User talk:Altostratus

September 2015
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mailzzang+aus. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Bbb23 (talk) 23:28, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
 * I already reverted you once. If you reinstate the material again, you risk being blocked. The CheckUsers and SPI clerks control what happens on SPIs. If you want to challenge a finding I made, reopening the SPI is not the right place to do it. In any event, it's not a finding against you. If the user I blocked wants to appeal, that's up to them. Drop the stick.--Bbb23 (talk) 23:31, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
 * I also have edit wikipedia long term and distinguish what is correct edit and disruptive. He have intention to apology about his behavior but you don`t care what he said and ignore, you shut down his or them right, they cannot say anything on Wikipedia. So, i substitute their attorney. Please do not ignore and say with me and release them right Sending e-mail, editing own page. Let`s try to talk.--Altostratus (talk) 23:41, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
 * I know that appeal what their want to say is their duty. But you block their right then they can`t appeal anything what they want to say. They sand e-mail to UTRS but not response anymore, and Arbitration too.--Altostratus (talk) 23:46, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
 * I have nothing more to say to you. You think you can act as another user's "attorney". You can't. This is not a court of law. My warning to you stands. You'll have to drop your crusade.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:02, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
 * I know here is not court. The word was just hyperbole. So, what they can do now?--Altostratus (talk) 00:14, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Which account or accounts are you talking about? If their talk page access is revoked, WP:UTRS is their only option, and they'll have to be patient about receiving a response. If their Talk page access is not revoked, then they may create an unblock request on their Talk page.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:19, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
 * I feel bad your are thinking i think i`m crusade and rescue who is second-class citizen. I don`t think that, just helping.--Altostratus (talk) 00:20, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
 * user:mailzzang+aus, user:Orient-Kor. You did not block their own page and e-mail but user:MaxSem did.--Altostratus (talk) 00:23, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
 * The accounts he is talking about are the ones that came out for the sock and meatpuppet parade on this AFD. OhNo itsJamie Talk 00:27, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
 * I know them who they are. So i request to them they don`t have to show break WP:MEAT.--Altostratus (talk) 00:34, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
 * ko:사용자토론:Orient~kowiki--Altostratus (talk) 00:39, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
 * The reason I asked is the account you inserted on the SPI (what I reverted) was neither of those accounts. So, as I said, those two accounts have to go through WP:UTRS and they'll have to be patient. I do not intend to unblock them, and only I or another CheckUser can unblock them.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:52, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Yeah. They did go to WP:UTRS. How long term to response from UTRS? and if that you reverted account is not related with mailzzang, why that account was blocked that reason is related with mailzzang? (I`m not saying Designhavd should be unblock, i guess Designhavd is skillful troller - Unypoly`s sock who is very notorious troller at korean wikiwiki - not only korean wikipedia - and SNS etc. The reason is little complicate to explain so i will explain later when i need) --Altostratus (talk) 01:03, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
 * I don't know if they did it correctly, and I don't know how long it can take, although the page implies it shouldn't take that long. You can try asking your question at Wikipedia talk:Unblock Ticket Request System.--Bbb23 (talk) 04:47, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

Welcome!
To ERICA! I am happy to have another Wikipedian around. Let's do lunch or dinner when I come back to Korea (in late February. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 18:46, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
 * I fail to pass ERICA exam. Sorry.--Altostratus (talk) 15:28, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
 * I am really sorry to hear that. If you come to Ansan for another reason do let me know. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 16:04, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
 * OK, I will.--Altostratus (talk) 16:09, 21 January 2017 (UTC)