User talk:Alvaro Filbert

{| width="100%" style="background:transparent"
 * style="width: 50%; border:1px solid #084080; background-color:#F5FFFA; vertical-align:top"|

Stop
Please stop creating inappropriate chemistry articles. You have already been blocked for this disruptive editing. Why continue do to exactly the same thing again now that the block has expired? ChemNerd (talk) 10:55, 22 June 2012 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for your continued disruptive behavior. In addition to continuing to create inappropriate articles, some of your unreferenced additions to other articles have contained factual errors. If you wish to be unblocked, I would like you to agree to consult WikiProject Chemistry or WikiProject Chemicals before creating any new articles. Also, I would like to ask you to please be careful about the information that you are adding to chemistry articles - erroneous information is more harmful to Wikipedia than a lack of information. -- Ed (Edgar181) 12:46, 22 June 2012 (UTC). If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. .


 * We appreciate your interest in creating new articles about chemistry. However, it is important that you create appropriate articles.  Many of the articles you have created have been problematic for various reasons.   Many have already been deleted.  To prevent these problems in the future, please consult with either WikiProject Chemistry or WikiProject Chemicals before creating any more new articles.  If you are willing to do this, then I am willing to unblock you.  -- Ed (Edgar181) 14:13, 23 June 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Uranium pentaiodide for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Uranium pentaiodide is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Uranium pentaiodide until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DMacks (talk) 13:40, 28 May 2021 (UTC)

"Diphosphorus trisulfide" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Diphosphorus trisulfide and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 May 16 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 1234qwer1234qwer4 11:19, 16 May 2022 (UTC)