User talk:Alonso.zagal

November 2020
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that in this edit to Expected utility hypothesis, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 14:36, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

Puzzling edit
This edit is puzzling. You use some very odd notation, thus:
 * f < g ⇐⇒ Z Ω u(f(ω)) dP ≥ Z Ω u(g(ω)) dP

My best guess is that you meant this:
 * $$ f<g \Longleftrightarrow \int_\Omega u(f(\omega))\, dP \ge \int_\Omega u(g(\omega)\, dP. $$

However, the cited work by Li, Loomes, and Pogrebna has nothing about this. Michael Hardy (talk) 05:43, 15 September 2021 (UTC)