User talk:Altenmaeren

Welcome!
Hello, Altenmaeren, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful: Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or and a volunteer will visit you here shortly. Again, welcome!
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

Thank you for improvements, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:51, 12 November 2014 (UTC)



DYK for Barbara Newman
&mdash; Coffee //  have a cup  //  beans  // 12:02, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Precious
  muget ir nu wunder hœren sagen

Thank you, user interested in medieval mysticism and translation studies on a scientific basis, for quality articles such as Barbara Newman, for and, for quoting "muget ir nu wunder hœren sagen", - you are an awesome Wikipedian!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:20, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

Thank you Altenmaeren for your help and constructive feedback concerning Mark Dooley's page. AlexandraSl — Preceding undated comment added 11:32, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

Five years ago, you were recipient no. 1178 of Precious, a prize of QAI! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:26, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

Mark Dooley...
...still reads like a resume. I'm pruning it some. Drmies (talk) 20:02, 6 August 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Odyssey Opera
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

Beowulf
Hey Altenmaeren, I said "a" date of composition because the very notion of "composition" with a date on it is just a difficult/different notion in OE poetry, or indeed in any oral poetry. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 19:07, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Ah, sorry Drmies, I think I hastily misread how that phrasing went - my apologies! Altenmaeren (talk) 19:16, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
 * No no, don't go changing it back or something like that--rather, help me figure out how we can say this better. Obviously my phrasing didn't work for you, so it may need tweaking. And in a single sentence...not an easy thing to do. If I were in class (and I just got done teaching Beowulf ten minutes ago) I would use air quotes for "composition". Drmies (talk) 19:18, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

On "minor" edits
Hi there and thanks for your work on the Avital Ronell entry! I wanted to give you a head's up that edits should only be marked "minor" if they could never be the subject of a dispute. So, fixing typos, italicizing a book title if someone forgot, that sort of thing. Otherwise err on the side of leaving them as regular ("major") edits--the reason it matters is that some editors filter their watchlist to exclude minor edits, trusting that a change marked minor requires no review. So it's an important point of community trust. Thanks much. Innisfree987 (talk) 18:01, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Thank you! That's a really good point, and I'll definitely err towards leaving things non-minor in the future. My bad! Altenmaeren (talk) 18:03, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

Beowulf edit
Hi, I have reverted your revision from yesterday (6 October 2019) as the old version, which said the manuscript "was produced between 975 and 1025" was correct based on the reference to Colin Chase's The dating of Beowulf (1997). If you want to add information from another source you need to add a reference. TSventon (talk) 08:33, 7 October 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 8
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Anamudi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tamil. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 8 September 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Altenmaeren. Thank you for your work on Morris Eaves. Moriwen, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. Please remember to sign your reply with ~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

— Moriwen (talk) 17:35, 29 February 2024 (UTC)


 * Thanks! I'll look for more sources to make the notability more clear. I was under the impression, perhaps from long ago, that full professorship at a research university was itself sufficient notability -- that is to say, because the tenure and promotion process establishes the importance of scholarship even in areas that may seem niche to an outsider, wikipedians ought to trust the judgment of the university committees that granted promoted him to tenure and to Full. Is my memory on this mistaken? Thanks for taking a look! Altenmaeren (talk) 17:41, 29 February 2024 (UTC)


 * That doesn't seem like a crazy argument but I don't think I see it reflected in WP:PROF, so I'm gonna guess it's one of those things that's changed over time.
 * (BTW, (a) thanks for being the nicest person I've interacted with on new page review, (b) love your work on medieval mysticism!)— Moriwen (talk) 18:00, 29 February 2024 (UTC)


 * Ah, these things of course aren't set in stone - I should keep up with them a bit better I think! Thank goodness the endowed chair made the task easier (and always nice to celebrate a donor, I guess). Oh wow, thank you, I suppose it's always easier to be grumpy online as opposed to in person. Trying to assume good faith as regularly as I can! and super glad to hope that you find the various mystic pages I've worked on the most look a bit better than they did when I first came across them! Altenmaeren (talk) 19:35, 29 February 2024 (UTC)

Precious anniversary
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:31, 8 April 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Altenmaeren. Thank you for your work on Kenneth Gross (scholar). North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. Please remember to sign your reply with ~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 18:42, 16 April 2024 (UTC)