User talk:Alps 80206

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the [ reviewer's talk page] . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get | live chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! MatthewVanitas (talk) 19:26, 23 October 2012 (UTC)


 * A couple of us left you helpful comments at the top of your article; this has definite potential, just has some formatting/sourcing issues to clean up. Please let us know if you have any questions, or better yet post the questions at the WikiProject I suggest on the draft page. MatthewVanitas (talk) 21:40, 23 October 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Granville Fuller House, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation. Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! MatthewVanitas (talk) 17:41, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.


 * Greetings, your article has published, but it turns out a chunk of it was taken directly from the YourHub site, which is a copyright violation. I've removed that part for now, but I encourage you to add material describing the building, but do it in a responsible way. Note that this doesn't mean just changing the wording slightly, but means digesting and processing the material to present it in your own words. A great read for how to do this right is at PARAPHRASE. You can always check in with Teahouse/Questions if you need advice. Hope this helps, MatthewVanitas (talk) 00:53, 25 October 2012 (UTC)