User talk:Aloha27/archive 3

ArbCom 2019 election voter message
On my talk page archive 1, a very long time ago I was accidentally outed by a new user. I have removed the comments and would like the comments revdelled if possible. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AAloha27%2Farchive1&type=revision&diff=929071352&oldid=760840451 Thank you for your time.  Aloha27  talk  14:22, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Taken care of by an OS. Praxidicae (talk) 15:02, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

Barra Strait Bridge is now working (after being broken for three weeks)
The Barra Strait Bridge is now operating for marine traffic (as of 2020-07-17 15:59 UTC). See you on the lake. Ken Heaton (talk) 16:50, 17 July 2020 (UTC)

Re: Yacht Club Burgee Reverting unexplained content removal (Yacht club)
Why not. I agree it's my opinion, but it's as good as yours. I had inserted the burgee of the Royal Cork Yacht Club precisely because it was the example of the burgee of the oldest yacht club in the world, if we leave the Barrachois Harbor Yacht Club, founded in 1996, why can't we put any more? Regards.--Ceppicone (talk) 16:42, 2 September 2020 (UTC) PS: Sorry for my english.
 * Answered here  Aloha27  talk  19:02, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Nobody prevents us from making the same examples in different articles, if we do not want to use the burgee of the Royal Cork Yacht Club, we could use that of a more important club, I don't know, one at random: Yacht Club Santo Stefano, founded in 1960, a small Italian representation, or something else. PS: I know but Neva Yacht Club has a very special out of the standard burgee. PPS: the infobox in Barrachois Harbour Yacht Club is incorrect. Regards.--Ceppicone (talk) 18:42, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
 * I added the burgee of Compagnia della Vela, one of the most important clubs in Europe. For any clarification we can talk about it here without problems. Thank you. Regards.--Ceppicone (talk) 15:57, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

January 2021
Hello, Aloha27, this is in response to the message you left me about my correction to "Libra". I thought the date of the foundation fo Rome is common knowledge: April 21, 753 BC. Do I really need to quote a source? If I were you, I would worry more about the inaccuracy posted about Rome being a Libra. I am a Libra, and as stated in the entry, care greatly about Justice. Hence: I corrected the mistake and it is the first time I receive what I consider negative feedback. Make the correction, or let the misstatement stand, since you seem to have the power to; it will be guidance in potential future corrections I may or may not make. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.89.107.15 (talk) 09:40, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Answered here.  Aloha27  talk  23:31, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

Warning
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Dawn Wells; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. IceFrappe (talk) 13:04, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.


 * Hehehe. Too funny. I directed the user to take it to the talk page of the article here as the issue had already been discussed. He/she hasn't taken said advice at this point in time.  Aloha27  talk  13:19, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
 * This is simply a CYA move by the editor in response to here and here  Aloha27  talk  16:24, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. IceFrappe (talk) 13:15, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Discussion and result here  Aloha27  talk  14:48, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

Editing logged out
Is this you editing logged out? If so, it might be an idea to include diffs to support your argument. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  10:38, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Nope, not me editing while logged out. I've never done that. Thanks for the heads-up! <b style="color:#2B65EC;background:#FFFFFF"> Aloha27</b>  talk  12:53, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Okay, that's vandalism then. If they do that again, I'll block them. <b style="color:#7F007F">Ritchie333</b> <sup style="color:#7F007F">(talk) <sup style="color:#7F007F">(cont)  13:13, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
 * What I find puzzling is this edit. Did the IP hijack User:HJ Mitchell's account? This IP isn't a newbie IMO, knows WAY too much about the workings of the project. <b style="color:#2B65EC;background:#FFFFFF"> Aloha27</b>  talk  13:22, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
 * No, that's just impersonating someone else. They may just be copying and pasting text; perhaps they have been blocked by Harry for vandalism from another IP, which is plausible. <b style="color:#7F007F">Ritchie333</b> <sup style="color:#7F007F">(talk) <sup style="color:#7F007F">(cont)  13:32, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

IP has been blocked for 48 hours by User:PhilKnight Have a good day. <b style="color:#2B65EC;background:#FFFFFF"> Aloha27</b>  talk  15:27, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

UAC Turbo train
You removed the correction I made about the TurboTrain rail speed record. I wish I was better at computers but I am old and don't understand the reference technique. My comment about the record belonging to TGV 001 is common knowledge. You can google it or look into wikipedia. You prefer erroneous statements on wikipedia. It is your choice, not mine. User:24.187.74.66 User talk:24.187.74.66 0732, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Replied to here. <b style="color:#9E0508;background:#FFFFFF"> Aloha27</b>  talk  12:12, 24 September 2021 (UTC)

SPI
Hi - you created Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/WP:LTA/VXFC, but I'm not clear on what's going on with it. The account you seem to be saying is the master is, a zero-edit sock of - is that the account you had in mind, or was it a different one? All you've said in the report is 'duck' - a bit more info would be helpful for anyone who isn't familiar with the original case. Thanks Girth Summit <sub style="font-family:Segoe print;color:blue;"> (blether)  17:20, 31 October 2021 (UTC)


 * Hi - just to be clear, the master you were reporting is . Please use their actual username when reporting, rather than an abbreviation or link to an LTA page, it just makes it easier for the clerks dealing with it. Looks like Blablubbs figured it out, so no more needs to be done now. Cheers  Girth Summit <sub style="font-family:Segoe print;color:blue;"> (blether)  20:20, 31 October 2021 (UTC)

New section
Why do you keep changing Chuck Yeager profile? You do not have facts correct. AT least allow the facts in addition to the hearsay you keep reposting. Victoria Yeager knows what employ she was in when she met Chuck Yeager. You don't. Name one acting gig she had in 2000. 1999 1998

Further, court records showed she also prevailed in the court case

The Ed Dwight posting is based on triple hearsay. Not one person who was there corroborates Dwight's version.

The Indian incident - Yeager was not near the plane. It was parked on the ground with no one attending.

Please explain why you keep changing it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Victoria20201 (talk • contribs) 17:19, 4 December 2021 (UTC)


 * This question was answered here. <b style="color:#9E0508;background:#FFFFFF"> Aloha27</b>  talk  18:06, 4 December 2021 (UTC)

French
I saw the edit summary here. The NWT, Nunavut and Yukon are all, according to the federal government, officially bilingual. So the French name should be in the lead. The only other one would be New Brunswick who are also officially bilingual but at a provincial level. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 06:44, 14 January 2022 (UTC)

GeoSwan SPI
Hi, Aloha27. Should I be expecting any further evidence at Sockpuppet investigations/Geo Swan? In its current state it does not have enough evidence to justify investigation. -- Tamzin  [ cetacean needed ] (she/they) 06:39, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 17
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hurricane Larry, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Joint Rescue Coordination Centre. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 17 May 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 7
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pat Connolly (announcer), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CJCH.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 7 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

✅ <b style="color:#9E0508;background:#FFFFFF"> Aloha27</b>  talk  16:00, 30 November 2022 (UTC)

tWitch
The point in putting up a "recent death" notification is to keep the information which is being added or edited accurate. Often when someone dies there will be information added by people and there's not a reason for it to be there. As for adding the heavily edited part. It is too soon to say this article is or will be "heavily edited". If it gets to 2 pages (about 80 or so edits by different (80 editors), that would qualify as heavy editing.Infactinteresting (talk) 16:16, 14 December 2022 (UTC)


 * You're not listening. It already has a tag so no, you can't put it up. Also at the time you put it up it was too early. No one cares how long you have been an editor; it's are you doing a good job or not. Infactinteresting (talk) 19:38, 14 December 2022 (UTC)


 * I believe it is you who isn't listening. I was the one who put the tag on the article with this edit. There is no doubt, none whatsoever IMO that the tag was done properly. AFAICS, it is there yet. As far as it's are you doing a "good job or not", I believe my editing history speaks for itself. Good day to you. <b style="color:#9E0508;background:#FFFFFF"> Aloha27</b>  talk  19:57, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
 * By the way you reply you seem to conveniently not operate thinking the best of other editors, contrary to assuming good faith. Further, no matter if you don't see the point I made or whether you could be possibly wrong about something. Your history doesn't speak for yourself as loudly as these few impertinent comments. No, good day to you. We're done... sincerely have a wonderful day and stop trying to infer anything about anyone. Infactinteresting (talk) 20:09, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
 * No, I had removed the tag before removing it the time after you posted it. You don't get "credit" for putting it up. The other user (prior to you) was in error too. Infactinteresting (talk) 20:11, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
 * here is the editing history of the article up to and including the edit in which I placed the recent death tag. Look at it carefully. Unless I'm completely mistaken no one else had placed said tag before I. I have also added a warning on your talk page that personal insults will not be tolerated here. I let the first one slide as is my SOP. The second? Not so much. Good day. <b style="color:#9E0508;background:#FFFFFF">  Aloha27</b>  talk  20:31, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Stop saying good day. You are outlandish. You will stop talking to me unless you apologize. You are seemingly incorrigible. User 2001:BB6:4E52:7D00:480D:BA9B:695E:ECE5 tagged the article to which you referred first. Slide on out. Infactinteresting (talk) 20:55, 14 December 2022 (UTC)

The editor has received a final warning re: personal attacks here. Find someone else's leg. Enough is enough. <b style="color:#9E0508;background:#FFFFFF"> Aloha27</b>  talk  21:00, 14 December 2022 (UTC)