User talk:Alpoin117

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)


 * Would you be willing to agree to a 1 year WP:TBAN from all deletion related discussions and editing broadly construed? IF I agreed to unblock you, you should understand it will be on the basis of WP:ROPE, and it will be a very short length of rope at that. Any more disruption, including personal attacks on your fellow editors or violating the terms of your TBAN would likely result in an instant reblock, with very little likelihood of that being lifted. Ping me in your reply. -Ad Orientem (talk) 02:22, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Ad Orientem, I agree.
 * Per the above you have been unblocked. You are free to remove the block notice and declined unblock requests from your talk page. However, the accepted unblock request along with your agreement to the conditions I laid out, may not be removed from your talk page until your TBan has expired on March 17, 2024. Best regards... -Ad Orientem (talk) 04:09, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Thank you Dweisz94 (talk) 04:10, 17 March 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Please self revert at Self-immolation of Aaron Bushnell
Hello,

You may not be aware but the page Self-immolation of Aaron Bushnell is subject to the WP:1RR due to it being a contentious topic. You made multiple reverts of large portions of the article - please revert your edits to https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Self-immolation_of_Aaron_Bushnell&diff=prev&oldid=1210734122 in accordance with Wikipedia policy. LegalSmeagolian (talk) 03:08, 28 February 2024 (UTC)


 * None of my edits were reverts Alpoin117 (talk) 03:09, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Please read WP:RV - undoing the effect of another users edits, such as deleting information, is in fact a revert. LegalSmeagolian (talk) 03:13, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
 * This applies only to the edit where I removed the opinion of his friend, this was done as it is not relevant enough to be on Wikipedia Alpoin117 (talk) 03:15, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Yes, so please undo edits after https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Self-immolation_of_Aaron_Bushnell&diff=prev&oldid=1210734797 where you delete another users block quote and then rephrase it in a way which is disruptive and implies a judgement that isn't supported by reliable sources. LegalSmeagolian (talk) 03:19, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Where was the reliable source that it deserved a quote box? Alpoin117 (talk) 03:20, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
 * It is in the reference in that you deleted, the article specifically cites his words in their own paragraph, and the article does not frame his statements as misleading or polarizing. LegalSmeagolian (talk) 03:23, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
 * That’s pretty dangerous to consider this the criteria for deserving a quote box, generally a quote box is deserved for significant people. Alpoin117 (talk) 03:25, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
 * The quote box in itself is an atrocious attempt to misrepresent the situation so what exactly would you consider disruptive when I benefited Wikipedia by removing the box. Alpoin117 (talk) 03:23, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Readers have commented on the talk page that your edits are disruptive, I was assuming good faith by posting here, but it seems clear you seem pretty set on this. LegalSmeagolian (talk) 03:26, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
 * You've still violated 1RR regardless of your opinion. Salmoonlight (talk) 03:39, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia is not a game it’s a serious matter influencing people and if Wikipedia was as smart as good governments it would completely understand this emergency Alpoin117 (talk) 03:41, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
 * What emergency?? Salmoonlight (talk) 03:44, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

February 2024
Hello, I'm B3251. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Self-immolation of Aaron Bushnell have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. B3251 (talk) 03:26, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

ANI
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Salmoonlight (talk) 04:05, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

February 2024
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:.
 * When you were unblocked by, you were warned that . Defying that warning, you today wrote . This indefinite block is the predictable result of that personal attack. There are several other aggravating factors like repeated recent POV pushing as well. Cullen328 (talk) 05:16, 28 February 2024 (UTC)


 * I understand. Wikipedia has a greater influence than many countries, it should own up to the accountability, this situation now should clearly be reviewed to understand who was who in this situation and actually own up to the influence you are doing in the world not only as “just some website” but appropriate judgement calls to current events in order to prohibit people like that of which I’ve insulted, you shouldn’t coward out of the responsibility of those alike your level of influence not to make the appropriate calls of guiding society. Alpoin117 (talk) 05:21, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
 * The world becomes a sad joke because of online platforms of great influence but no actual accountability for the society. Alpoin117 (talk) 05:25, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Your barely coherent ramblings are of no interest to me. You violated your unblock conditions. Your talk page access has now been revoked. Please read WP:UTRS for your options going foward. Cullen328 (talk) 05:38, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

is declined. --Yamla (talk) 16:05, 24 April 2024 (UTC)