User talk:Alwyn Alšarifović Abubakarov

June 2019
Hello, I'm HueMan1. I noticed that you recently removed content from Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. hueman1 (talk)  02:56, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Hi, HueMan1. I see you noticed the removal of the Tagalog text in the Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao article, which I did due to the fact ethnic groups within said region do not speak it as their native language, and that retaining it in the article reinforces the unjust imposition of the language on its inhabitants. Having said that, I have reverted the article to when I last edited it, adding the edit summary this time. I appreciate the reminder, and because of that, I thank you for leaving a message on my talk page. — Alwyn Alšarifović Abubakarov (talk) 21:01, 4 June 2019 (UTC)


 * Hi, this is User:Hariboneagle927, I notice that you made the same edit for Bangsamoro. I've suspect this your reasoning above is the same for your edit on the Bangsamoro article which is understandable. Though as I said in the edit summary, it's one of the Filipino is one of the official languages of the country the region is a part of. Hariboneagle927 (talk) 15:08, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Also this goes the same for other non-Tagalog dominated areas such as in the Visayas and Northern Luzon.Hariboneagle927 (talk) 15:12, 11 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Hi, User:Hariboneagle927. I understand the basis of your statement stems from the provisions of the 1987 Constitution concerning the designation of official languages. However, regardless of how the language is termed in this particular document, "Filipino" is just Tagalog, only given another name to make the language palatable to non-Tagalog speakers, and to appeal to this fallacy of a standalone "Filipino language". Also to draw a parallel on my reasoning behind the edits, (Hindi) Hindustani is an official language of India and yet there are no Hindi texts on Wikipedia articles about non-Hindi speaking areas such as West Bengal and (especially) Tamil Nadu. — Alwyn Alšarifović Abubakarov (talk) 20:31, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Since its not only me who dispute the nature of your edits, I invite you to participate in Wikiproject Philippines' talk page. It would be helpful to raise your side there so the community could reach a consensus on how to deal with local names for Philippine place names. Depending on the outcome, a consensus may be reached to follow the same approach you noted used for Indian place names or maintain the status quo.Hariboneagle927 (talk) 05:04, 15 June 2019 (UTC)