User talk:Alvars Dzenis

October 2023
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Nuremberg Laws, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 05:09, 8 October 2023 (UTC)

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Walther PP. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Loafiewa (talk) 07:39, 8 October 2023 (UTC)


 * Fortunately for me that the information is a known fact. Though there are many that have differing opinions, my contribution is a known, but not taught, fact. Your " neutral point of view policy" has been greatly compromised. Example: Many articles contain the words, "Donald Trump falsely claimed election fraud." Reality: Election Fraud is very present and convictions on the matter have been registered for the 2020 Presidential election. Thus Election Fraud claims were accurate. If the policy of neutrality is just and fair, then this wouldn't exist. Wiki needs to decide on whether they are a "publisher" or a "platform". They cannot be both. Alvars Dzenis (talk) 03:18, 13 October 2023 (UTC)

October 2023
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Tony Stewart have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:10, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Tony Stewart was changed by Alvars Dzenis (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.906544 on 2023-10-31T00:10:34+00:00

March 2024
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ruby Ridge. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Fred Zepelin (talk) 23:12, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.


 * The information submitted is 100% accurate and is public knowledge. I WAS THERE! If you continue to promote false information, you will lose all your privileges on this site. You have been officially warned!! Alvars Dzenis (talk) 20:21, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
 * If you were there, please read WP:COI. Fred Zepelin (talk) 00:17, 7 March 2024 (UTC)

May 2024
This is your only warning; if you add defamatory content to Wikipedia again, as you did at Gigi Hadid, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.  Liliana UwU  (talk / contributions) 22:53, 3 May 2024 (UTC)


 * I corrected inaccuracies. This is your first and ONLY warning. If your inaccuracies are not corrected immedialetly, You will be expelled from Wikipedia. Your "Colorful" description of a bill is RACIST!! You have been reported!! Even though "media" has painted it as an "anti-muslim" bill, this was an anti terrorist association bill which is very different. Wikipedia will be looking into your racist point of view. If you just stick to the FACTS, you'll be ok. STOP WITH THE HATE!!! Alvars Dzenis (talk) 08:14, 4 May 2024 (UTC)