User talk:Alukoseyi

Your submission at Articles for creation: Babafemi Raji (June 5)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Babafemi Raji and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Babafemi_Raji Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:KylieTastic&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Babafemi_Raji reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 18:39, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Babafemi Raji for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Babafemi Raji is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Babafemi Raji until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  Velella  Velella Talk 15:48, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

July 2019
Hello, I'm Lapablo. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Lapablo (talk) 20:14, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

Transparency notice
For the sake of transparency, I have given the following advice via IRC after receiving an explanation in #wikipedia-en-help.

I'll need to assume that you are saying the truth. If what you have said before is untrue, it will be noticed, and that won't be good. If you are saying the truth, you are currently blocked because you have made edits that are similar (or identical) to a blocked user's contributions. You will need to explain that: a) You are not the blocked person "Anthony Babafemi Raji" b) You will not edit the article "Amaju Pinnick" directly again c) Exactly what you have said here in the chat ((nonpublic quote removed)) if you fail to explain this properly, you won't be unblocked, so take your time to get this right.

~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:17, 24 July 2019 (UTC)

Unblock discussion
That is not entirely forthcoming. There is obviously more. Please see WP:MEAT  Dlohcierekim (talk) 20:21, 24 July 2019 (UTC)

Please read User:dlohcierekim/ew and relate the information there to your own editing.

Please read WP:42 and relate it to your own editing. Dlohcierekim (talk) 20:27, 24 July 2019 (UTC)

You have said you will not edit about Amaju Pinnick. Please describe what edits you would make. Dlohcierekim (talk) 20:31, 24 July 2019 (UTC)


 * No, please don't ask an admin for editing. Please address the issues I have raised here. You only need one unblock request at a time. Please modify one or the other.  Dlohcierekim (talk) 21:12, 24 July 2019 (UTC)

I will like to edit Information Technology Area. Reliable sources that are relation to Wikipedia standard news paper local and online.

Edit warring is a behavior, typically exemplified by the use of confrontational edits to win a content dispute. It is different than a bold, revert, discuss (BRD) cycle and I promise I will never do that again, Administrator should please use this as a warning to me and unblock me , It will never happen again.

Ublock Request
My account alukoseyi is not a sock puppet and I would like to be unblocked, I am not the blocked person “ Anthony Babafemi Raji” I was helping Anthony Babafemi Raji to create his wikipedia page, I only have one account)which explained to User: TobeFree, Please I will not edit the article “Amaju Pinnick” directly again and please help me separate my account from Anthony Babafemi Raji wikipedia page.

will like to edit Information Technology Area. Reliable sources that are relation to Wikipedia standard news paper local and online.

Edit warring is a behavior, typically exemplified by the use of confrontational edits to win a content dispute. It is different than a bold, revert, discuss (BRD) cycle and I promise I will never do that again, Administrator should please use this as a warning to me and unblock me , It will never happen again.