User talk:Altman

Welcome
Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   and your question on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! --Geniac 02:04, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Manual of Style

User:AItman
Hi, Altman! I hope you're having a good evening (or day, depending on where you're located - lol). I noticed in the user creation log that the account with username "AItman" was created, and that you used this account to sign its user page signifying that it's your account. If this is a doppelgänger account, you should instead add " #REDIRECT User:Altman " to User:AItman, and add " #REDIRECT User talk:Altman " User talk:AItman. This way, if people misspell it, it'll just redirect them to the correct page and they won't have to click or do anything. Just figured I'd let you know :-). Cheers --  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   05:43, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Ah, it looks like you inserted the doppelgänger template on both pages. That works, too :-). Cheers :-)  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   05:46, 12 December 2017 (UTC)


 * – Aloha Oshwah — I've done both now; mahalo for the tip! – Altman (talk) 06:30, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
 * You bet! Glad I could be of help :-)  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   07:00, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

 * Hi Altman! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission.  I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
 * The Teahouse new editor help space
 * Wikipedia Help pages

-- 16:20, Wednesday, December 13, 2017 (UTC)

OpenEdition Request
Altman, I'm curious why you are requesting account access to OpenEdition. It's a social sciences database, whereas the other accounts you've requested and your focus area on Wiki seem to be in the realm of STEM. I've put your application under review and will wait to hear back from you. Cheers, Finktron (talk) 10:45, 18 December 2017 (UTC)


 * – Hi Finktron, Certainly: understood, and thanks for reaching out to me. I've been on international travels as of late, and I seem to have gotten the name confused with (what I thought was) another STEM source—my intended action. Please disregard the OpenEdition component of my request for access and resubmit. Let me know if there's anything else I can do to help. Carpe futurum, – Altman (talk) 13:59, 18 December 2017 (UTC)


 * No worries! I only handle OpenEdition for the time being but other coordinators should be at work reviewing user access for the other services you've requested. Thanks and Best Regards, Finktron (talk) 15:13, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

QUIST or QuIST?
Just out of curiousity, when you created QuEST the U was not capitalized but at QUIST it was. Was there any particular reason for that? It seems like the official DARPA sources format it with the lower-case U. RA 0808  talkcontribs 17:36, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
 * — Thanks for the catch. I was just coming back to update that myself when I saw that you'd already gone ahead and done so. I started out writing the QUIST article, then moving on to QuEST, Quiness, QuBo and QuASAR.


 * In both government and academic circles, it was common to see both variants in use, with QUIST (all caps) being slightly more prevalent from 2001 – 2005. By the time QuEST came around (2008 – 2012), the lowercase got to see more common use.


 * When written as a standalone term, QuIST was more common, but when written as a full program, e.g. DARPA QUIST, the all-caps variant saw more use.


 * But taking a glance at the official DARPA website for the QUBE (Quantum Effects in Biological Environments) program, both the page url and paragraph heading use all capitals (QUBE). Yet towards the bottom of the abstract, it's abruptly switched over to QuBE.


 * Or take a look at QUASAR (Quantum Assisted Sensing and Readout). In this instance, the page url uses the lowercase variant, the paragraph heading is all caps (QUASAR), and towards the bottom then switches again to lowercase (QuASAR).


 * Quiness dispells with convention altogether, with no way to merge Macroscopic Quantum Communications into an acronym.


 * Perhaps it's Title or heading = ALL CAPS ; in-sentence usage = Mixed Lowercase? Then I'd have to change QuEST, QuaSAR and QuBo ...


 * If the agency can't decide on a fixed format for its own website, and everyday government and academic use (scientific papers, reports, presentations) demonstrates roughly an even-handed distribution of the alternatives, it's hard to say one or the other is solely correct.


 * But Wikipedia is case-sensitive, so the distinction matters. I was planning to go by the strictest possible interpretation, using the formal moniker as defined in the white paper (Broad Agency Announcement). It's more likely to use the lowercase mixed example. On the other hand, most people conducting a search or stumbling across the terms won't have the level of familiarity to know which specific letters to capitalize, so redirects are in order are set . – 20:46, 12 January 2018 (UTC)


 * One more option: the distinction between QUIST as a standalone entry, listing it under DARPA_QUIST or as DARPA QUIST Program. Again, I've seen links from the DARPA #Active_projects section that use all three variants.


 * I'm entirely open to any suggestions. – a l t m a n📞– 19:20, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

Quiness
I've restored the page. I appeared to have deleted the page in error, as I did not intend to remove that page. My apologies for that! RickinBaltimore (talk) 15:57, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Yup, I see what I did. Criminy. Again, my deepest apologies. RickinBaltimore (talk) 16:00, 25 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Thank you. Given the national security context of the program and the impact of its predecessor, the ARPANET (which is why we're here today), I was at a loss as to how it could possibly be seen as nonviable. Much appreciated! –  Alt man 📞– 16:09, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
 * That will teach me to go back a screen at the wrong time. RickinBaltimore (talk) 16:37, 25 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Totally understandable. Thanks for your assessment and tag removal—see you on the quantum internet. :) –   Alt man 📞– 17:10, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

Your signature
Please be aware that your signature uses deprecated  tags, which are causing Obsolete HTML tags lint errors. There is also a misnested tag from  closed outside rather than inside the wikilink.

You are encouraged to change
 * : –  Àłẗ ṁåɳ 📞–

to
 * : – Àłẗ ṁåɳ 📞–

—Anomalocaris (talk) 21:12, 25 January 2018 (UTC)


 * — Thank you! – Alt man 📞– 01:51, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Thank you for updating your signature! —Anomalocaris (talk) 06:36, 26 January 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Quiness


The article Quiness has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "I'm unable to find sources which indicate that this is any different from any of the other thousands of research programs conducted. Given COI issues, it is likely riddled with WP:OR as well."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SmartSE (talk) 20:33, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Quiness for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Quiness is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Quiness until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SmartSE (talk) 01:27, 25 February 2018 (UTC)