User talk:Altivia

August 2010
You have been mentioned in a post on the Administrator's Noticeboard. See the relevant discussion here. Stonemason89 (talk) 14:32, 25 August 2010 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Pamela Geller. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Note: This also applies to the edits you have evidently made as 72.89.241.5 (talk). -- Gyrofrog (talk) 16:42, 25 August 2010 (UTC)

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. The next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did to Pamela Geller, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. You have persistently edit warred to maintain your own point of view in the article, both from your registered account and anonymously, and have shown no sign at all of willingness to discuss with other editors. JamesBWatson (talk) 20:03, 26 August 2010 (UTC)