User talk:Altenmann////

Richard Carrier
You asked for more information on Carrier. I left a reply because I have been doing some research on him recently for my own book on the unscholarly methods used by CMT proponents. Unfortunately it got reverted as Jeppiz apparently thought I was René Salm. I'm not, and I wasn't flattered by the comparison, but it did have the mildly amusing side-effect of getting Salm blocked for a further two weeks by an administrator when for once he had done nothing wrong (ironic, when you look at his history and see how much he's got away with in the past). However, in case it is of any use, I reproduce my comment below:


 * With regard to Carrier: what I am about to say is original research for a forthcoming book of my own so it obviously cannot be used in the article (before anyone asks, the book is probably several years from publication so can't be used here either). However, I thought it might come in handy for the discussion. There are reviews of Carrier's first book Proving History, but not in academic journals because it is so awesomely bad (Carrier claimed it survived peer review, which would be surprising for several reasons, but for the moment we'll take his word for it and assume the reviewers were having a bad day). The only quasi-academic critiques I know of are in Maurice Casey's book, and a series of reviews on R. Joseph Hoffman's blog, which although by scholars normally fails WP:RS. His treatment of Bayes Theorem was also effectually demolished in another field, cosmology, by physicist Luke Barnes, but that is again on a blog and not an RS as WP defines the term. I do know however of one academic review of his second book, but as it's by fellow self-published dogmatic mythicist Raphael Lataster, it doesn't exactly enhance Carrier's credibility to any great degree.
 * The problem in this particular case appears to be that Carrier is not trained in the proper application of Bayes Theorem (challenged on this point for details on where and when he received his training, he simply asserts he has it and anyone who expresses doubts about this will be sued for libel). In fact, the likeliest explanation is that he received a basic, low-level training in it while in the US Coastguard, where it is used by sonar operators to calculate what it is they have found. He was, however, in need of some way to justify his historical theories (which have always, on any subject, tended to be either fringe theories or so tendentiously put that they might as well be fiction novels) and this is what he came up with. He also tends to claim vast expertise in areas where he has no training and limited technical expertise (e.g. mathematics, German, archaeology, medieval palaeography). As a result, he's not taken terribly seriously in pretty much any field he's looked at and it's rather telling that the only piece of work he has ever written that has undoubtedly survived sustained critical examination, his doctoral thesis, has never been published. Bart Ehrman's smackdown of him veered from the slightly patronising to the extremely funny, and that is how most professional scholars see him.
 * That leaves a dilemma with regard to putting him in. If the article is to be about those proponents of the CMT with scholarly credentials, he belongs there. If it is about those works which are mainstream and taken seriously by actual scholars and have clear impact, he may not. However, that is a judgement call and that in itself raises questions.

Hope that is useful.109.156.158.20 (talk) 13:47, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

Amber Room
Hey there mate. I have re-added the image you removed from the article because: that part of the article describes a great deal about the Battle of Konigsberg and events related to Königsberg, so having a picture like that is not irrelevant. If you still disagree, I suggest we take to the talk page and get in the input of a neutral, third party. Regards, Jonas Vinther (speak to me!) 15:06, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
 * The GA-review has begun so I'm just gonna drop the issue totally for the sake of the article. Jonas Vinther (speak to me!) 21:34, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 22
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Riddle joke, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Hovhannes and Karapetyan. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

Galloping off
Altenmann, saw your RM for gallop. Curious if you have a sandbox going or not. I have long thought about doing some work on the multiple articles surrounding the canter and gallop in the horse. Saw your tags at canter, tossed most of them because one biggie at the top should cover it. There is some argument made that the canter (also called a lope) and gallop are slightly different gaits due to the 3- and 4-beats that distinguish them, but at any rate, if you have the motivation to work on this, I'd be interested in a collaboration. I threw up my hands years ago after dealing with a tendentious (and now blocked) editor, but there are spinoffs that should be consolidated and so on. Anyhow, you have my interest and it would be GREAT to do an article improvement drive on these. Montanabw (talk) 05:57, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

If interested, here is everything related that I know of:
 * 1) Horse_gait
 * 2) Canter (FWIW, we also have trot and jumping (horse) as well as ambling )
 * 3) Lead (leg) (may be sufficiently complex to keep separate, not sure)

"Original research"
Seeing as you revert that edit, I would like to see a thorough explanation of how there was one bit of original research in my heavily-sourced edits. Zozs (talk) 15:50, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
 * I don't have time right now. The key is your statement "The term Marxist-Leninist state is appropriate to describe a USSR-style state.". The rest is your WP:SYNTH to substantiate this theory. "Communist state", while a misnomer (communism is defined as stateless society), is a long established term based on the definition "state ruled by communist party". -M.Altenmann >t 16:32, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Source about Marxism-Leninist state referring to USSR-style state: The Poverty of Communism. Nicholas Eberstadt. Page 2. Sources about the USSR being a Marxist-Leninist state: Historical Dictionary of Socialism. James C. Docherty, Peter Lamb. Page 85., Ideology, Interests, and Identity. Stephen H. Hanson. Page 14. The Fine Line between the Enforcement of Human Rights Agreements and the Violation of National Sovereignity: The Case of Soviet Dissidents]. Jennifer Noe Pahre. Page 336. Pages 336, 348., Leninist National Policy: Solution to the "National Question"?. Walker Connor. Page 31..
 * Nothing dealing with the term "Communist state" is removed. Where is SYNTH? Zozs (talk) 17:36, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 1
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Jew's harp
 * added a link pointing to Altai


 * Katyusha rocket launcher
 * added a link pointing to Rudnya


 * Kravchenko
 * added a link pointing to Andrei Kravchenko


 * Last Address
 * added a link pointing to Repressions in the Soviet Union


 * Refusenik
 * added a link pointing to Social parasitism

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 11
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Borysenko
 * added a link pointing to Boris


 * Borysyuk
 * added a link pointing to Boris

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

Adamchik
Mikka, this, that, whatevs; but I should note this is not the Polish Wikipedia where everyone knows how to spell Polish names (I, for one, have no idea). Pretty sure most of our readers have no clue either. Don't you have something that could pass as a source for this? The source I used does, by the way, state that the Ukrainian and Belarusian "Adamovych" is identical to Polish (whatever that's supposed to mean); I didn't include that bit largely because I had no source for the actual Polish spelling.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); March 13, 2015 ; 12:20 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Perspective (cognitive)


The article Perspective (cognitive) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Multiple issues tagged since 2012, unreferenced since 2004.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dweller (talk) 16:54, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

Tailor
Do you have any suggestions for a new template name consisting of cloth making and textile related occupational surnames? --Kiwi (talk) 15:25, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Please read the 'Rationale' section in the tailor-surname documentation carefully. If you want a template with multiple, different occupations, then you probably better start thinking about writing an article Cloth-making in occupational surnames, if you can find good sources. -M.Altenmann >t 15:37, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
 * BTW I forgot to thank you for joining this templating effort I started some time ago. -M.Altenmann >t 04:22, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Cegléd water jug
Hello! Your submission of Cegléd water jug at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 01:01, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 30
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Charleston (dance), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Black Bottom. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

Kievan Rus'
I noticed the revert in Kievan Rus'. Could you please check this conversation. Marcocapelle (talk) 04:01, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Cegléd water jug
— Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:02, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 6
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Soviet Empire, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Metropolitan state. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

1867 Russian Empire and 1945 Soviet Union
That orthographic depiction of mine for Greater Russia and Eurasianism is accurate. Check out the wiki on the Russian Empire, which shows the territories under its sphere of influence. That includes Mongolia.

Territorially I just combined the maximum territories and near abroad of the former Russian Empire and Soviet Union, minus Alaska. The near abroad is a combination of the former's sphere of influence and the Warsaw Pact (plus Mongolia of the People's Republic era). Kjk2.1 (talk) 01:38, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

Vaenga
Thanks again for your recent help with the above on the WikiProject Russia talk page; I wonder if I might pester you with a question, as I can't read Russian? While attempting to update the history section of the Severomorsk article, I found The historical information of the Severomorsk city which says that "April, 18, 1951 the working settlement Vaenga has received the new status and a new name city of Severomorsk. There were many opinions concerning the name: КKrasnoflotsk, Safonovsk, Krasnogvardeisk. Became deciding P.Zadorozhnogo's offer: the defenders of Murmansk region within Great Domestic war named themselves with 'Severomorci'." Is there any meaningful way of translating 'Severomorci' into English? Alansplodge (talk) 20:30, 8 April 2015 (UTC)
 * First of all, I have to warn you that this page is a machine translation of this Russian text, so if you want to use something from there, you should (A) use the latter one as a footnote and (B) let me know so that I double-check the Runglish. For example, "Great Domestic war" is the Great Patriotic War, and many funny things more. Now, Severomortsy (североморцы); literally this means "northern-seamen" and was an informal reference for personnel of the Northern Fleet (not only seamen/Navy, but also aviators, etc.) -M.Altenmann >t 03:14, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks for that, it makes sense now. I was thinking of a brief "Toponomy" section - Vaenga being derived from Sami etc. I had recognised the machine translation and was fairly certain that I had deduced the correct meaning, but would be very grateful if you could double check my work. Alansplodge (talk) 12:48, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

Incomplete DYK nomination
Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Bug River property at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; see step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with db-g7, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 07:30, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

два Крым
Любовница Путина разговаривает с подругой: — Я попросила крем, а он услышал Крым. Не смею попросить коляску… I'm only asking for an allowance for two views, not два Крым! Scott P. (talk) 19:27, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

PS I don't speak Russian but my Google Translate program does...Scott P. (talk) 19:27, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
 * I don't speak idiomatic English, so I fail to grasp your comment. Since you dont' speak Russian, but have Googe, I guess you got the pun крем/Крым, but probably коляску=wheelchair/pram was unclear: In Russian коляска rhymes with Aляска = Alyaska. Now, can you return me a favor and explain your joke? -M.Altenmann >t 19:38, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

(See NPOV:Talk. Scott P. (talk) 19:34, 25 April 2015 (UTC)


 * OK. I tried.  Here is my explanation.... So Putin mistook Crimea for cream.   I didn't ask for anything so big as the conquering of a province, I only asked for an allowance of a second opinion.  I guess my Google/ Russian isn't as funny as I thought.....  sorry. Scott P. (talk) 19:46, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
 * I see. Your joke was lost on me, because you delivered it in two pieces, apart in time. I was answering only seeing the first one. Now that I saw both, I got it. -M.Altenmann >t 19:54, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Next time I will stick with English. Scott P. (talk) 19:48, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
 * No, no. Your Russian is OK. Just try to save your messages only in a final form. -M.Altenmann >t 19:54, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
 * I did think that joke about Putin translated pretty good into English though...Scott P. (talk) 19:51, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Huh? What about the second part, where Google translated коляску=wheelchair? Or there is another English pun I am not aware of? -M.Altenmann >t 19:54, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
 * My version of Google Translate (on my iPad) did a slightly better job, it translated коляску to the word "carriage", which I assumed meant "car", no? Obviously "wheelchair", would have been a bit more of a "stretch". : ) Scott P. (talk) 20:40, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
 * LMAO! I now know where Russo-Ukrainian relations keep going wrong! They have babies translating and texting each other. Uk-"You wanna make a big deal of this?". Ru-"Yeah!". Uk-"Yeah? Meet you on the border in an hour ("через годину")." Ru-"We'll be there in a year ("через год") waiting for you, if you need to take that long to get your arses together!"... Uk-"You didn't show! Bloody typical Russian cheats and liars!". Moral of the story: Have pram: will make trouble. --Iryna Harpy (talk) 04:57, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 26
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Usein Bodaninsky, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Crimean Tatar. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:50, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Category:Historical cities and towns in Russia
Category:Historical cities and towns in Russia, which you created, has been nominated for deletion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 02:12, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Pakistan occupied Kashmir


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that Pakistan occupied Kashmir, a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It is unambiguous vandalism or an obvious hoax. (See section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please do not introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia; doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  Human 3015  Say Hey!! • 07:00, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

Redirect
Given that one of your redirects was nominated, you might want to take a look at this and voice your opinion about the applicability of G3 criterion to these redirects.  Mar4d  ( talk ) 14:48, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Bug River property
Harrias talk 07:01, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in.
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!

This might be of interest to you since the discussion about the question of Rosaline's inclusion in the Unseen character article has included discussing the description and citation history of the description from that page. 99.192.70.142 (talk) 17:06, 2 June 2015 (UTC) (=99.192.92.80)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EDWinXP (2nd nomination)
FYI - since you've previously edited the article. Bazj (talk) 11:47, 6 June 2015 (UTC)

NKVD Camps
Hello, I plan to go to the New York Public Library to view InIstrumentalisierung, Verdrängung, Aufarbeitung: die sowjetischen Speziallager in der gesellschaftlichen Wahrnehmung 1945 bis heute Let me know if you have any questions--Woogie10w (talk) 11:47, 10 June 2015 (UTC) i see this book is about soviet camps. since you are a wikipedian, i believe you know what to do. today it is not that interesting to simply repeat that the soviets were schlimm und boshaft und schlecht, they oppressed, repressed, killed, etc. we know that already. it us more useful to know what and how specifically they did.

west zones had their own internment camps for nazis. but they did quick denazification and mostly shut them down in a couple of years. (btw this info is missing or not easy to find in wikipedia, so i'd suggest to look for info and leads in this direction) so the comparison with soviet ones would be useful. e.g. i suspect nkvd camps were more populous, and simply source of free labor. -M.Altenmann >t 15:36, 10 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Ok I will report back after I see the book.--Woogie10w (talk) 15:42, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

I have provided new information and therefore wonder whether or not you still support a certain move
Hi! You voted to support Talk:Comparison of Q&A sites before I made my comment of 15:38, 16 June 2015. That comment completely refutes the nominator's original move rationale. Now that I've made that comment, do you still support the move? Cheers, —Unforgettableid (talk) 16:00, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

RfC: Religion in infoboxes of nations
There is an RfC that you may be interested in at Template talk:Infobox country. Please join us and help us to determine consensus on this issue. --Guy Macon (talk) 14:28, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

DABs and references
Re. I must admit I was hesitant to remove the template, because [ideally] 100% of all content should be referenced and the first sentence looks very much like content. However, WP:D3 actually says "Disambiguation pages are not articles – they are navigation aids! ... Don't include references or external links."

How I understand this is that DABs should only list "obvious" information from the main articles where the content should be referenced. But since there's no entry for the first sentence, there's no "obvious" page to copy the content from. Maybe we could create an entry on Wiktionary and use that? WP:IAR until there is such page? Change WP:D3? Thought? Cheers, 83.226.255.86 (talk) 14:32, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
 * . In fact, I was not reading the article text carefully (tl;dr :-) I hope I fixed it for good now. -M.Altenmann >t 15:08, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
 * ...and I did not see the Kalpak page. Thank you for taking care of this, the DAB looks much better now :) 83.226.255.86 (talk) 15:13, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

Pardew Shuffle listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Pardew Shuffle. Since you had some involvement with the Pardew Shuffle redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼  04:20, 27 June 2015 (UTC)

Swanee Shuffle listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Swanee Shuffle. Since you had some involvement with the Swanee Shuffle redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼  04:20, 27 June 2015 (UTC)

"Vatnik"
Can you please stop "protecting" the article? It is getting utterly frustrating to want to edit anything at all with the likes of your contributions around. I do not know how long you have been in WP, but just a friendly reminder: it takes less than a minute to actually vandalize an article, and more than an hour to carefully rewrite parts of it. Articles like Vatnik (slang) cannot always be backed up by sources. Nobody will specifically define the meanings, moreover, no article exists on the word "bydlo", which is important to understand where "vatnik" comes from. I'm both compelled to laugh and to cry when I see a page on WP trying to make sense while encyclopedias like ED and Lurkmore actually explain the term better, without all Ukrainian sources somewhat being "okay" over what you outrageously proclaim "OR". TY --Whydoesitfeelsogood (talk) 15:03, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia has rules and these rules are protected. Please learn them and then we shall talk. -M.Altenmann >t 15:07, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I don't know why I'm here. Every time I quit, because of stupid interwiki I keep coming back =) --Whydoesitfeelsogood (talk) 15:10, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Please keep in mind that different language wikipedias have different policies. -M.Altenmann >t 15:14, 27 June 2015 (UTC)

By the way, it is entirely possible to write a really decent article about 'vatnik' using good references. It is that I don't have time. -M.Altenmann >t 15:16, 27 June 2015 (UTC)

Rousset (surname)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Rousset (surname), and it appears to include material copied directly from http://dictionary.sensagent.com/rousset/en-en/.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 03:16, 3 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Hi. :) Please remember when splitting content to follow the processes set out at Copying within Wikipedia. Creativity is low in disambiguation pages, but the descriptors of people is likely sufficient to qualify, and attribution is cheap. :) I've supplied it for this one. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:16, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

Deletions in Kievan Rus' Article
Hello, you recently deleted an image in the article Kievan Rus' without giving any reason: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Alex_K_Kievan_Rus..svg

English: Coat of arms of the Kievan Rus 10th-11th c. Русский: Эмблема Киевской Руси 10-11 ст. Українська: Емблема Київської Русі 10-11 ст.

As you can see in the link, the image that was added as well as its description were all referenced by simply clicking on the image itself. This image is the appropriate image for the article Kievan Rus', was fully referenced, and did not need to be deleted.

In addition, you also made some changes which re-order Russia to appear before Ukraine in multiple places in the article. This would be strange to users, as Kiev is in Ukraine and not Russia. Although Muscovy subsequently renamed itself to Russia in the 18th century in order to adopt the history of Kievan Rus', and Ukraine in the 20th century renamed itself from Ruthenia ("Rus" in Ukrainian) to Ukraine, Russia should not appear before Ukraine simply because the current name of Muscovy is similar to Rus', especially given the circumstances of the name change.
 * (1)This not the coat of the arms of Kievan Rus. This is modern drawing, as you may find out "by simply clicking on the image itself"
 * (2) Wikipedia is not a pissing contest. The countries are ordered alphabetically. Belarus is listed first not because it is the most favorite descendant of Kievan Rus. -M.Altenmann >t 15:05, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
 * (2) Wikipedia is not a pissing contest. The countries are ordered alphabetically. Belarus is listed first not because it is the most favorite descendant of Kievan Rus. -M.Altenmann >t 15:05, 21 July 2015 (UTC)

Unexplained Reverts on Mat Article
Please explain your reverts of my edits on the Mat article. I was the translator of the original Russian verses. If you have a problem with the translation, please advise here or on my talk page. --Harald Forkbeard (talk) 23:13, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

You are confusing me with the references to 'original research'. I have duly reviewed the policy and see nothing wrong with my statement that I, and I alone, have translated the verse on this page, from the original Russian into English.

What else can be stated and what 'references' are you looking for? --Harald Forkbeard (talk) 02:58, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

Are you questioning the quality of my translation? If so, what are your qualifications in Russian / English translation?--Harald Forkbeard (talk) 03:00, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

Media mix
(moved to article talk page.) -M.Altenmann >t

Rzhev
Please reconsider your revert here. There was only one Germany in 1942-43 and absolutely everyone knows it was run by Hitler & the Nazis. But there was never a country officially styled "Nazi Germany," and that designation looks odd in the context of a purely military-history article.

The same could be said if the corresponding section heading were written as "Communist USSR," since everybody knows ... etc., etc. (Disclaimer: This user has no sympathy whatever for the Nazis, Nazism, etc.) Sca (talk) 15:13, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Nobody writes "Communist USSR" because it is redundant: USSR was always communist. Whereas Germany was "Nazi" for a short time, and one has to be clear which Germany was in the battle. "Nazi Germany" is a standard appellation, and wikipedia even has Category:Nazi Germany named so to properly pinpoint the time period. -M.Altenmann >t 15:28, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
 * As for "absolutely everyone", you will be sadly surprised if you go out in the U.S. streets and start asking such kind of quiz. in fact in one such quiz carried out in 1970s, 30% answered that USA fought against USSR in WWII. -M.Altenmann >t 15:31, 31 July 2015 (UTC)


 * , I understand your logic but you haven't convinced me.
 * I acknowledge widespread ignorance among certain strata about basic facts of modern history, but given the huge volume of popular-history coverage accorded the Third Reich, Holocaust, etc., I very much doubt that many even halfway literate English speakers don't know it was Nazi Germany that started WWII. (Certainly, very few readers of a relatively obscure article such as Battles of Rzhev would be unaware of it.)
 * Thus, in the context of WWII, Nazi Germany is just as redundant as Communist USSR would be. (And I wasn't suggesting use of that term – just drawing an analogy.)
 * Having said that, I appreciate your How Wikipedia Works graphic. Thank you for this helpful schematic. Sca (talk) 17:50, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

it was late night and i was not thinking clearly: the proper approach is to look how it is done in other similar wikipedia wwii articles and proceed from there. so i checked and saw that your approach is used. on the other hand i did find a page in which "German" forces were battling "Red" ones. :-) so your "communist ussr" is not so absurd (for some) as you thought :-) -M.Altenmann >t 02:21, 1 August 2015 (UTC)


 * , thanks – спасибо? – for making the change. Not very important in the grand scale, but it was good to have this exchange of ideas.
 * I happened to look up Rzhev because I was re-reading an old Paul Carrell book that describes it and was amazed at the casualty estimates he cites. I realize Carrell is not an unimpeachable source, so I wanted to check another one. Such a ferocious war! Sca (talk) 13:49, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

Mat (Russian profanity)
Sorry, you were wrong. I don't know how I missed that. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 03:31, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
 * I know I am sometimes wrong. But I have no idea what you have in mind. -M.Altenmann >t 14:14, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

Fly. listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Fly.. Since you had some involvement with the Fly. redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 20:15, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

Export (revolution) listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Export (revolution). Since you had some involvement with the Export (revolution) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Widefox ; talk 08:11, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

ROBERT CONQUEST
{moved into proper place: Talk:The Great Terror} - üser:Altenmann >t 14:13, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

Prodigy house
Thanks for this! But you need to add the tick symbol if you are happy, as you seem to be. Johnbod (talk) 11:31, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 7
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Album procedure, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Soviet republic. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:47, 7 August 2015 (UTC)

General secretary and similar topics, at wt:DPL
Hi, I hope you don't mind but I opened a discussion section at wt:DPL about General Secretary article that you modified recently, and I hope you would participate in discussion there. Could you please take a look at wp:DABCONCEPT and comment at the discussion? In my statement there I mentioned having had some disagreement with you recently but not being able to remember what that was. A section above reminds me that the issue was at Mat (Russian profanity) which I think is completely unrelated, do you agree? Especially if you think there is any problem between us, I will leave this new issue to others. But if you don't mind, I will participate. Please let me know; I will watch there and here. sincerely, -- do ncr  am  12:15, 8 August 2015 (UTC)

Stalin
hello. as i see you dont know Georgian. I have questen: if u dont know georgian, why u make correction of stalins surname? his surname was ჯუღაშვილი, please see romanization of georgian. dzh not ჯ, of course. please dont make more correction about this case. u dont know This issue.--Gaga.vaa (talk) 09:53, 9 August 2015 (UTC)

Therr Maitz
The name of band is created from russian word for "ant". It's an old funny story for the band name. Nothing too much special about it.

We acceptted your notice about relevant soureces. We are going to improve the article & we need your help to do that. Thank you Heldexa~enwiki (talk) 08:21, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

08:37:23, 13 August 2015 review of submission by Heldexa~enwiki
We acceptted your notice about relevant sources. We are going to improve the article & we need your help to do that. Thank you Heldexa~enwiki (talk) 08:37, 13 August 2015 (UTC) Heldexa~enwiki (talk) 08:37, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

Request on 12:02:44, 13 August 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Hariskhan12345
Hello, I would like to inform that I made several efforts to make sure to come up with something that actually makes with respect to Wikipedia's guidelines. However, I also understand there must be definitely something important that I am missing out, which results in article not being approved. I am effort to get my article approved on Wikipedia, I would like you to please help me with references. Hariskhan12345 (talk) 12:02, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I cannot help you with references. It is your job to find them. What exactly you don't understand in reviewers' comments? Did you read WP:NCORP? Also, if you are associated with the company, you are strongly doscouraged to write about it, per WP:COI. - üser:Altenmann >t 03:55, 14 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Thanks for your response, I would like to inform that I have made several changes to the article:
 * Removing products & services: I think its not encyclopedic content for readers
 * Removing unnecessary points
 * Removing weak references
 * Improve sentence structure for better understanding
 * Made sure to maintain only relevant and exact information with strong references.
 * I hope the article will now make sense to moderators and get approved as a source of information for Bangladeshi people. Hariskhan12345 (talk) 13:12, 19 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Just resubmitted article for Kaymu Bangladesh after fixing the tone and further removing references (although strong but not projecting Kaymu). I hope this will make sense, however, I would like to have your feedback if there are further updates required. Also, thanks for your contribution to the article.Hariskhan12345 (talk) 09:06, 20 August 2015 (UTC)


 * I would like to inform that I have further worked on article by removing unnecessary material and making sure to only provide strongest references. I hope this will now make complete sense with respect to Wikipedia guidelines. Hariskhan12345 (talk) 11:59, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 14
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kubyshka, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page East Slavic. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:37, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Cross of Sorrow
Hello! Your submission of Cross of Sorrow at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! ~ RobTalk 12:05, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Cross of Sorrow
Materialscientist (talk) 00:12, 15 August 2015 (UTC)

Please correctly add merge discussions
Don't add them back until you learn how. Thanks. Walter Görlitz (talk) 04:20, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
 * You will see that I . Wikipedia:Merging explains the process. Thanks. Walter Görlitz (talk) 04:23, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Sorry, you were acting as a police officer, not as a colleague wikipedian. Many find this trend greatly disturbing. - Nevertheless it becomes prevalent on wikipedia, if judging by edit count. In the future, if you revert something, please cite policy clearly in the edit summary. Otherwise your curt comment in edit summary looks quite frivolous. üser:Altenmann >t 15:01, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Sorry. I did explain why I reverted. Your sarcasm is violent commentary borders on ignorant. I elected to remove it from my talk page as a result. The fact that you show inexperience about Wikipedia is now evident to me.
 * You created an article over a redirect using copy-and-paste
 * You incorrectly created a moves request against guidelines (no talk created)
 * You tagged my talk page indicating that I need to cite policies or guidelines when reverting when all that is required is an edit summary because editors are supposed to WP:ASSUMECLUE
 * Not clearly differentiating between pillars, policies, guidelines and consensus.
 * There and a few other, minor points as well.
 * I have had my say at the merge discussion. I'm sorry your inexperience has caused this disagreement. I will try to keep communication with you both short and professional in the future. However, unless you are able to avoid vitriol in responding to me, don't do it on my talk page. See WP:OWNTALK. Thank you. Walter Görlitz (talk) 16:32, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

I apologized for my impulsive behavior in your talk page, which was responded with:
 * 10:02 (cur | prev) . . (-1,053)‎ . . Walter Görlitz (talk | contribs) (Reverted 4 edits by Altenmann (talk): Stay off my talk page. (TW))

IMO this greatly depreciates your post here. - üser:Altenmann >t 17:07, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
 * There's an edit notice on my talk page that clearly requests edits to be kept in one place. You don't seem to be reading that since you have tried to carry on a conversation in two places. On a separate note, there is a place that indicates if an editor asks you not to post to their talk page that you respect that. That's what I've done. You can leave comments here and either use talkback or ping. The former is left on my page requesting that I come talk to here here. I delete it and come talk here. The latter places a notice in my notifications area. I see it and come find who's talking about me and where. Walter Görlitz (talk) 02:49, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

Sorry for not making myself clear: You accused me of policy/guideline violation (you wrote ""You created an article over a redirect using copy-and-paste"). I don't understand what kind of violation it is. Please explain yourself. - üser:Altenmann >t 23:41, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Generally, there's a reason why a redirect is made. It should be addressed before turning it into an article. The talk page definitely needs to be fixed. The bigger issue is explained at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Sorry. Should have pointed you to it. Again, I'm assuming you have an understanding of how Wikipedia works or at least can search to find content. Walter Görlitz (talk) 02:49, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

Trump
LOL.. I cite myself for that one!--Milowent • hasspoken 03:28, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

convex hull algorithms
Dear Altenmann,

I would appreciate your input at Talk:Convex hull algorithms.

Thank you. --DavidCary (talk) 17:51, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

Tree traversal
Dear Altenmann, you reverted my new section in "Tree traversal" because "primary source nonnotable. (TW)". What do you mean by that: Is the reference to Ben Pfaff defective? What about the other pseudocode examples which do not carry any reference at all? And have a since June 2013 and are still in the article? Pls answer in your user talk page. Best regards, --Nomen4Omen (talk) 08:07, 27 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Dear Altenmann, you reverted several edits and again the section "Nonrecursive tree traversal by iteration" in Tree traversal because "Rv unreferened original research". You certainly know that it is NOT original research − see the mentioned sources Pfaff and Sedgewick, although Sedgewick is not completely explicit. But there is also http://code.google.com/p/badvpn/source/browse/trunk/structure/BAVL.h#685. Would it help you adding this one? Best regards, --Nomen4Omen (talk) 08:01, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 30
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Aplomb
 * added a link pointing to Plummet


 * Bureau of the Central Committee of the Russian Communist Party (bolsheviks)
 * added a link pointing to Don River


 * Left-Right bloc
 * added a link pointing to Robert Davies

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Names of Soviet origin
Hello! Your submission of Names of Soviet origin at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! — howcheng  {chat} 20:47, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

Lifted content from anti-gravity
I agree with the removal of the London moment entry, the one I had tagged for relevance. The other entries at least make a plausible claim of relevance (and "sound like anti-gravity" as described). I don't strongly object to removing the whole lot of them, just wanted to confirm that was your intent rather than the just the late and dubious addition. DMacks (talk) 16:16, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 10
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Palakion
 * added a link pointing to Chersonesos


 * The Will of Peter the Great
 * added a link pointing to John Barrow

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:28, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Names of Soviet origin
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

Russian Sailor's Dance
I reverted the seven links you added on drum & bugle corps articles for Glière's "Russian Sailor's Dance." In case you failed to notice, NO TUNES ARE LINKED on those pages... GWFrog (talk) 22:07, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
 * From the Manual of Style/Linking : "An overlinked article contains an excessive number of links, making it difficult to identify links likely to aid the reader's understanding significantly." Linking every tune as well as the composers is exceedingly excessive, thus was the decision made some years ago to limit the links to just the composers... GWFrog (talk)
 * There is nothing excessive when linking in lists. Overlinking is relevant to plain text, which indeed becomes unreadable. As an extreme example, there is no overlinking in e.g., List of theoretical physicists, or in >t 17:53, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 21
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Polish landed gentry, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Burgess. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:05, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

Dua's layer
Thank you for your comments. The changes I made are all scientific and authentic. I did not violate Wikipedia rules as references removed where either media references (non scientific) or relation to abstracts for letters while they do not contain abstracts. The page originally asked for adding scientific contents and references. I provided a balanced view of the article and included every single scientific publications on the matter, either with or against. Do you have some advice on including my contribution to the current page and removing the inaccurate and misleading references? --Hamezza (talk) 19:15, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

Julier Valley listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Julier Valley. Since you had some involvement with the Julier Valley redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. ZH8000 (talk) 00:22, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

Julier river listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Julier river. Since you had some involvement with the Julier river redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. ZH8000 (talk) 01:28, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Călușari (disambiguation)


A tag has been placed on Călușari (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G6 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either
 * disambiguates two or fewer extant Wikipedia pages and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic); or
 * disambiguates no (zero) extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. George Ho (talk) 04:53, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 12
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Disuse supersensitivity
 * added a link pointing to Withdrawal syndrome


 * Gopnik
 * added a link pointing to Mugging


 * Harold Felton
 * added a link pointing to Neola

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:37, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

Invitation to discussion
Hi, Whataboutism article was nominated for deletion, on the grounds of being non-notable neologism that is being promoted through wikipedia, especially after neologism template was repeatedly removed without consensus. Since you are a contributor to said article, I invite you to present your opinion on it's AfD page. Thanks! Niyaro (talk) 07:02, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

Schwartz (surname)
Hello, I think that a 67-item list is impossible to read, much less search. --NaBUru38 (talk) 23:50, 17 October 2015 (UTC) Nobody reads such liats. And 'Schwartz' is not the only one that large (not even the largest). Good or not, alphabetic sorting is accepted for such pages. If you have a better idea, you have to apply it to all surname pages; we prefer to handle things uniformly in wikipedia. But to apply a different format everywhere, you have to discuss it with community first. I suggest you start discussion in WikiProject Antroponymy, with a notification at WikiProject Disambiguation. - üser:Altenmann >t 15:38, 20 October 2015 (UTC)

Deletion
Your article you started Third Rome is up for deletion at AFD. So if you want to save it go there. TypingInTheSky (talk) 02:43, 28 October 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 29
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited On the Rehabilitation of Repressed Peoples, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Annexation of Crimea by Russia. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:50, 29 October 2015 (UTC)

Stub worth rescuing?
I have found a number of interesting user drafts in inactive user's sandbox. This one made me think that you could be a judge of whether to stub it in mainspace or leave and forget: User:CaliforniaAliBaba/Sandbox. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 13:12, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

Big pharma conspiracy theory
Thanks for your edits. What would you recommend I do in the future? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aherrera8827 (talk • contribs) 07:16, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 5
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Vladimir Ivanovich Yerofeyev, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Trud. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:33, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

Mittal additions
Thank you user:Altenmann for your concern. The mass of additions, it seemed to me, amounted to a publicity move, which is not the right thing to do on Wikipedia. Iss246 (talk) 01:32, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

OpenOffice
I have read MOS:DAB. I have also read WP:CONSENSUS. Please take a few minutes to read the dab's talk page. Walter Görlitz (talk) 08:00, 11 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 12
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Accidental travel, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Space travel and Alternative universe. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:42, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

Swill milk scandal
I just wanted to drop by and thank you for creating this article. Viriditas (talk) 20:28, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

Facts
What right do you have to hide the facts? My statements are non biased, unlike the majority of this article on President Putin. This is your warning. Do not hide facts which are unbiased. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thedawgbelongmem (talk • contribs) 07:26, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
 * This has nothing to do with "hiding facts". In wikipedia you must prove facts. In your case, your footnotes do not support the statement about putin;s rating " both inside and outside Russia's hemisphere of influence" . - üser:Altenmann >t 07:30, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Evidnece
What back up do I have for my statement? I live there. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thedawgbelongmem (talk • contribs) 07:29, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Thank you for clarifying the regulations of Wikipedia. I apologise if I wasn't aware of the full conditions, which obviously are dictated by those who would rather support the "correct" and "educated" beliefs. It would appear that my statements, supported by reputable references, are counterproductive in some way to the purpose of Wikipedia. What is it's purpose? Is it not to share facts supported by evidence? Have you no common sense? You claim the statements I make could cause drama by being biased. Define "biased". Because what is biased? An article stating a truthful comment from world class journalists, or a page full of facts that fail to show the other side? The scales only lean toward mainstream media propaganda. Who is the aggressive one hear? The one sharing a fact, or the one demanding that the other side of an argument cannot be even whispered? Again, do you have no common sense? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thedawgbelongmem (talk • contribs) 08:03, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

It is a very responsible thing to share any information, particularly on Wikipedia. With all sources, I verify every detail in a source before it is shared. If you cannot accept any facts outside the dogmatic views of western media and their puppets, you have the problem, not I. I have said it before. Do you have no common sense? You remove written statements, not based on false information, but based on your ideology of an American exceptionlist world. I present all facts, but you cannot remove nor hide evidence. As a great man once said, a bad marriage will fail, no matter how good the first night of marriage is. I urge you, as a colleague and fellow writer, to consider all facts and stop presenting everything under the light of commercial and imperialist "facts", who only go to war where their business interests run. All our lives, the only truth we've ever known is this: ceaseless war. Do you think, for the love of humanity and its rights, it is too much to ask that you take a stand for sharing truth, and just maybe, we can end this nightmare which should never be called reality? Your conscience and morals will decide. I pray I'm not the only one who respects humanity over American business interests. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thedawgbelongmem (talk • contribs) 06:55, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
 * this is not about "dogmatic views of western media" This is about you distorting information coming even from Russian sources. - üser:Altenmann >t 02:38, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 22
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Petrodvorets Watch Factory, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Petrodvorets. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Obama chmo!
AfD: Nominated for deletion; see Articles for deletion/Obama chmo! — chelo Vechek /  talk  02:46, 26 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 29
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Greek Autonomous District, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Soviet republic. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:43, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of CATS (software)


The article CATS (software) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing General notability guideline and the more detailed Notability (software) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back. Thank you,

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 06:46, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

You note what I already knew, in wikipedia we have a policy of WP:COI: let others write about you.

In response to you I just want to say two things. First, in a WP article entitled Critical approaches to Hamlet, at the very bottom of the page, you find a paragraph inserted by the author of the book being talked about in the paragraph. The book is "Hamlet Made Simple and Other Essays." The book is published, in fact, and has an actual ISBN number and so forth. But it is the author himself who is writing in that entry about his own book-- and writing about himself, the author. Does he comply with WP:COI?

Second, this is kind of futile, but you had said that the Theories of Humor article sucks. I know there's not much we can do about this, but it's not the article that sucks, it's the theories IN it because they're all either false or trivial. The article itself and its form and presentation is not very bad.Cdg1072 (talk) 00:04, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

Roll call and rare fruit
Rare fruit is different from a superfruit. The latter is a marketing term (of dubious validity). A rare fruit, by contrast, is a fruit that isn't yet under widespread cultivation but has some properties that may make it commercially valuable some day or are sought after by collectors, horticulturists, farmers, etc.. Adam Gollner wrote a book about it: The Fruit Hunters: A Story of Nature, Adventure, Commerce, and Obsession (which later became adapted as a documentary: The Fruit Hunters) - it's all about how different fruit varieties/cultivars are discovered. Modern Farmer has a review: see here.

As for roll call, thanks for drawing my attention to ad hoc and the "blown-up disambig" type of page. I may try tomorrow or later this week to remodel the roll call page along those lines (the ad hoc page is decent because it has clear delineations in meanings/section headers and does not duplicate content already on other pages; the roll call article will benefit from more clarity and a significant pruning).

Best regards --Neutralitytalk 06:13, 15 December 2015 (UTC)

- I was rather thinking about 'killing' ad hoc just as roll call. Otherwise an "improvement" magnet will remain and tumor will regrow. - üser:Altenmann >t 06:27, 15 December 2015 (UTC)

As dor superfruit, all of them in a way are 'rare fruits' outside its native area, eg gojiberry, which exotics serves well for marketing hype. exotic fruit -:-) ? - üser:Altenmann >t 06:31, 15 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Killing in the sense of redirecting both? That would be fine with me; ad hoc could go to List of Latin phrases (A) and roll call could go to roll-call vote (with hat-note on top for secondary/alt meanings). Neutralitytalk 06:35, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Actually ad hoc (disambiguation), and "List of..." as a merge target. As for latin phrases, this is a golden mine; you can comb Category:Latin words and phrases for kill target ad infinitum and ad nauseam. :-) But probably for massive changes one better start a discussion somewhere. Do you have any idea of an appropriate forum? - üser:Altenmann >t
 * There's WikiProject Latin, although it is only semi-active. Neutralitytalk 07:02, 15 December 2015 (UTC)


 * P.S.: I just saw California Rare Fruit Growers Association and pomology, which are somewhat interesting. Rare fruit could conceivably be a subset of pomology. Neutralitytalk 06:35, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
 * And again, "Exotic fruits are that which are not native and that are cultivated outside, available at their place of origin" ; also [here. I say, has a wikipotential of bluelink, if you interested. - üser:Altenmann [[user talk:Altenmann|>t]] 06:48, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
 * A good link, and definitely has article potential. I will put this on my to-do list (probably for 2016). Neutralitytalk 07:02, 15 December 2015 (UTC)

Perhaps, you are a real person?
it has already come the time to ask - with what exactly was poison Mr. President Putin, poisoned in 2012.? Not just pure curiosity. Thousands and helping millions of TV, Internet viewers geseehn this poisoning -Simptome on Mr. Putin's face, immediately after exchange line entry. Now, start the Moskva River - Wikipedia User's Agency us with, possibly, edit same remedies. These give the same effect werend few hours. Why do they do that? For an intimidation? Punishment ? No matter. It is interesting what kind of a poison? Exestieren an antidote, an antidote, a treatment?NATO Europarl circle (talk) 14:53, 15 December 2015 (UTC)

Attractive fixed set
Hi, you created redirect Attractive fixed set, but the target article does not describe the term. Can you fix this? - üser:Altenmann >t 16:09, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Done. -- Beland (talk) 21:04, 16 December 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 20
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Russia–Ukraine relations
 * added links pointing to Soviet republic and Annexation of Crimea by Russia


 * Guliyev
 * added a link pointing to Emin Guliyev

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

Your unexplained revert
My full reasoning is provided in the edit summaries. Your edit summary was blank. By the way, the article was WP:OR and should have been deleted. --Moscow Connection (talk) 22:53, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
 * See article talk page. - üser:Altenmann >t 02:48, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 27
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Chizhevsky
 * added a link pointing to Chizhov


 * Word usage
 * added a link pointing to Hacker

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

Edits on Ravi Gomatam page
Thank you or your edits. I have emailed you some of my thoughts. Rahularch (talk) 22:37, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

RfC announce: Religion in infoboxes
There is an RfC at Template talk:Infobox concerning what should be allowed in the religion entry in infoboxes. Please join the discussion and help us to arrive at a consensus on this issue. --Guy Macon (talk) 22:08, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

Hi, friend
I've seen your name in the edit history of a couple pieces on the economic history of early Soviet Russia and thought I would say hello. I spotted in particular your Monetary reform in the Soviet Union, 1922–24, which seems like it could be expanded as a sequel to my Hyperinflation in early Soviet Russia. I sort of ran out of gas on that one but will return to it one of these days. I'm currently working on the Grain Crisis of 1928. Best regards, —Tim Davenport, Corvallis, OR (USA) /// ShoeHutch@gmail.com /// Carrite (talk) 19:00, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I can be of no help. Recently I simply cannot force my brain to write longer articles. BTW, I noticed Nikolai Mezhlauk in your plans. I never heard of. There are two more brothers Mezhlauks, but they don't seem notable per wikipedia standards. - üser:Altenmann >t 16:43, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
 * I know what you mean about needing to force one's brain, I'm going very slowly on my current one, although big topics are harder to write about than are biographies. As for Mezhlauk, I started the page on Valery Mezhlauk but somehow turned him into Nikolay Mezhlauk on my user page. Thanks for pointing that out, I missed it. Best regards, —Tim /// Carrite (talk) 19:06, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

"Wonder" tales in Propp's book title
Hi there. I was just wondering if there's any justification for using the rather marginal term "wonder tale" instead of "fairy tale", given the book hasn't even been translated into English afaik. Uanfala (talk) 21:33, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Because that's how the "волшебной сказки" was translated. And there is nothing marginal. The book was not translated, but the title was. - üser:Altenmann >t 03:40, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Now I see. Thanks! Uanfala (talk) 09:31, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

Litvinenko Inquiry revert
Your wholesale deletion has already been reverted by someone else, and re-edited by another. I've added an Rfc to the Talk page, so if you wish to comment you can do so there. Engleham (talk) 05:43, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

The First Tractor
Hi!

On dewiki, the (translation of) your very old article The First Tractor showed up on the deletion discussion because it lacks sources. You do not, by chance, remember the sources you used for that article or at least where to find them or where the image was taken from? --PaterMcFly talk contribs 07:31, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
 * It was written 12 years ago when the idea of sources and references was vague, so it was completely out of my head. I don't know about dewiki, but here in enwiki it may survive as a disambiguation page (done). Meanwhile I will keep looking; may be someone got inspired by a wikipedia article. :-) Первый трактор тунам урем дене эрталын! :-) - üser:Altenmann >t 08:03, 22 January 2016 (UTC)


 * I know sourcing wasn't a big deal back then, and so this isn't exactly the answer I hoped for :-( Also, I don't speak russian, so searching could be difficult. Thanks anyway. --PaterMcFly talk contribs 08:37, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

Ambiguous link
Honestly I'm not sure what you expect me to do. The reference says "a granddaughter of James Simon, with whom she was particularly close". And that's it. There is zero information on who that person was. No indication if he was notable and if so for what. Tassedethe (talk) 23:29, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
 * do research. or do nothing. or do something where you know what to do. - i could have given you a better advice, but i am afraid you will take it for insult.  üser:Altenmann >t 20:20, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

Category:Soviet establishments has been nominated for discussion
Category:Soviet establishments, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 20:41, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 2
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nadiya Savchenko, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page In absentia. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:23, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

Image removal
You recently removed my images from Samba (Brazilian dance) with a comment "Samba is not a Finnish dance". I agree it's not, but whoever said Brazilian dances may only be danced in Brazil, and one may only dance Finnish dances in Finland? Would you have been happy if I had, for example, gone to the samba festival in Coburg and uploaded a picture, or would you have removed it too with a comment "Samba is not a German dance"? J I P &#124; Talk 20:11, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Please notice that this article has a Finnish samba picture. And it is quite spectacular, too: samba in the rain; it is something juicy, diversity. The other two are quite mundane. No, I would not have removed samba festival even in Gvarv, if it were something special. You can have the whole gallery downtext, titled "Brazilian Samba around the world". That would be encyclopedic. But having over half pictures from Finland about Brazilian dance without particular reason is WP:UNDUE. - üser:Altenmann >t 05:26, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 9
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jankūnas, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lt. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:48, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

Sterling Stuckey
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Sterling Stuckey, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://history.ucr.edu/People/Faculty/Stuckey/index.html.

It is possible that the bot was mistaken and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 04:50, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

Category:Soviet state establishments has been nominated for discussion
Category:Soviet state establishments, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 21:04, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Cyborg the Wikipedian
What do you mean "Not done so"? (Think back to when you undid my Roland Bautista edit) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cyborg the Wikipedian (talk • contribs) 22:24, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Sorry for my English. It meand We don't do this, according to wikipedia's style of bio articles. - üser:Altenmann >t 00:11, 15 February 2016 (UTC)


 * Well, certain month articles (August, April and February) have a section talking about how their start days and end days match other months. Why can't the December article (or the remaining month articles) have a section explain their start days and end days corresponding with other months?
 * Because the text was without references. - üser:Altenmann >t 03:18, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

You are not newcomer, knowledge please
The article is biased and you defend the bias, it's not exactly Wikipedia is about.Xx236 (talk) 06:42, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Many Poles run away or were expelled to Poland, some killed by the NKVD or deported to Siberia. - there are thousands books on the subject. Xx236 (talk) 06:46, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
 * I have no idea what you are talking abut. - üser:Altenmann >t 06:56, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

Warning
(moved to article talk page) - üser:Altenmann >t 04:20, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

K-Spanner and Graph spanner
On 19 June 2007‎, you edited K-spanner three times, changing it from "#REDIRECT Tree spanner" to a disambiguation with the choices of Graph spanner, Tree spanner, and Geometric spanner. At the same time, you created Graph spanner as #redirect Glossary of graph theory. Unfortunately, "Distance" is not a proper anchor in Glossary of graph theory, so it goes to the top, and the user who clicked on "Graph spanner" has no idea where to look in this page. However, the "distance" entry on this page includes the link Distance (graph theory). Is that topic a valid disambiguation for K-spanner? If so, let's change the Graph spanner entry to Distance (graph theory). If not, what should we do with the current Graph spanner entry? Then, a second project is to improve the articles that link to Graph spanner. I fixed Social network, and that leaves three articles linking to Graph spanner, and I lack the expertise to determine if these links can be replaced with Distance (graph theory). —Anomalocaris (talk) 17:15, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
 * It was a valid redirect back then in 2007. I am pinging who is qualified to make sense of this. BTW, don't forget about t-spanner. - üser:Altenmann >t 05:45, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Stretch factor is also related. I recently began a major rewrite of glossary of graph theory to make it look more like a glossary (compare e.g. glossary of set theory) and less like a rambling rewrite of the main graph theory article. Unfortunately, some topics that were covered in the old version of the glossary got lost by the wayside, and graph spanners are one of them. They deserve a proper article but since I think the main survey in this area is still my paper "Spanning trees and spanners" I may have too much of a conflict-of-interest to write it myself. In the meantime, the distance article is not a good choice for the redirect because it doesn't mention spanners. —David Eppstein (talk) 06:07, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
 * I don't think there will be any COI threats over a mathematical subject. If we run into an idiot, the problem is easily avoidable via a "draft"-"review"-"copy into mainspace" trick happily employed by various paid editors. - üser:Altenmann >t 06:14, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
 * The quicker temporary solution would be to add an entry on spanners to the glossary and change the redirect to Glossary of graph theory (or maybe even a more closely targeted redirect handle if someone knows how to do those). —David Eppstein (talk) 06:17, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
 * There is a device called "anchor" for redirects, but I run into some wikipedians who claim it does not work well for all browsers, so they replace it whenever see it. - üser:Altenmann >t 06:21, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Turns out that for the format I'm using, anchor is redundant: you can already link to any individual term. Anyway, I added "spanner" and changed the redirect to match. —David Eppstein (talk) 08:11, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
 * I don't have expertise here, but it looks good, thanks! —Anomalocaris (talk) 19:45, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 4
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Northland State, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sool. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:28, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

War edit
Do you think I am so stupid that not even notice how your back with phrases from section disappears and the global template " neutrality " of the preamble ? Bad idea. Solaire the knight (talk) 15:43, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 16
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lila Tretikov, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Olga. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:23, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

Thanks
User:BD2412 explained to me about the complex Sabbatarians issue. Thank you for cleaning that up after me. Best regards. YuHuw (talk) 17:27, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

Category:Optical devices has been nominated for discussion
Category:Optical devices, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. fgnievinski (talk) 03:07, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 23
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Shulba Sutras, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Incommensurability. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:51, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

--Arun Sunil Kollam (talk) 02:16, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

Category:Comedy and humor by nationality has been nominated for discussion
Category:Comedy and humor by nationality, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. PanchoS (talk) 16:06, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

Panamagate listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Panamagate. Since you had some involvement with the Panamagate redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Mz7 (talk) 23:53, 5 April 2016 (UTC)

Panamagate
Hi Altemann. So where is the content that was at Panamagate before you redirected it to Panama Papers? Rui &#39;&#39;Gabriel&#39;&#39; Correia (talk) 11:55, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Hi again. Perhaps I am confused. For clarity, see my reply to another editor on my talk page. Rui &#39;&#39;Gabriel&#39;&#39; Correia (talk) 14:57, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

Repression in the Soviet Union
Check the talk page on Template:Repression in the Soviet Union, lets talk about the content of the sidebar. Mangokeylime (talk) 16:08, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

Cutting stock problem
Please do not keep removing the example from this page. The reason you have given for its removal "This is not "small example" an has no explanatory value" is subjective and, in my opinion, not accurate. The example is big enough to illustrate the complexity of the problem, but it is on the small end of the scale for such problems.Cngoulimis (talk) 11:05, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

Third opinion decline
I have removed your submission at WP:3O. After reviewing the linked Talk page, I note that there has not been a thorough discussion there. Please be aware that there must be significant discussion at the Talk page as a prerequisite for requesting a third opinion. If you feel that further discussion at the Talk page currently will not be productive, I would invite you to consider other forms of dispute resolution. Thank you for your understanding. DonIago (talk) 14:26, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in.
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!  Sekyaw  (talk)  16:28, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 8
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Regina Tyshkevich, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Graph (mathematics). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:20, 8 May 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 15
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Kovalik
 * added a link pointing to Smith


 * Schmieden
 * added a link pointing to Smiths

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:44, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of World Swing Dance Council for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article World Swing Dance Council is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/World Swing Dance Council until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Theroadislong (talk) 20:08, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Swing Dance Hall of Fame for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Swing Dance Hall of Fame is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Swing Dance Hall of Fame until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. J bh Talk  13:34, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 22
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rolando Díaz, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Es. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:10, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

Talkback
— Godsy (TALK CONT ) 08:43, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 31
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Kazakh famine of 1919–1922
 * added a link pointing to Kirghiz Autonomous Socialist Soviet Republic


 * Kuban bridgehead
 * added a link pointing to Slavyanskaya

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:51, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

2016 Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Community Survey
The Board of Trustees of the Wikimedia Foundation has appointed a committee to lead the search for the foundation’s next Executive Director. One of our first tasks is to write the job description of the executive director position, and we are asking for input from the Wikimedia community. Please take a few minutes and complete this survey to help us better understand community and staff expectations for the Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director.
 * Survey, (hosted by Qualtrics)

Thank you, The Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Steering Committee via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:48, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 12
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bans on Communist symbols, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Red flag. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:44, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

(Reverted to revision 719075584 by 139.19.106.129 (talk): Rv promo of nonnotable software. (TW))
Hi. You have undone my edit, and left me a message saying "Please do not add lists of software of unknown quality without 3rd party review, per WP:UNDUE". I am not an expert user of Wikipedia, so apologies if I did something wrong. However, I am an academic publishing about facility location problems, and I have a good grasp of what is the relevant software. Pages on other Operations Research related pages (e.g. Knapsack problem and Logistic regression) have software sections. How can I go about certifying which software is notable / nonnotable? Thanks in advance.

Disambiguation link notification for June 20
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited White Russia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page White Russians. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

dissident
Hello. I hope we can come to an agreement on this article. Theodor Billroth described the Faculty opposed to Semmelweis as "A generation that had been reared in an intellectual straight-jacket with dark spectacles before their eyes and cotton wool in their ears." I think the words dogma or the term tacit assumption is an appropriate description.

Also, I think that Jean de Climont is an authority on scientific dissidents, having published a few editions of his book. Thanks BinaryPhoton — Preceding unsigned comment added by BinaryPhoton (talk • contribs) 14:53, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

dissident
Hello. I hope we can come to an agreement on this article. Theodor Billroth described the Faculty opposed to Semmelweis as "A generation that had been reared in an intellectual straight-jacket with dark spectacles before their eyes and cotton wool in their ears." I think the words dogma or the term tacit assumption is an appropriate description.

Also, I think that Jean de Climont is an authority on scientific dissidents, having published a few editions of his book. Thanks BinaryPhoton (talk) 14:54, 6 July 2016 (UTC) BinaryPhoton

Regarding Randy Wayne (biologist)
Yes in the past (years back) there were WP:COI contributions, and in the not-so-distant past, a few trivial additions, but I watch the article and think it is fine. All of the current text was basically written by me -- and I have no connection with the subject. So the WP:COI tag doesn't really belong, nor does the notability tag -- there are plenty of references.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 15:22, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

Template: Ruheroes - removal of medal image?
Please see Template_talk:Ruheroes. Pam D  09:06, 8 July 2016 (UTC)

Byelorussia (White Russia)
Белоруссия значит белую Россию в английском почему обратнй редактированйе ? 5.56.31.175 (talk) 08:27, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
 * this is not exactly so. It is discussed in detail in section Belarus. - üser:Altenmann >t 15:17, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
 * yes, sorry about that, I missed the entire Etymology section as I had the contents list dropped down and it is very long 5.56.31.175 (talk) 09:18, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

Talk:Tsarist_autocracy
The creator of this article asked me to message you about deleting the article. 2001:1C02:1907:9500:6DC8:DB74:E72E:310D (talk) 09:48, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of InformIT (publisher) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article InformIT (publisher) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/InformIT (publisher) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 14:29, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

"Heraldic family" nominated for deletion

 * Your article "Heraldic family" was nominated on 9 August 2016 by camdan for deletion.
 * Regards, Nihil novi (talk) 06:59, 9 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Greetings. I nominated article "Heraldic" family for delation and suggested renaming to "Heraldic Clan" adding reliable sources to that. I see that You removed the tag that supported further discussion. There is no term "Heraldic family", never heared of that, it have never been used in any publicaiton and its not correct. Regards, camdan (talk) 09:47, 9 August 2016 (UTC)


 * I invite You to discussion about question raised on WikiProject Heraldry camdan (talk) 14:40, 10 August 2016 (CEST)

Soviet national anthem and decommunisation laws in Baltic States
I'm not familiar with Wikipedia editing, perhaps I did something wrong, but I did not quite understand the undo of the edit (as far as I can tell the edit improved the accuracy of the article - the laws of at least some of the Baltic States are verifiable from source). Can you elaborate what was wrong with the edit so I can do better in the future? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hundisilm (talk • contribs) 20:12, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Just don't edit things you don't know for sure. - üser:Altenmann >t 15:25, 11 August 2016 (UTC)

Polish heraldry and Heraldic clan

 * Hello. Im working on art "Polish heraldry baecause it had no sources or citations, goal is to reach GA quality art. Its in many cases linked to the art. "Heraldic clan" and it would be good to improve both. I would appreciate Your input on further improvement and also discuss matter when to use "Heraldic family", as I refered to that expression in the art. "Polish heraldry" so its same in both art. Best regards, camdan (talk) 04:32, 28 August 2016 (CEST)

Please see Talk:Dmitry Gudkov
Request for clarification. Please help me understand, and see Talk:Dmitry Gudkov (regards non-system opposition too). 69.58.42.90 (talk) 20:18, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for the pointer. How about this at Talk:Dmitry Gudkov ? 69.58.42.90 (talk) 19:09, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 28
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited VC Uralochka-NTMK, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ural. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:52, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of BESM (disambiguation) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article BESM (disambiguation) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/BESM (disambiguation) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

See Miscellany for deletion/BESM (disambiguation) for further information regarding this nomination. Thanks, — Godsy (TALK CONT ) 03:49, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

Dab vs. patronyms
Hello.

Please don't move Russian people articles to patronymic versions. The patronym should generally not be used as an disambiguator, because it's almost never part of the WP:COMMONNAME. Additionally, with the patronym in the article name, readers who search for a person will be required to know the person's patronym, something that is rarely the case. (Indeed, they might even want to know the person's patronym, which causes a catch 22 situation: you must know the patronym in order to find out the patronym.)

For instance, readers are more likely to know that Nikolay Korolyov is a boxer, than they are to know that his patronym is Fyodorovich.

Thanks.

HandsomeFella (talk) 11:00, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
 * well, a yet another demonstration of anglo-saxon disregard and disrespect of other cultures. whatever. this is english wikipedia, i will not contest. - üser:Altenmann >t 15:26, 4 October 2016 (UTC)


 * I assure you, no disrespect is intended, it's only that in the English-speaking world, people are usually known by their firstname and lastname, and only rarely firstname, father's name and lastname. It's just being realistic.
 * Thanks for your understanding.
 * HandsomeFella (talk) 16:09, 4 October 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 5
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of conspiracy theories, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jewish Communism. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:08, 5 October 2016 (UTC)