User talk:AltaicNPOV

You have been blocked
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for persistent disruptive editing, as you did at Altaic languages. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Tiptoety talk 05:13, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Additionally, please see warning issued to your IP. Tiptoety  talk 05:14, 6 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Please see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Altaic_languages_Warring, and unblock me. Thank you. AltaicNPOV (talk) 05:18, 6 April 2013 (UTC)AltaicNPOV


 * You will need to follow the unblock request procedures described in the block message. Thank you, Tiptoety  talk 05:20, 6 April 2013 (UTC)

You may find it more helpful to rewrite your appeal based on the guidance at Guide to appealing blocks, or at least expand it based upon what you read there. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom  05:27, 6 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Is that a rejection of the unblock? The Admin discussion page reference that I gave explains the complex situation better than I could in a template tag. The fact that I am engaging in reporting an Admin referral shows I am trying to be constructive, and the fact that I am in the middle of trying to participate in an Admin referral shows that I need to be unblocked to do so. In fact I haven't been able to complete notifying the editors I complain about with "subst:ANI-notice" as I am supposed to. AltaicNPOV (talk) 05:54, 6 April 2013 (UTC)AltaicNPOV


 * no it is not a rejection. I am not an admin and cannot accept or reject an unblock request. But I have seen enough requests and the results that I would be willing to place large bets on the results of the request as you initially made it. If you think your request is one that meets the guidelines set out, then feel free to ignore my suggestion. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom  06:03, 6 April 2013 (UTC)

Thanks. I'm not particularly concerned -- will just come back tomorrow.
 * the thing is, that if you come back tomorrow and edit like you have been, the result will be another block. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom  06:31, 6 April 2013 (UTC)

The article is locked and referred to administration. Out of my hands... AltaicNPOV (talk) 08:12, 6 April 2013 (UTC)AltaicNPOV


 * I have extended your block to 1 week for socking and block evasion - first as and then as, despite my earlier warning. If it happens again, I will extend your block to indefinite. GiantSnowman 11:45, 6 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Block evasion appears to be continuing at . Singularity42 (talk) 18:32, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
 * New IP blocked & tagged, and this account is now blocked indefinite - see new section below. GiantSnowman 18:38, 6 April 2013 (UTC)

Indefinite block
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. GiantSnowman 18:37, 6 April 2013 (UTC)

Appeal of Indefinite Block
98.180.5.93 (talk) 05:28, 8 April 2013 (UTC)AltaicNPOV