User talk:Alok12804

Welcome!
Welcome to Wikipedia, Alok12804! Thank you for your contributions. I am Abhishek191288 and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Questions or type helpme at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes ( ~ ); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! &mdash; Abhishek Talk to me 14:56, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * How to write a great article

June 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from National School of Business. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. &mdash; Abhishek Talk to me 14:57, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
 * It's really nice that you have created the article, but it totally relies only on the official website. Please do add some third party reliable sources. Cheers! &mdash; Abhishek Talk to me 15:00, 3 June 2011 (UTC)

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to National School of Business, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. &mdash; Abhishek Talk to me 15:33, 3 June 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of National School of Business


A tag has been placed on National School of Business, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

G12: assembled copyvios from http://www.nsbindia.org/About_Us.asp and other pages at that domain

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Sitush (talk) 16:12, 3 June 2011 (UTC)

Your addition to National School of Business has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Sitush (talk) 16:30, 3 June 2011 (UTC)

Status and Advice
As reviewing administrator, I deleted the article for two reasons. First, copyright. If you own the material, you must explicitly license the rights to the material according to our licensing, using the CC-BY-SA and the GNU  licenses, as explained in WP:COPYRIGHT and WP:Donating copyrighted materials ; be aware that these licenses  give everyone in the world an irrevocable license to reuse and alter the material, even for commercial purposes.   Nut I do not advise doing so even if you give us permission according to WP:DCM, the tone will not be encyclopedic and the material will not be suitable. You  need to write like an encyclopedia article, not a press release--don't praise the organization, say what it does. Try to write using as few adjectives as possible.

Include only the material that would be of interest to a general reader coming across the mention of the organization and wanting the sort of information that would be found in an encyclopedia. Do not include material that would be of interest only to those associated with the organization, or to prospective students--that sort of content is considered promotional.

As a general rule, a suitable page will be best written by someone without Conflict of Interest; it's not impossible to do it properly with a conflict of interest or as a paid press agent, but it's relatively more difficult: you are automatically thinking in terms of the organization wishes to communicate to the public, but an uninvolved person will think in terms of what the public might wish to know.

If you think you can do it right according to our guidelines, do so, but expect the article to be carefully checked for objectivity.  DGG ( talk ) 22:03, 3 June 2011 (UTC)

However, if the name you have used includes or refers to the organization, you must choose another username. As explained in WP:USER, only individuals may edit. When you have a username that is or includes the name of your organization, you imply that you are editing officially, and have a superior right to edit the page. But that is not the way WP works--all editors are considered equal--and your contributions like those of any editor must be justified by sources. I'm sure you do not intend to give such impression, but that's why we have the rule. Therefore, please choose another name. On that user   page, you should say whom you are working for.

I do not want to discourage you, but to urge you to write a proper article if it is possible; if it is not yet possible, please help us by improving our other articles on related topics.