User talk:AltecLanz25

Welcome!
Hello, AltecLanz25, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:


 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 11:59, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright
Hello AltecLanz25, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Tacurong have been removed, as they appear to have added copyrighted material without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues here.


 * You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
 * Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
 * Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Copyrights. You may also want to review Copy-paste.
 * If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Donating copyrighted materials.
 * In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
 * Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Translation. See also Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Apparition11 Complaints/ Mistakes 12:00, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

May 2018
Hello, I'm Thelost byte. I noticed that you recently removed content from Tacurong without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Thelost byte (talk) 15:35, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Tacurong, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you.  P 1 9 9  ✉ 15:40, 31 May 2018 (UTC)


 * Are your from tacurong? Or are you trying to destroy the image of tacurong. AltecLanz25 (talk) 15:47, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

May 2018
Your recent editing history at Tacurong shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Thelost byte (talk) 15:54, 31 May 2018 (UTC)


 * Then delete tacurong from wikipedia. I am editing because i am from here. Well mostly content in wiki any way are not legit source. Bye AltecLanz25 (talk) 16:02, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
 * I understand you might be from the place but in order to enhance uniformity and 'factualness' of the article, Wikipedia requires information that is publicly available and can be verified by anyone. If you can cite a source that shows this, your edits will be maintained.Thelost byte (talk) 16:25, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

Edit Warring
Hi , ^This might also concern Appreciate your comments on the article Tacurong unfortunately as I and have noted, you're removing a great deal of content from the article space without prior consensus that should happen on the talk page. Read more here WP:Content_Removal. This is not to mean that you're wrong, it is felt that information about the bombings in Tacurong is vital to the article. Kindly try not to revert the edits made until they have been justified. You can do this in the article's talk page and when making your edits next time round, add the comment that it's been discussed in the article talk page. ' I have added a discussion there that you can comment on to validate you content removal, as of the moment, your blanking of content will be reverted until a discussion on bombings in Tacurong has been finalised and agreed on. If you revert my edits, I will be forced to seek administrator intervention as this will constitute WP:Edit_Warring. Don't forget top sign of on any replies with  Thelost byte (talk) 16:18, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

Your edit summary said: "No exact data on Tacurong having the highest bomb accident in region 12. Please correct your source. 2 to 3 incident is enough to protect the reputation and tourism of the city. What you are doing is promoting anti tourism to the city." You have to realize that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a tourism or promotional site, see WP:NOTPROMOTION. That is why all factual events get reported, good or bad. As for the claim in the article that "Tacurong City has the most number of bombing incidents in Southern Philippines since 2000", it is already marked with "citation needed" tag. If no citation is provided within a month or so, then you can remove this unsubstantiated statement, and only this statement, not other properly referenced material. Regards, --  P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:41, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

Bias
So what about other cities who has the same incidents. You didnt put ang necesaary information in their page. You are bias. AltecLanz25 (talk) 03:33, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes, it is indeed missing from other cities. But there are 5.6 million articles on WP, so I may not have time to do this. Feel free to add any info where necessary (along with reliable sources). Thanks. --  P 1 9 9  ✉ 14:29, 1 June 2018 (UTC)