User talk:Alokagrawal8

Welcome!
Welcome to Wikipedia, Alokagrawal8! Thank you for your contributions. I am Naveenpf and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Questions or type helpme at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes ( ~ ); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian!
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * How to write a great article

Scrolling lists
Per WP:ACCESS, we do not use scrolling lists for article content. This is because some users access Wikipedia with older software/hardware, and those lists may not render on such equipment. There are a number of choices that WP makes that provide "inferior" browsing for people with more features, but we'd rather the site be as accessible to as many people as possible. Qwyrxian (talk) 04:40, 11 February 2013 (UTC)


 * But I introduced the scrolling list in only reference section and only after getting inspired from similar reference section in Economy of India article. Alok Bansal (talk) 16:39, 11 February 2013 (UTC)


 * I understand. I've now removed it from that article as well. I'm not sure who added it there, but this is a pretty solid rule on Wikipedia—we want as many people as possible to be able to access Wikipedia, even if they're using Windows 98 on a dial-up modem. It's fine that you boldly did something that you thought improved Wikipedia articles; sometimes, the end result is that such changes get reverted. Qwyrxian (talk) 05:17, 12 February 2013 (UTC)

Re: PMs
Hi Alok, I think it'll be good if we settle this properly on the article's talkpage; this'll affect not just that one article, but all prime minister-related articles. With this in mind, I'll start a fresh new thread over the weekend.

My argument: since there are sources that count Gulzarilal Nanda as the second PM and sources that don't (incl. govt sources), we editors can take a decision about this. While Nanda technically was the second PM, I think Wikipedia can look at the de facto situation of him being an interim PM and Shastri being Nehru's successor; we don't need to always go by technicalities. For example, our article about the man who is officially Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi is named Mahatma Gandhi.

As for your argument that the PMO website is the supreme source on the matter, I disagree. The PMO is a primary source, and our policy dictates that we should prefer independent sources over these.—indopug (talk) 14:42, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

Better source request for some of your uploads
Thanks for your uploads to Wikipedia. There is an issue with some of them, specifically: You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the images because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the images, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image files themselves. Please update the image descriptions with URLs that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.
 * File:Poor Economics.jpg
 * File:PlanningCommissionIndia.jpg

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 21:13, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:PlanningCommissionIndia.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:PlanningCommissionIndia.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:28, 7 January 2018 (UTC)