User talk:Alyson camus

Your submission at Articles for creation: Draft:Rock NYC (September 7)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:Alyson_camus Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Tokyogirl79&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:Alyson_camus reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   14:34, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

Draft:Rock NYC concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Rock NYC, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:33, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Rock NYC


Hello, Alyson camus. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Rock NYC".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by one of two methods (don't do both): 1) follow the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13, or 2) copy this code:, paste it in the edit box at this link , and click "Save page". An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 04:00, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, Alyson camus. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the article Elliott Smith, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, please:


 * avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your circle, your organization, its competitors, projects or products;
 * instead propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the request edit template);
 * when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
 * avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
 * exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 01:54, 4 March 2016 (UTC)


 * So If someone else contributes to this page and includes a reference to my site it would be fine? I don't see where the conflict of interest is, I am not selling anything, I am not receiving any money when people visit my site, I do not get any financial benefit... how is this a COI? the user who edited me out is wrong, I don't have a vendetta against Jennifer Chiba, I expose the facts. I have proof that the official story is false. Why is my research not relevant as this user wrote? please explain this to me. Alyson camus (talk) 02:27, 4 March 2016 (UTC)


 * The conflict of interest is not based on you getting money; it can be as simple as a real life connection to or vested interest in the topic. You have a vested interest in a certain point of view, so it is a conflict of interest to push that view. Somebody else could cite your blog but in many cases, a blog is not considered a reliable source. Worse yet, per WP:BLPSPS, a blog cannot be used when there are living persons such as Chiba who are being attacked in the blog. Binksternet (talk) 05:55, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

This is ridiculous because Liam Gowing (for example) is abundantly quoted on this same page because of his article in Spin. But I know for a fact that Gowing is a good friend of Chiba, talk about a COI! but since he is defending her, that's fine I guess. everybody who has written about the case has had an agenda... nobody is objective, and I know too much about this case to stay quiet, but I guess what I have to say is way too much for PC Wikipedia. I would even add that Chiba herself has edited parts of the page, at least this is what she said! Alyson camus (talk) 15:05, 4 March 2016 (UTC)