User talk:Alvations

Speedy deletion nomination of SemEval


A tag has been placed on SemEval requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. &mdash; Timneu22 · &#32; talk 16:52, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Senseval-3


Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Senseval-3. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - SemEval. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will to continue helping improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at SemEval - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. ukexpat (talk) 17:24, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

Discussion at the Adminstrators' noticeboard
You're being discussed here. You may wish to contribute. -Atmoz (talk) 17:27, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of SemEval-1


A tag has been placed on SemEval-1 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. &mdash; Timneu22 · &#32; talk 17:30, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of SemEval-1 for deletion
A discussion has begun about whether the article SemEval-1, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/SemEval-1 until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. &mdash; Timneu22 · &#32; talk 17:47, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 19:11, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of SemEval for deletion
A discussion has begun about whether the article SemEval, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/SemEval until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. &mdash; Timneu22 · &#32; talk 21:04, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Just a quick message for you. I've got no opinion on whether or not your article should be deleted, but I want to make sure you know I'm not out to get you.  I explained my comments over at ANI, and in hindsight I should have put it that way in the first place.  If I get some time tonight, I'll see if I can work on this, and I'll try to find something to establish notability; if you have something that does, put it in.  I often come across as far more abrasive than I intend, for reasons that are somewhat beyond my control, so I don't want to burn bridges.  You can respond here or leave me a note at my talkpage; I won't be around for at least the next 3 1/2-4 hours, but I will respond as soon as I can.  The Blade of the Northern Lights  ( 話して下さい ) 21:21, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

Heads-up about Semeval
Hi Alvations,

I know you've been working hard to try to improve the pages you added! Sorry you haven't met with the warmest welcome. Have you found the WP:Notability policy yet, to understand what people expect to see in articles? Let me know if I can give you a hand.

Sorry that the wikify conversation spun out--I don't think the individual workshop pages are helpful but I hope SemEval will stay. To try to improve the article, I've done some work on the SemEval article and moved content to the Talk page where I removed large chunks. There's still a lot more work needed; remember, this is a general encyclopedia. Also remember that Wikipedia is collaborative--just because you started an article, doesn't mean that you have to do it all. Jodi.a.schneider (talk)


 * Hello again. I keep checking into Semeval and noticed that you've added a lot of stuff to your userpage. Welcome to Wikipedia! Do you know about the history feature? All the revisions of SemEval are in its page history. Jodi.a.schneider (talk) 17:33, 11 November 2010 (UTC)


 * @Jodi, thanks for the concern. no worries about the history page. i knew about it. *blink, i did it on purpose as an easter egg kind of thing... hahahaa... though new to wiki, i ain't no noob to the crude computing world. hahahahaa, since the day IBM fall and PC becomes a reality, my geekness precedes that.
 * hahaha... just being a little off because it's 2am here and i'm kinda high and this is my own talkpage so i could say anything, (i think). hope you arent offended. i know about the history feature and people can revert them, but the closest thing to ownership on wiki is my own user page so i left it there for people to see. it's kind of cool though.
 * Cool. :) Jodi.a.schneider (talk) 11:53, 12 November 2010 (UTC)

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference
Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to  in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being 'minor'. The only thing that's changed is that you will no longer have them marked as minor by default.

For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you are familiar with the contents of WP:MINOR, and believe that it is still beneficial to the encyclopedia to have all your edits marked as such by default, then this discussion will give you the details you need to continue with this functionality indefinitely. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 19:35, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

File:Semantic dictionary jpg.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Semantic dictionary jpg.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. :Jay8g Hi!- I am... -What I do... WASH- BRIDGE- WPWA - MFIC- WPIM 05:10, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

Redirect blanking
Hi, if you have an issue with a redirect that doesn't qualify for speedy deletion, please take it to Redirects for discussion rather than blank the page as you did with Long-distance dependencies. Thanks! -- KTC (talk) 10:06, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

Open vs licensed Wordnets
Just saw your section in Wordnet, this might interest you: http://linguistics.okfn.org/ (if you sign up to the mailing list, we really appreciate, if people send short welcome messages) SebastianHellmann (talk) 17:23, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for the invitation to the mailing list! Licensing had always been an issue to resources in NLP =) 175.156.83.176 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 13:42, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

Edit away
Hi! I had to temporarily revert your works at Word-sense disambiguation. There were no little edit summaries to consider. With all due respect, would you please say a bit at the new section of the article talk page I opened up for us? Let's get your work back online with a few lines of consideration for the watchers. (See History page for the link to "number of watchers".) Thanks, and Happy editing! &mdash; Cp i r al Cpiral  18:01, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 21
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Classic monolingual WSD (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Source language


 * Word-sense disambiguation (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Source language

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:48, 21 September 2012 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Word Sense Induction and Disambiguation task
Hello, Alvations,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Word Sense Induction and Disambiguation task should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Articles for deletion/Word Sense Induction and Disambiguation task.

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, Batard0 (talk) 12:40, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Multilingual and Crosslingual WSD
Hello, Alvations,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Multilingual and Crosslingual WSD should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Articles for deletion/Multilingual and Crosslingual WSD.

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, Batard0 (talk) 12:44, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 1
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited DELPH-IN, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Corpora (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:04, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

@DPL, thanks for the note. I've redirected the link to the specific page, i.e. Text_corpus, instead of the disambiguation page

Disambiguation link notification for August 8
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of The Noose episodes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Noose (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:34, 8 August 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for noticing. Fixed the link to the intended wiki page. =)

Speedy deletion nomination of Casarecce
Hello Alvations,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Casarecce for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. ubiquity (talk) 19:58, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:23, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:TranslationTechGroup


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. A tag has been placed on User:TranslationTechGroup requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:44, 8 May 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:TranslationTechGroup


A tag has been placed on your user page, User:TranslationTechGroup, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be advertising which only promotes or publicises someone or something. Promotional editing of any kind is not permitted, whether it be promotion of a person, company, product, group, service, belief, or anything else. This is a violation of our policies regarding acceptable use of user pages — user pages are intended for active editors of Wikipedia to communicate with one another as part of the process of creating encyclopedic content, and should not be mistaken for free webhosting resources or advertising space. Please read the guidelines on spam, the guidelines on user pages, and, especially, our FAQ for Organizations.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:45, 8 May 2022 (UTC)