppet created solely for this purpose. Neither sockpuppetry or meatpuppetry is permitted. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 16:33, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

Allylyric (talk) 16:44, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
 * 1) You label my edits and Noramiao’s as “disruptive” and “vandalism” because you disagree with them. You use these words, but I don’t think you know what they mean.
 * 2) I am not related to Noramiao in any way. I simply agree with his edits.
 * 3) I am aware of the rules and I am not breaking them as per 2.
 * 4) After a quick glance at your recent edits - specifically to the edit warring noticeboard - I have to conclude that you are aggressively attempting to get another editor blocked, claiming whatever you need to justify such action.
 * 5) Many would consider your own behaviour in this matter as disruptive and uncivil.


 * This only serves to confirm my suspicion. -- Aussie Legend  ( ✉ ) 16:50, 2 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Yeah, those are remarkably similar writing styles between Allylyric and Noramiao. Are you guys twins? --McSly (talk) 16:53, 2 September 2018 (UTC)


 * Be advised that you were mentioned in a report about edit warring at an article. The report is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. —C.Fred (talk) 16:51, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

C. Fred: Yes I’m aware. Aussie: Your suspicions are confirmed by whatever you need to confirm them. Your activities on Wikipedia revolve around situations like these. Run the CU (oh wait you can’t lol) Allylyric (talk) 17:02, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

Dear Allylyric, ( I allow myself to use Dear, because I am thankful).

Thank you from the bottom of my heart for supporting me and thinking that I'm correct.

I know I am correct. I was interrupted rudely to finish what I was doing, so it's EXTREMELY hard for someone to recognize that I am correct, for which I do thank you one more time.

My approach was first and to work on updating the oldest data, then to spend the time to number the list, so if someone wants to go by the ranks, to be able to do it easily. And third I was going to work on the sources.

99% of the other versions like the Spanish, French, Russian, etc. they are all numbered just like the CIA numbers each country. It's not a matter of sovereignty here.

Extremely stupid people that have no patience interrupted me. I wasted 14 hours to explain myself instead of working productively.

I'm glad that I see someone else agreeing with me, although I realize it's hard to see what I was doing while it wasn't completed yet.

I hope you looked at what I wrote on the article's talk page.

Fred told me to wait until Tuesday and I respect that. I'm happy there are bright people like you, who think I'm correct. Respectfully, Noramiao (talk) 20:16, 2 September 2018 (UTC)