User talk:Almighty phate

Welcome!
Hello, Almighty phate, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Electrolube, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Q VVERTYVS (hm?) 14:43, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Conformal Coatings Page
I spent this morning adding more information onto the Conformal coatings wikipedia page, I cited all information. you have removed all this work - yet have then made your own edit using the same information - but without the citation of the source!?? - please can you explain. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Almighty phate (talk • contribs) 14:57, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
 * The problem is that your edits did not use reliable sources. See WP:RS.  I did keep part of what you wrote for the lead, since the information was correct and non controversial.  If you would like to put your information back in, you should back up statements with reliable third party sources.  I apologize for not stating this on the talk page. I got busy and forgot I was editing there.--Asher196 (talk) 15:23, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
 * After looking into this more thoroughly, I decided to revert what I did and kept most of your edits. There is nothing really controversial added, but unbiased secondary sources are preferrable but not a requirement.  I did exclude the external links because as per WP:EL.--Asher196 (talk) 15:37, 12 June 2015 (UTC)