User talk:AlwaysOnion

Archives
1 - Archive 1

Other pages
User:AlwaysOnion/Pages to create or fix User:AlwaysOnion/Vladimir Zografski

AlwaysOnion/Sandbox
I have moved this page out of the article namespace to User:AlwaysOnion/Sandbox as the name clearly shows that this is your personal sandbox page. --Allen3 talk 17:20, 11 July 2008 (UTC)

What?
Now im autoblocked again. I think this user is the same Vandal on same IP as last time ago. AlwaysOnion (talk) 17:20, 11 July 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Marc Krauspenhaar
A tag has been placed on Marc Krauspenhaar requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Excirial ( Talk, Contribs ) 16:41, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

The article Mislinja jumping hill has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources which verify their content. If you can provide more information about this subject, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 19:52, 3 September 2008 (UTC)


 * No, really. We need more information.  Where is it?  What country?  Why is it notable?  Please read WP:STUB for more information. - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 19:59, 3 September 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Pascal Bodmer
A tag has been placed on Pascal Bodmer requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Paranormal Skeptic (talk) 13:56, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

David Lazzaroni
Sorry, when I deleted the article, all it said was "David Lazzaroni is an skijumper from france." I now see that you were trying to add additional content, and I've restored the article. In the future, you should have enough content in the article to show why the subject is notable before you post. Thanks, NawlinWiki (talk) 19:52, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

CfD nomination of Category:Very young skijumpers
Category:Very young skijumpers, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Good Ol’factory (talk) 07:47, 4 October 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Provodín
A tag has been placed on Provodín requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Skitzo (talk) 14:31, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Vladimir Zografski
A tag has been placed on Vladimir Zografski requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Bstone (talk) 16:38, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

Autoblocked again
Are you autoblocked again? —Wknight94 (talk) 19:40, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
 * BTW, you can write on your talk page even if you're blocked or autoblocked. —Wknight94 (talk) 03:27, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

No, i cant! AlwaysOnion (talk) 08:56, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
 * If that happens again, go to my user page, click "E-mail this user" and send me the message you're seeing. You're supposed to be able to edit your own talk page while blocked - that's why we have an unblock tag.  —Wknight94 (talk) 11:24, 15 October 2008 (UTC)

Right Now, My Email isnt working. But a computer expert will hopefully fix it today. AlwaysOnion (talk) 11:57, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Well I've gone ahead and given you WP:IPEXEMPT rights. Hopefully that will stop you from being autoblocked.  —Wknight94 (talk) 16:48, 15 October 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Vladimir Zografski
A tag has been placed on Vladimir Zografski, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. لenna vecia  19:57, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

Vladimir Zografski - Bulgarian Champion
Is the Article still non-notable when i have added that he is the Bulgarian champion 2005 and 2008? AlwaysOnion (talk) 10:19, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

Notability of Moto Boy
A tag has been placed on Moto Boy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. AndrewWTaylor (talk) 10:48, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Eagle Building in Liljeholmen, Stockholm, Sweden.JPG
Thank you for uploading Image:Eagle Building in Liljeholmen, Stockholm, Sweden.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 17:58, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

Eagle Building picture
There is no license on the image though. If you really did take the picture, you should place pd-author on it to indicate that you took the picture and you do not have a copyright on it. But since you want the page Eagle Building to be deleted, you can add db-author to the image. Since you want the article to be deleted, I would assume that you want the image deleted too? Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 18:03, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Moto Boy
A tag has been placed on Moto Boy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Paranormal Skeptic (talk) 14:49, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

Vladimir Zografski
Hello, this person may well pass WP:ATHLETE, but certainly didn't at the time of the AfD. Black Kite 17:17, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

Of course it did. It was the same information. AlwaysOnion (talk) 17:34, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

WP:AIV Reports: Just a tip
Thanks for reporting vandalism to WP:AIV. It seems all the users you reported were likely sockpuppets. However, for future reference, you need to put a short explanation in your posts on AIV if you expect the users to get blocked. The pace there is too breakneck for us to do much investigation on our own. So, just be sure to follow the advice on the header there when you report anyone else, okay? Thanks for your help, and good catch on the socks. Bullzeye (Ring for Service) 10:40, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

Yes, Thats Okey! Thank You AlwaysOnion (talk) 10:42, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

Sock question
Regarding your SSP, how did you connect and ? —Wknight94 (talk) 20:15, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Antonín Hájek
A tag has been placed on Antonín Hájek requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Computerwiz908 | Talk 20:07, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Kim-Roar Hansen


The article Kim-Roar Hansen has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Skiier that never placed on the podium or won a title and maxed out at 12th place, so we can't presume notability based on high achievement. No WP:GNG coverage located on a search. Long since retired so new coverage is unlikely to be generated. Only source currently is a database, which isn't enough WP:SIGCOV to retain the article."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 14:29, 19 June 2022 (UTC)