User talk:Alucard 16/Archive 9

Women in Red World Contest
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

BB20 C&C section
Well it appears between this and these that someone isn't very happy. The removals in question still violate WP:3RR because she removed part of the material that I restored (this would specifically apply to the part stating whether in whole or in part—counts as a revert). I'm about ready to file a notice at WP:AN/3RR but want to make sure I am correct before I do? The Doctor Who (talk) 09:07, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
 * According to guidelines you are correct because that would technically be the 5th revert within a span of 24 hours and I think you have tried everything you can to resolve the issue so if you feel that the next step would be to file a notice at WP:AN/3RR would be appropriate then you should be okay just don't revert the editor anymore or you too would be in violation of policy as well. I would go the WP:AN/3RR route and leave thier edit alone for now while the dispute is ongoing.  ♪♫Al ucard   16♫♪  09:14, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Got it. Filing momentarily. The Doctor Who  (talk) 09:16, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
 * ✅ here. Sorry that took so long this was my first time filing there (I think, if not its been a while). The Doctor Who  (talk) 09:42, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

NPR Newsletter No.12 30 July 2018
Hello, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!

Overall the June backlog drive was a success, reducing the last 3,000 or so to below 500. However, as expected, 90% of the patrolling was done by less than 10% of reviewers. Since the drive closed, the backlog has begun to rise sharply again and is back up to nearly 1,400 already. Please help reduce this total and keep it from raising further by reviewing some articles each day.
 * June backlog drive


 * New technology, new rules
 * New features are shortly going to be added to the Special:NewPagesFeed which include a list of drafts for review, OTRS flags for COPYVIO, and more granular filter preferences. More details can be found at this page.
 * Probationary permissions: Now that PERM has been configured to allow expiry dates to all minor user rights, new NPR flag holders may sometimes be limited in the first instance to 6 months during which their work will be assessed for both quality and quantity of their reviews. This will allow admins to accord the right in borderline cases rather than make a flat out rejection.
 * Current reviewers who have had the flag for longer than 6 months but have not used the permissions since they were granted will have the flag removed, but may still request to have it granted again in the future, subject to the same probationary period, if they wish to become an active reviewer.


 * Editathons
 * Editathons will continue through August. Please be gentle with new pages that obviously come from good faith participants, especially articles from developing economies and ones about female subjects. Consider using the 'move to draft' tool rather than bluntly tagging articles that may have potential but which cannot yet reside in mainspace.

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. —  Insertcleverphrasehere (or here)  00:00, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
 * The Signpost
 * The next issue of the monthly magazine will be out soon. The newspaper is an excellent way to stay up to date with news and new developments between our newsletters. If you have special messages to be published, or if you would like to submit an article (one about NPR perhaps?), don't hesitate to contact the editorial team here.

NPR Newsletter No.13 18 September 2018
Hello, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!

The New Page Feed currently has 2700 unreviewed articles, up from just 500 at the start of July. For a while we were falling behind by an average of about 40 articles per day, but we have stabilised more recently. Please review some articles from the back of the queue if you can (Sort by: 'Oldest' at Special:NewPagesFeed), as we are very close to having articles older than one month.


 * Project news
 * The New Page Feed now has a new "Articles for Creation" option which will show drafts instead of articles in the feed, this shouldn't impact NPP activities and is part of the WMF's AfC Improvement Project.
 * As part of this project, the feed will have some larger updates to functionality next month. Specifically, ORES predictions will be built in, which will automatically flag articles for potential issues such as vandalism or spam. Copyright violation detection will also be added to the new page feed. See the projects's talk page for more info.


 * There are a number of coordination tasks for New Page Patrol that could use some help from experienced reviewers. See New pages patrol/Coordination for more info to see if you can help out.


 * Other
 * A new summary page of reliable sources has been created; Identifying reliable sources/Perennial sources, which summarizes existing RfCs or RSN discussions about regularly used sources.


 * Moving to Draft and Page Mover
 * Some unsuitable new articles can be best reviewed by moving them to the draft space, but reviewers need to do this carefully and sparingly. It is most useful for topics that look like they might have promise, but where the article as written would be unlikely to survive AfD. If the article can be easily fixed, or if the only issue is a lack of sourcing that is easily accessible, tagging or adding sources yourself is preferable. If sources do not appear to be available and the topic does not appear to be notable, tagging for deletion is preferable (PROD/AfD/CSD as appropriate). See additional guidance at WP:DRAFTIFY.
 * If the user moves the draft back to mainspace, or recreates it in mainspace, please do not re-draftify the article (although swapping it to maintain the page history may be advisable in the case of copy-paste moves). AfC is optional except for editors with a clear conflict of interest.
 * Articles that have been created in contravention of our paid-editing-requirements or written from a blatant NPOV perspective, or by authors with a clear COI might also be draftified at discretion.
 * The best tool for draftification is User:Evad37/MoveToDraft.js(info). Kindly adapt the text in the dialogue-pop-up as necessary (the default can also be changed like this). Note that if you do not have the Page Mover userright, the redirect from main will be automatically tagged as CSD R2, but in some cases it might be better to make this a redirect to a different page instead.
 * The Page Mover userright can be useful for New Page Reviewers; occasionally page swapping is needed during NPR activities, and it helps avoid excessive R2 nominations which must be processed by admins. Note that the Page Mover userright has higher requirements than the NPR userright, and is generally given to users active at Requested Moves. Only reviewers who are very experienced and are also very active reviewers are likely to be granted it solely for NPP activities.

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:11, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

Compile (company)
Thank you for responding to the edit request. Since Legacy of the Wizard is staying in the article after all, a small change would need to be done for the "Publisher" of that game.

"Nihon Game" would need to be changed to either "Namco" (the publisher of that version in Japan) and/or "Broderbund" (the publisher of that same version in North America). I don't have a preference for either Namco or Broderbund, and I'm also fine with the inclusion of both as long as Nihon Falcom is removed as publisher (Falcom is the copyright holder but did not published that version of the game in Japan or North America).

Reference: The one you've just added in the article. http://www.hardcoregaming101.net/legacy-of-the-wizard/

I guess I could have entered another edit request. But with a waiting time of nearly a month for my original edit request to be responded, I'd figure it would be be easier if I came directly to you since the request is quite simply and you are already aware about the page. Thanks in advance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.24.124.252 (talk) 09:01, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done Updated, no worries sorry it took over a month to get it done that has bit of a backlog and I just started to help out there. Video games is one of my area of interests so if you ever need to enter another video game related edit request I'll be on the look out. Happy editing!   ♪♫Al  ucard   16♫♪  09:15, 7 October 2018 (UTC)

JoJo Siwa
Thank you for adding the information to JoJo Siwas page. I made more additions that need added. I will continue to add additional information as it comes available. If possible, please do correct her mothers name/spelling. It is Jessalynn. www.itsjojosiwa.com official celebrity web page KLHam01 (talk) 19:12, 7 October 2018 (UTC)


 * Your welcome glad to help! I went back and checked the sources and the spelling of her mother's name was misspelled in the article I went back and corrected it. Biographies are not my area of expertise but I try to help out where I can. Please be sure to use   when requesting information to be added to the article in the event someone else might get to it before me. Also once your account is at least four days old and you've made at least ten edits to Wikipedia you will be able to edit JoJo Siwa.  ♪♫Al  ucard   16♫♪  19:36, 7 October 2018 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thank you so much !  ♪♫Al ucard   16♫♪  19:36, 7 October 2018 (UTC)

Big Brother (Swedish season 5)
Hello. Name of seasons are currently messed. There can't be both "Big Brother (Swedish season 5)" and "Big Brother 2011" independently. I seen "Big Brother 2012" name on Big Brother website but couldn't confirm it's official name and I don't know about 2011 and 2015 edition. Eurohunter (talk) 21:35, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Hi The article title of   is a standard disambiguation guideline for article naming outlined at WP:TVSEASON that should be followed unless there is a consensus for an exception. This does not mean that it is the official name of that season. Some good examples of this would be The Apprentice (U.S. TV series) and The Celebrity Apprentice. NBC doesn't consider The Celebrity Apprentice a spin-off but a continuation of The Apprentice. So if you go from season six (regular Apprentice) to season seven (Celebrity Apprentice) you'll notice the article titles stay consistent but for the Celebrity seasons the article's lead will clarify the correct title.


 * In the case of most non-English Big Brother series like the Swedish version these articles seem to be lacking in reliable sources when compared to their English counterparts. This makes figuring out the exact naming of each season hard now with the age of the show and even harder when it changes TV networks. This is also why your seeing some information not matching up correctly like Big Brother (Swedish season 6) is the article title while the lead says "Big Brother 2012 is the eighth series of the Swedish version of the reality television series, Big Brother." The main issue here is it looks like some editors are counting the joint editions in the total number of Swedish seasons is the only thing I can think of but its something I haven't had time to research properly. I hope this explanation helps clears some questions up.  ♪♫Al ucard   16♫♪  17:24, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

NPR Newsletter No.14 21 October 2018
Hello, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!

, there are 3650 unreviewed articles and the backlog now stretches back 51 days.
 * Backlog


 * Community Wishlist Proposal
 * There is currently an ongoing discussion regarding the drafting of a Community Wishlist Proposal for the purpose of requesting bug fixes and missing/useful features to be added to the New Page Feed and Curation Toolbar.
 * Please join the conversation as we only have until 29 October to draft this proposal!


 * Project updates
 * ORES predictions are now built-in to the feed. These automatically predict the class of an article as well as whether it may be spam, vandalism, or an attack page, and can be filtered by these criteria now allowing reviewers to better target articles that they prefer to review.
 * There are now tools being tested to automatically detect copyright violations in the feed. This detector may not be accurate all the time, though, so it shouldn't be relied on 100% and will only start working on new revisions to pages, not older pages in the backlog.


 * New scripts
 * User:Enterprisey/cv-revdel.js(info) — A new script created for quickly placing copyvio-revdel on a page.

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. —  Insertcleverphrasehere (or here)  20:49, 21 October 2018 (UTC)

Compile (company) (new request)
Hello. We had an interaction earlier this month (as seen above on your talk page) and told me I could come to you if I had another request regarding this semi-protected page.

On the "Fate" section of the page's infobox, it says the following:

"Bankruptcy, trademark and intellectual property acquired by Compile Heart,..."

While not totally wrong, that statement is still incorrect. Compile Heart signed in 2010 a long term licensing deal with D4 Enterprise to produce new games on Compile's franchises. D4 never anything sold anything outright to Compile Heart; just licensing the Compile IPs to Compile Heart. I think some people (particularly in the west) gave more weight to this deal than it deserves.

Would it be possible for you to replace in the "Fate" section, "Compile Heart" for "D4 Enterprise". Note that I don't have any opinion about Compile Heart remaining in the "Successor" field and will leave that decision to you. But the "Fate" section should not give a false impression that Compile Heart is the actual copyright/trademark owner of the old Compile properties when it is not. Specifying the details about the 2010 deal between D4 and compile Heart would be fine for the text section but too much for the infobox. Which is why I would just mention D4 (and Sega) in the "Fate" section though Compile Heart can stay in the "Sucessor" field. Thanks

References:
 * http://andriasang.com/comqru/compile_hearts_compile/
 * https://web.archive.org/web/20120620194513/http://www.d4e.co.jp/info/media/1/20101028_d4e_newsrelease.pdf — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.24.124.252 (talk) 18:40, 21 October 2018 (UTC)


 * Yes check.svg Done I didn't remove Compile Heart from the "Fate" section but I did add D4 since they have the IP and licensed them to Compile Heart. Sorry about the wait there.  ♪♫Al ucard   16♫♪  14:13, 2 November 2018 (UTC)

NPR Newsletter No.15 16 November 2018
Hello ,
 * Community Wishlist Survey – NPP needs you – Vote NOW
 * Community Wishlist Voting takes place 16 to 30 November for the Page Curation and New Pages Feed improvements, and other software requests. The NPP community is hoping for a good turnout in support of the requests to Santa for the tools we need. This is very important as we have been asking the Foundation for these upgrades for 4 years.


 * If this proposal does not make it into the top ten, it is likely that the tools will be given no support at all for the foreseeable future. So please put in a vote today.


 * We are counting on significant support not only from our own ranks, but from everyone who is concerned with maintaining a Wikipedia that is free of vandalism, promotion, flagrant financial exploitation and other pollution.


 * With all 650 reviewers voting for these urgently needed improvements, our requests would be unlikely to fail. See also The Signpost Special report: 'NPP: This could be heaven or this could be hell for new users – and for the reviewers', and if you are not sure what the wish list is all about, take a sneak peek at an article in this month's upcoming issue of The Signpost which unfortunately due to staff holidays and an impending US holiday will probably not be published until after voting has closed.

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. —  Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 18:37, 16 November 2018 (UTC)

Help in Jewish views on slavery
I found an alternative link for this source but I messed up the format for some reason. Could you help me out, assuming I found the right link to Eli Faber's study? (if not you can revert me) Thanks--יניב הורון (Yaniv) (talk) 13:30, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Reviewing and working on it right now just give me a few minutes  ♪♫Al  ucard   16♫♪  13:39, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
 * ✅ I just skimmed quickly through the reference but it seemed good to me. I corrected the reference the best I could normally I just deal with TV series, films and games lol.  ♪♫Al  ucard   16♫♪  13:55, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Perfect! Have a great week.--יניב הורון (Yaniv) (talk) 19:09, 24 November 2018 (UTC)

2018 in American Television - YES Network
You don’t understand what you’re saying. The current article says:

“The sale would exclude YES Network, which airs New York Yankees, Brooklyn Nets, and the New York Giants and Jets games, that could end up back under full control of the Yankees baseball club, which owns a 20 percent stake, as the Yankees and a sovereign wealth fund have submitted bids for the YES Network.”

The source says:

“New York’s YES Network, which airs New York Yankees, Brooklyn Nets and New York City Football Club games, could end up back under full control of the Yankees baseball club, which owns a 20 percent stake. The Yankees and a sovereign wealth fund have submitted bids for the network, CNBC said.”

So we need to replace “and the New York Giants and Jets games” with “and New York City Football Club” 2601:540:C:50A0:6408:40F4:3C4F:FA3 (talk) 12:31, 29 November 2018 (UTC)


 * I made the change to match the source I apologize for the very, simple misunderstanding. However next time instead of saying "You don’t understand what you’re saying." Try staying "I think you misunderstood the request." It sounds nicer.   Alucard 16  ❯❯❯ chat?    13:03, 29 November 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia penis-attack
Will you write it? ;-) The The Verge article was quite interesting, btw. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 11:14, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
 * LOL that would be fun but I think someone on Talk:Donald Trump suggested that and was turned down because of WP:DENY sadly. I thought the article was interesting as well .   Alucard 16  ❯❯❯ chat?    02:02, 6 December 2018 (UTC)

Big brother template
I don’t agree with you merging on template big brother into season template why are you doing that it doesn’t make any sense pelase take it off. Please say no I beg you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.205.198.217 (talk) 21:55, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
 * I'm not merging them I just simply proposed the idea to the community and other Big Brother editors for discussion because a similar template was recently deleted that was very similar to the three Big Brother templates. If the consensus is to merge then as the nom I will help implement the change however there needs to be a consensus first. If there is no consensus or a consensus to keep then the templates stay as they are. This way is better than having a non-Big Brother editor propose their absolute deletion and all Big Brother articles are left with a generic infobox while other reality shows have a custom infobox. I am not going to rescind the proposal however its better to see how it plays out.   Alucard 16  ❯❯❯ chat?    02:10, 6 December 2018 (UTC)

I think it should stay where it is. I don’t think we should do that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.40.45.122 (talk) 09:10, 6 December 2018 (UTC)

User:Alucard 16 whatever your name is I think it’s better to leave it as I think the housemates status of how many days are better off at the top not in a table in the housemates table ie Bigg Boss i think I have said my reasons and you can’t change it please leave it I am begging you don’t disrupt with ur bad ideas.comment added by 213.205.198.144 (talk) 09:28, 7 December 2018 (UTC)

Tahir Dawar
Hi, please check the article Tahir Dawar. I think it has not being reviewed yet because the article does not appear in Google Search. Thanks, Khestwol (talk) 16:04, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
 * reviewing article now    Alucard 16  ❯❯❯ chat?    16:57, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
 * ✅ with review no major issues I did notice beside the line "Tahir was laid to rest in Hayatabad, Peshawar." the source didn't specify "Hayatabad" as the exact location however I did find a source that was used in the article that did and I went ahead and placed it by that line.    Alucard 16  ❯❯❯ chat?    17:11, 7 December 2018 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated
Hi, I'm MB. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, LNFL, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

MB 23:28, 7 December 2018 (UTC)

User:2k32k
Hi can you block this User he is saying that Bigg Boss 11 is fancruft when is not and plus disrupting the page please block him. And can you protect Bigg Boss 11 for 2 months and get the voting history, vote count and weekly summary back. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.205.198.148 (talk) 10:56, 8 December 2018 (UTC)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.150.219.227 (talk)
 * (I'm not sure which IP I'm talking to here) IP I'm not an admin so I have no power to block or protect anything however for Bigg Boss 11 I reinstated two sections because they are used on other pages without issue. However they maybe challenged and removed in the future because they are poorly sourced and need more reliable sources to ensure verifiability. I did not restore the sections for other Bigg Boss articles because in the edit summaries editors cited that they were poorly sourced. If you would like the page in question to be protected please request that at WP:RFPP. For reporting users to administrators due to vandalism please see WP:AVI for any other reason please see WP:ANI. However in my own honest opinion I honestly don't see anything that did wrong that would warrant a block in relation to Bigg Boss (Hindi season 11). I'm gonna ping  so they know about this btw.    Alucard 16  ❯❯❯ chat?    18:43, 8 December 2018 (UTC)

Take part in a survey
Hi Alucard 16

We're working to measure the value of Wikipedia in economic terms. We want to ask you some questions about how you value being able to edit Wikipedia.

Our survey should take about 10-15 minutes of your time. We hope that you will enjoy it and find the questions interesting. All answers will be kept strictly confidential and will be anonymized before the aggregate results are published. Regretfully, we can only accept responses from people who live in the US due to restrictions in our grant-based funding.

As a reward for your participation, we will randomly pick 1 out of every 5 participants and give them $25 worth of goods of their choice from the Wikipedia store (e.g. Wikipedia themed t-shirts). Note that we can only reward you if you are based in the US.

Click here to access the survey: https://mit.co1.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_eXJcEhLKioNHuJv

Thanks

Avi

Researcher, MIT Initiative on the Digital Economy --Avi gan (talk) 00:54, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
 * ✅ very interesting survey.    Alucard 16  ❯❯❯ chat?    02:18, 11 December 2018 (UTC)

Big Brother Templates
If, or more likely when, this: Templates for discussion/Log/2018 December 5 is passed; I know it will take quite a while to change out all the templates from the current to the new. So I'll volunteer to take care of U.S. and Canada (at least English) articles considering those are what I'm most familiar with and could probably get through them faster than those less familiar. It'll at least allow you to focus your attention on other editions. The Doctor Who (talk) 02:22, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks ! That's a big help! I think said they would get Pinoy Big Brother. I honestly don't forsee it to be a hard change to implement regardless of format used more of a long tedious change since Big Brother endgame is used on over 300+ articles. I've looked at several different versions and it seems like a straightforward change to implement.    Alucard 16  ❯❯❯ chat?    03:15, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
 * I created a sandbox so that I could go ahead and begin. Quick question I thought of as I was going through some of these, should the infobox be using "houseguest" as for example list of articles use or "HouseGuest" as actually used throughout the article including episode summaries? The Doctor Who  (talk) 03:50, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Actually I have been thinking about that and I honestly for the articles I think we should adopt the current way CBS, Global, the press and the production team uses the term which is "Houseguests" As far as the infobox module goes the lowercase "housemates" and "houseguests" should be used instead as that seems to be the preferred Manual of Style in general for infoboxes. A good example would be Infobox television Survivor which has "castaways" all lowercase in the infobox. For the special prizes like AFJ and AFH I think it should be formatted as "America's Favorite Juror" and "America's Favorite Houseguest" respectively since those are proper titles. Also for BB:OTT we shouldn't have filming dates since that aired live (unless you planned on removing them then ignore this last comment lol).    Alucard 16  ❯❯❯ chat?    04:06, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Now that this has been closed we should be about ready to implement the changes. But before we do, the module should be moved to the template space correct? Also, if it helps you, I'm watching your talk page now so you don't need to ping me every time . The Doctor Who  (talk) 01:00, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks I left a message on 's talk page about the result of the discussion. I would recommend waiting on him to get the new module sorted and working just in case it required a change is to Infobox television season to work and that one is template protected and he has the rights to edit those.    Alucard 16  ❯❯❯ chat?    01:06, 14 December 2018 (UTC)

NPR Newsletter No.16 15 December 2018
Hello ,

This year's award for the Reviewer of the Year goes to. Around on Wikipedia since 2011, their staggering number of 26,554reviews over the past twelve months makes them, together with an additional total of 275,285edits, one of Wikipedia's most prolific users.
 * Reviewer of the Year
 * Thanks are also extended for their work to (15,059 reviews),  (12,760reviews),  (9,001reviews),  (8,440reviews),  (8,092reviews),   (5,306reviews),  (4,153 reviews),  (4,016reviews),  and  (3,615reviews)., , , and  have been New Page Reviewers for less than a year — Barkeep49 for only sevenmonths, while , with an edit count of 250,000 since she joined Wikipedia in 2008, has been a bastion of New Page Patrol for many years.

See also the list of top100 reviewers.

The backlog is now approaching 5,000, and still rising. There are around 640holders of the NPR flag, most of whom appear to be inactive. The 10% of the reviewers who do 90% of the work could do with some support especially as some of them are now taking a well deserved break.
 * Less good news, and an appeal for some help

At #1 position, the Community Wishlist poll closed on 3December with a resounding success for NPP, reminding the WMF and the volunteer communities just how critical NPP is to maintaining a clean encyclopedia and the need for improved tools to do it. A big 'thank you' to everyone who supported the NPP proposals. See the results.
 * Really good news - NPR wins the Community Wishlist Survey 2019

Due to a number of changes having been made to the feed since this three-minutevideo was created, we have been asked by the WMF for feedback on the video with a view to getting it brought up to date to reflect the new features of the system. Please leave your comments here, particularly mentioning how helpful you find it for new reviewers. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:14, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Training video

Listing of presenters/judges
Just a quick question, should we be separating the judges/presenters into current and former on the infoboxes? MSalmon (talk) 22:33, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
 * From my understanding that is against MOS:DONTHIDE and shouldn't be done. I'm pinging in on this as he brought up a similar discussion a while back about the Big Brother sidebars used on some parent articles like Big Brother (U.S. TV series) and Big Brother (UK TV series). TBH The X Factor (UK TV series), American Idol and Survivor (U.S. TV series) are some good examples how the infobox on parent articles should look. I created an comparison on how Big Brother (U.S. TV series) could look if the custom sidebar (which doesn't adhere to MOS:DONTHIDE) was replaced with Infobox television here. I hope this answers the question.    Alucard 16  ❯❯❯ chat?    08:18, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Basically what Alucard 16 said. Per [MOS:DONTHIDE]] content on Wikipedia content pages should not be hidden by default. If you were asking for the BB sidebar template, then that is an even bigger issue, as sidebars "infobox" don't appear for mobile users. --Gonnym (talk) 08:38, 7 January 2019 (UTC)

Farmen articles/Big Brother endgame templates
Is there a date where the big brother endgame template will be discontinued? I understand why it's being done, I just need to know when the deletion of the endgame template will happen around. Cheers. --Nintenga (talk) 22:49, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
 * There is no set date but it will be a while as this template is used on 300+ articles still.   Alucard 16  ❯❯❯ chat?    23:20, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Just to add/correct Alucard here. The TfD discussion has no provisions of first moving the missing data from the endgame template to the article table, however since Alucard and others are actively doing so, we are doing it slowly. If at any point this process stops, the changing of the template can be completed in a day with a simple operation. So basically, if you are using that template on any article, you should replace it. --Gonnym (talk) 10:51, 12 January 2019 (UTC)

BB templates
Is anyone else but you replacing the infobox for Big Brother? If no one is working, there is no reason to wait for the info to be converted to a table, as that isn't part of the requirement of the TfD outcome. As long as the old template still exists, people will keep reverting to it. --Gonnym (talk) 19:17, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
 * I know defiantly is converting the American and English Canadian articles to the new infobox and table. I have seen  working on converting Pinoy Big Brother articles.  has been converting other editions no one has discussed like the German, Russian, etc. Each of them seem to be converting the Days/Results into a table as they go along with no reverts that I can see. The only article that has been a problem has been Gran Hermano VIP (season 6) which was converted while it was in progress and supposed to be using Template:Big Brother housemates.    Alucard 16  ❯❯❯ chat?    23:27, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Correction with some American articles it seems is working on the table while  is working on replacing the infobox.    Alucard 16  ❯❯❯ chat?    23:32, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Just a quick update, all U.S. articles have new HouseGuests tables except for CBB1 which I'll take care of now. I've done a few of them but NintendoGeek has done the rest. As far as the Infoboxes all seasons except for 1-5 have them and I plan on taking care of those later tonight. The Doctor Who  (talk) 01:20, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
 * I just converted Pinoy Big Brother: Otso and Bigg Boss Kannada (season 6) over to the new module. Big Brother housemates can be deleted as no articles are using it now.   Alucard 16  ❯❯❯ chat?    04:27, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Big Brother housemates has been nominated for deletion at WP:TfD The Doctor Who  (talk) 04:58, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Big Brother endgame2 is now orphaned I just converted Big Brother (Serbian season 4) and Big Brother (Serbian season 5) over to the module and they were the only articles using that one. isn't there an easier way of having Big Brother housemates and Big Brother endgame2 instead of having to do another discussion? I thought we were to move them to the "Ready for deletion" section over at the holding cell.    Alucard 16  ❯❯❯ chat?    09:11, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
 * I was on that page and completely missed that section, my apologies. I believe that you're correct. The Doctor Who  (talk) 09:16, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Ah its okay no worries I was a little unsure that I was reading the instructions correctly until I saw  deleted Big Brother endgame2 lol. Maybe since your the nom for the discussion for Big Brother housemates you could revoke that nom and just let the process at the holding cell take care of it?    Alucard 16  ❯❯❯ chat?    09:31, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Nice, good job guys. I was asking as I had to revert twice a user at Big Brother (UK series 19). --Gonnym (talk) 10:54, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks!  ah that seems to be the exception to the rule for now. I haven't seen much issue with the implementation except at Gran Hermano VIP (season 6). Other than those two pages it seems the transition is going smoothly from what I can tell. I haven't seen any issues with the Celebrity Big Brother UK series 1-7 articles I moved over to the new template. After these next two days of work IRL I will be able to wrap up the British articles pretty quickly so all will look uniform then finish Gran Hermano as well.    Alucard 16  ❯❯❯ chat?    11:41, 5 January 2019 (UTC)

As a side note (I know it's unrelated) but I'd like to convert series overview tables, like the one at Big Brother (U.S. TV series) over to using Series overview. I'm in the process of converting that one now at User:TheDoctorWho/sandbox. Thoughts? The Doctor Who (talk) 21:38, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
 * I've not seen this used on reality shows before but that is an interesting idea actually looks good to me so far.   Alucard 16  ❯❯❯ chat?    22:15, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
 * I've implemented the tables in the respective section and I don't think it looks too bad. The Doctor Who (talk) 08:13, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
 * I think it looks good but its a bit weird seeing the premier/finale dates at the end but I guess that is how the template is set up. I think you possibly opened up another can of worms for reality TV series that use a custom overview table.  your the WP:TV template expert here what do you think of this idea and how its implemented on Big Brother (U.S. TV series)? It does bring reality unscripted shows like this in line with their scripted counterparts.    Alucard 16  ❯❯❯ chat?    08:44, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Looks great. It's always better to get a consistent style going across all related articles, that way if a need arises, it can be better evaluated to see how many pages need it. --Gonnym (talk) 10:53, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Any idea of why the naming of the U.S. articles is different to the other ones? MSalmon (talk) 10:55, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
 * The American version and Secret Story (Portuguese TV series) have a unique disambiguation because of the numbers in the names of the season that was reached via consensus through RMs. See here for the American RM and here for the Portuguese RM. Its essentially a compromise between WP:BIGBRO's old naming convention and WP:NCTV's guidelines for these seasons.   Alucard 16  ❯❯❯ chat?    11:00, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
 * So do the infobox titles for each season need to match the name of the article? MSalmon (talk) 11:02, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
 * I believe so in situations like the UK version it automatically done when the values are entered correctly. In cases like the US version they have to be manually entered because the US disambiguation is not standard but still the US infobox titles has to match the article title for the italicize feature to work properly.   Alucard 16  ❯❯❯ chat?    11:08, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
 * I have changed a few of the U.S. infobox titles and the italics still work even though I did it using the same as the UK infoboxes MSalmon (talk) 11:14, 6 January 2019 (UTC).
 * I've actually noticed the infobox title issue also and was going to raise it in the next few days over at the infobox, once I implement my current sandbox changes. For some reason, the title was implemented with all the disambiguation which just doesn't look good (and shouldn't be connected to how the prev/next work). I'll ping this conversation when I start it so you can comment there. --Gonnym (talk) 11:18, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
 * I see what you mean with the infobox now hump will wait to see what Gonnym has up his sleeve on this as I'm perplexed. However for the main series for the American adaptation the season articles are named based on their WP:COMMONNAME for seasons 9, 11-present and for their actual names for seasons 1-8 and 10.
 * From my understanding infobox title at least should say Big Brother # for all the main series seasons for consistency. Like I pointed out in the RM even CBS goes back at times and reverts to calling seasons 11-20 by the old naming standard. So the naming Big Brother # is also correct for seasons 11-20 even though their logos omit the number. Season 20 was very evident of this where production used the name Big Brother 20 in a variety of ways last year.
 * The celebrity series was moved on a technicality basis and could see another possible move after the second season premiers to see how CBS and the production team handles this season as far as naming goes since the WP:COMMONNAME that applies to the main season articles won't necessarily apply to the celebrity articles (unless the press all calls it Celebrity Big Brother 2 and it is the most searched term for the season). There just isn't enough information after 1 season airs to determine a proper naming convention and after the first celebrity season experienced three moves on its name alone I didn't feel like sending it through another RM to rename it Celebrity Big Brother (U.S. season 1) just to have CBS do something totally left field and add the number back to the logo on January 21st which would have triggered another RM while the second season was in progress.   Alucard 16  ❯❯❯ chat?    12:13, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Hey just wanted to get a status update on BBUS/CAN from what I can tell BBUS is done and BBCAN is the only English BB left to convert is that right? I have BBUK and BBAU all done.    Alucard 16  ❯❯❯ chat?    18:01, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Unless I'm missing something that is correct. The Doctor Who  (talk) 06:19, 16 January 2019 (UTC)

How Big Brother works
Question: Do winners of the US seasons get voted by other members of the house and by viewers at home? --Gonnym (talk) 10:54, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
 * For the American version only in Big Brother 1 (U.S. season) and Big Brother: Over the Top is where the viewers vote for who they want to evict. Our regular format is the Housemates vote to evict their own and decide the winner themselves. If a Housemate voluntarily leaves or is removed late in the season then the viewing public gets 1 vote to win in the final to fill the missing spot like in Big Brother 11 (U.S. season). The English Canadian version has adopted our standard format and follows our rules for the most part.   Alucard 16  ❯❯❯ chat?    11:12, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
 * oh, that makes sense now. The Israeli version is the only one I know and the public is the only one who votes. The US version then must have a very different dynamic and tactics, as here they play on what the public wants and could care less if other houseguests like them or not. --Gonnym (talk) 11:18, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
 * A lot of the international versions like the Israeli version is modeled off the British adaptation which makes sense cause the British adaptation was like that as well. A lot of other international versions like the Serbian and Bulgarian series has gone so far to reuse the British logos and opening credits. The American version changed format starting with the our second season because the original format didn't work out so well here. CBS brought in new producers and they re-tooled it to be like Survivor in a house with live feeds. In the American version we do get to vote for our favorite Housemate at the end to win a smaller prize than the winner and runner-up.   Alucard 16  ❯❯❯ chat?    11:28, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
 * A lot of times what happens in the Israeli version is that one or more houseguests just stop participating in what they don't want to because they know the public likes them, so they keep getting nominated by other members, but never voted off. It creates very boring TV. --Gonnym (talk) 11:32, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
 * That has happened in the British version as well. That's one of the reasons our format changed after season one was due to the viewers voting out all the exciting houseguests when they were up for eviction leaving the not so exciting ones. Sometimes our format though can be less than exciting like when everyone wants to vote with the houseguest that is the Head of Household or all vote the same person out. It gets boring when they don't want to upset the one in power that week lol.   Alucard 16  ❯❯❯ chat?    12:13, 6 January 2019 (UTC)

Template:Big Brother endgame/color
Big Brother China is the only article that uses Template:Big Brother endgame/color, could you see why this is? --Gonnym (talk) 09:00, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Sure no problem.   Alucard 16  ❯❯❯ chat?    09:05, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
 * ✅ fixed it was the Big Brother China section. The first table had  to make the rows all one color. I replaced them with the equivalent   to remove Template:Big Brother endgame/color from the article.    Alucard 16  ❯❯❯ chat?    09:13, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Nice, I wasn't sure what templates replaced those. So we've officially got rid of BB and Survivor templates. Now just some after-move cleanups. --Gonnym (talk) 09:14, 16 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Awesome, that shouldn't be much trouble now.   Alucard 16  ❯❯❯ chat?    09:22, 16 January 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 19
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Celebrity Big Brother 2 (U.S. season), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CBS Studios ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Celebrity_Big_Brother_2_%28U.S._season%29 check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Celebrity_Big_Brother_2_%28U.S._season%29?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 19 January 2019 (UTC)

Email that I couldn't send
Hey. I tried to email you, but you haven't enabled it. I just wanted to let you know that you might have exposed some pii when trying to make a specific edit. I'm not going into detail in case this was a mistake and you want it oversighted, but if you want to email me I can show you where --DannyS712 (talk) 22:55, 25 January 2019 (UTC)

Bigg Boss 7 and Bigg Boss 8
Hi User:Alucard 16 I just want to say just like other seasons can you please put the nomination table on Bigg Boss 7 and Bigg Boss 8. I tried but its keep getting reverted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DipikaKum123 (talk • contribs) 10:28, January 26, 2019 (UTC)
 * I will look at them when I am home tonight and fix them. --  Alucard 16 Public  ❯❯❯ chat?    22:23, 26 January 2019 (UTC)

The Big Break
Do you know anything about The Big Break series? --Gonnym (talk) 20:50, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Unfortunately no I don't know much about this one but I can research it.   Alucard 16  ❯❯❯ chat?    21:10, 30 January 2019 (UTC)

Hazel O'Sullivan et al
What is the point of you changing that many redirect targets? Just move the article. Bots will automatically fix double redirects.-- Laun chba ller 11:05, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Simply put I was unaware that enwiki had a bot that performs this work automatically. I was just following the post-move instructions about clean-up which instructed to check "What links here" and fix them.   Alucard 16  ❯❯❯ chat?    21:11, 30 January 2019 (UTC)

Big Brother Infoboxe starring parameter
Have we thought about adding the HouseGuests names in the starring parameter in the Infoboxes? I mean technically they're "starring" in the season.

I don't think that it's too bad with 12 HGs but it could get rather lengthy in a regular season when 12 becomes 17 and all the other parameters are filled out.

So we could always go for something simpler like a link to the HG section?

Either way I still think it's worth a consideration. Thoughts? The Doctor Who (talk) 02:08, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Well tbh the majority of reality shows don't use this field and with Big Brother there have been seasons with close to 60 Housemates (like the fifth German season) and the Philippines tends to have an estimate of 25-35 per season now where they do multiple batches. For seasons with 20+ Housemates this would make the infobox too long also the field could be a source of edit warring. Instead of editors following the guidelines which is to list them in the order they are credited (easy for BBUSA/CAN) or alphabetically for versions where this doesn't exist (BBUK). I can see editors warring by trying to use this field as a status update. Rearranging them based on when they left the House, putting "(Evicted)" beside their name, etc. One of the things that can be done is move the "HouseGuest" section to the top then have production, episodes, voting history and reception.   Alucard 16  ❯❯❯ chat?    20:16, 1 February 2019 (UTC)

Big Brother Africa (season 5)
Hi, this user - Hullaballoo Wolfowitz removed housemates' "Secret" from "Format" section, says that they were "unsourced and laced with garbage". Secret is one of a major twist on BBA5. I added the housemates' profile page on the official site as the source (like BB Israel wiki usually did), which their profile each contained their Secret. But the user removed again, says cut-and-paste copyvios. I don't exactly know what that means, and why it was removed again after I added the sources. --A675974811 (talk) 1:24, 19 February 2019 (UTC+8)
 * I tried fixing it in accordance with WP:COPYQUOTE and I started a discussion at Talk:Big Brother Africa (season 5) about the issue. We'll see how this works.   Alucard 16  ❯❯❯ chat?    19:14, 18 February 2019 (UTC)

Arman Loni
Hi, please check the article Arman Loni. I think it has not being reviewed yet because the article does not appear in Google Search. Thanks, Khestwol (talk) 14:13, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
 * The article hasn't been reviewed yet. It seems to have been in the NPP queue for about 9 days now. I will try to review it but can't make no promises due to real life.   Alucard 16  ❯❯❯ chat?    07:47, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the response. Have a good day, Khestwol (talk) 14:39, 25 February 2019 (UTC)

Edit request at Talk:Advertising
Hi, this is regarding change in Advertisement page. All I am requesting is to add citation suggested by me. I am very new to Wikipedia and catching up how editing works. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hiten Jha (talk • contribs) 12:32, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Ah okay just making sure thanks for the quick reply! Welcome to Wikipedia I hope you enjoy editing here ! I'll re-review the edit request here in a bit.   Alucard 16  ❯❯❯ chat?    12:38, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
 * ✅ I added the sources to the article . In the future to keep a discussion in one place please reply at the article talk page. You can use  to ping the editor your replying to and they will get a notice by the system.    Alucard 16  ❯❯❯ chat?    12:53, 7 March 2019 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Sockpuppet investigations/MishMoshKeel121
Just wanted to thank you for the ping.--Bbb23 (talk) 14:53, 7 March 2019 (UTC)

Eurovision Song Contest 2019
It seems everything is OK now. Many thanks for your input, you truly made a difference! Can’t thank you enough for your the ideas you brought in! 🙂 「Robster1983」 ☞ Life's short, talk fast ☜ 19:39, 12 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks so much glad to help! Thanks for your hard work on Eurovision articles as well!    Alucard 16  ❯❯❯ chat?    23:42, 14 March 2019 (UTC)

NPR Newsletter No.17


Hello ,


 * News
 * The WMF has announced that Google Translate is now available for translating articles through the content translation tool. This may result in an increase in machine translated articles in the New Pages Feed. Feel free to use the tag and gently remind (or inform) editors that translations from other language Wikipedia pages still require attribution per WP:TFOLWP.


 * Discussions of interest
 * Two elements of CSD G6 have been split into their own criteria: R4 for redirects in the "File:" namespace with the same name as a file or redirect at Wikimedia Commons (Discussion), and G14 for disambiguation pages which disambiguate zero pages, or have "(disambiguation)" in the title but disambiguate a single page (Discussion).
 * db-blankdraft was merged into G13 (Discussion)
 * A discussion recently closed with no consensus on whether to create a subject-specific notability guideline for theatrical plays.
 * There is an ongoing discussion on a proposal to create subject-specific notability guidelines for chemicals and organism taxa.


 * Reminders
 * NPR is not a binary keep / delete process. In many cases a redirect may be appropriate. The deletion policy and its associated guideline clearly emphasise that not all unsuitable articles must be deleted. Redirects are not contentious. See a classic example of the templates to use. More templates are listed at the R template index. Reviewers who are not aware, do please take this into consideration before PROD, CSD, and especially AfD  because not even all admins are aware of such policies, and many NAC do not have a full knowledge of them.


 * NPP Tools Report
 * Superlinks – allows you to check an article's history, logs, talk page, NPP flowchart (on unpatrolled pages) and more without navigating away from the article itself.
 * copyvio-check – automatically checks the copyvio percentage of new pages in the background and displays this info with a link to the report in the 'info' panel of the Page curation toolbar.
 * The NPP flowchart now has clickable hyperlinks.

Six Month Queue Data: Today – Low – 2393 High – 4828 Looking for inspiration? There are approximately 1000 female biographies to review. Stay up to date with even more news – subscribe to The Signpost.

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:18, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

FR30799386's User Scripts
Dear all. Recently, was blocked for sock puppetry. Among their projects were a number of user scripts that they left behind. I (DannyS712) have copied the scripts, and have taken over maintaining them. You currently import one or more of FR30799386's scripts, and I thought that you might want to import a maintained version. Links to each script are provided below.


 * User:DannyS712/communicator
 * User:DannyS712/copyvio-check
 * User:DannyS712/Undo
 * User:DannyS712/Quick-undo
 * User:DannyS712/Readonly
 * User:DannyS712/Redirectify
 * User:DannyS712/Section-strike

If you have any questions, please reach out and talk to me. --DannyS712 (talk) 03:57, 21 March 2019 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 March 2019
 * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:02, 31 March 2019 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – April 2019
News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2019).

Administrator changes
 * Gnome-colors-view-refresh.svg Reaper Eternal • ThaddeusB
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Bogdangiusca • Christopher Parham • Necrothesp • Schneelocke • Siroxo • Sarah
 * Pictogram voting rename.png →

Interface administrator changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Mr. Stradivarius

Bureaucrat changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-add.svg DeltaQuad
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Kingturtle

Technical news
 * In Special:Preferences under "Appearance" → "Advanced options", there is now an option to show a confirmation prompt when clicking on a rollback link.
 * The Wikimedia Foundation's Community health initiative plans to design and build a new user reporting system to make it easier for people experiencing harassment and other forms of abuse to provide accurate information to the appropriate channel for action to be taken. Please see meta:Community health initiative/User reporting system consultation 2019 to provide your input on this idea.

Arbitration
 * The Arbitration Committee clarified that the General 1RR prohibition for Palestine-Israel articles may only be enforced on pages with the ARBPIA 1RR editnotice edit notice.

Miscellaneous
 * Two more administrator accounts were compromised. Evidence has shown that these attacks, like previous incidents, were due to reusing a password that was used on another website that suffered a data breach. If you have ever used your current password on any other website, you should change it immediately. All admins are strongly encouraged to enable two-factor authentication, please consider doing so. Please always practice appropriate account security by ensuring your password is secure and unique to Wikimedia.
 * As a reminder, according to WP:NOQUORUM, administrators looking to close or relist an AfD should evaluate a nomination that has received few or no comments as if it were a proposed deletion (PROD) prior to determining whether it should be relisted.

Discuss this newsletter

Subscribe

Archive Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:56, 7 April 2019 (UTC)

Infobox
Hi, I have left a message on the CBB USA talk page about the infobox, feel free to have a look and tell me what you think. MSalmon (talk) 09:54, 21 April 2019 (UTC)

Mermaid (1964 short film)
Please, can you help me with this article? I wanted to create it myself, but I'm too busy. Thank you very much. --79.16.239.231 14:41, 24 April 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.16.239.231 (talk)

The Signpost: 30 April 2019
 * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:36, 30 April 2019 (UTC)