User talk:Alookachalo

Morè fiefdom of Jawali
Hi, I understand your concerns about the affairs of 1656. The controversy over who did what has been going on for a century now. All that is known is that Morè clan were not enthusiastic supporters of Shivaji and paid price for it. This is well sourced and therefore anything you write to promote your views should be backed by reliable sources. Thanks.Jonathansammy (talk) 22:59, 21 January 2022 (UTC)

Stop writing underated false facts which is not true and mostly twisted
Funniest part is i am from family of Chandra Rao Moré's ancestors but still i have not heard anything about it..... the historian are never visited to Maharashtra and observed the WRITTEN RECORD and other historical documents but after story of campaign against shivaji maharaj was true but murder history by shivaji was never in record and also Chandra Rao Moré's and shivaji family was not liked each other so please shut up Alookachalo (talk) 09:04, 22 January 2022 (UTC)


 * Dear Alookachalo,even if I write my own autobiography on wikipedia, it will not be acceptable because that would be considered original research which is not allowed (seeNOR).

By the way, most of the historians who wrote history of Maharashtra in 20th century were Indians and mostly maharashtrians.Even the Bengali historian, Jadunath Sarkar spoke Marathi.Although, The More clan had differences with Shivaji,however, I believe they served in Maratha armies in the next century.There is no mention of that in the page.Perhaps, you can research that and add it to the page.Thanks.Jonathansammy (talk) 17:32, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

February 2022
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Mian Muhammad Mansha have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 07:40, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Mian Muhammad Mansha was changed by Alookachalo (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.918142 on 2022-02-12T07:40:31+00:00

Hello, I'm Hatchens. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Vikram Sampath have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Hatchens (talk) 16:00, 18 February 2022 (UTC)

Hello. This is a message to let you know that you have made an edit summary that did not appear to be appropriate, civil, or otherwise constructive, and it may have been removed. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Hello, I'm Extorc. I noticed that you recently removed content from Murder of Nikita Tomar without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Extorc (talk) 14:22, 21 February 2022 (UTC) Please refrain from making abusive or otherwise inappropriate edit summaries. Your edit summary may have been removed. Please look at pages regarding Civility and Personal attacks in your spare time. Thank you. Extorc (talk) 14:49, 21 February 2022 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Murder of Nikita Tomar. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. -- Toddy1 (talk) 12:37, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Important Notice
Doug Weller talk 16:00, 2 March 2022 (UTC)