User talk:Alyssa-Burley

Everything looks good, Alyssa! J.R. Council (talk) 21:00, 24 January 2018 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello, Alyssa-Burley, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Ian and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 13:17, 26 January 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia project possibilities
Hi, guys! This is the section where we can post about potential articles for our project! Triscuitchan (talk) 19:37, 6 February 2018 (UTC) Triscuitchan (talk) 19:37, 6 February 2018 (UTC)

The article for Eleanor Gamble is pretty sparse, so we might be able to work on her. There is a small excerpt about her in our textbook as well. Triscuitchan (talk) 19:43, 6 February 2018 (UTC)


 * Eleanor Gamble sounds like a great choice. I also wouldn't mind working on Rorschach either. Paccob (talk) 21:55, 6 February 2018 (UTC)

I like the idea of Eleanor Gamble's article, my only worry with working on Rorschach's page is that others in our class may ask to do the same pageAlyssa-Burley (talk) 01:09, 7 February 2018 (UTC)


 * What about Harlene Anderson? Her page is pretty sparse as well and she was involved in some cool work and she's a motivational speaker now. I think Eleanor Gamble would be a really good choice though so it's up to you guys. Also, I don't know if i want to be bothered by the infamous martinevans on Rorschach's page, he might be a jerk about our edits and there's more room for adding to the pages of Gamble and Anderson Alyssa-Burley (talk) 01:23, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

After reading the talk page of Rorschach’s article, I’d rather stay away from that particular task. I think we’d risk dealing with martinevans123 and having him delete and revert edits that we add. Triscuitchan (talk) 01:48, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

I’d be okay with either Gamble or Anderson. Let’s wait for Katie to weigh in and see what she’s thinking. Triscuitchan (talk) 01:50, 7 February 2018 (UTC)


 * I agree with all of the above, lets hear from everyone and I'll email him tomorrow once we decide. I think we are supposed to have a backup in case someone else wants to do the same one so it's probably good to have more than one option for ourselves Alyssa-Burley (talk) 01:57, 7 February 2018 (UTC)


 * I already forgot about that martinevans guy - you guys are probably right in steering clear of that! With needing a backup in mind, I'd say we could try for either Gamble or Anderson; they both look like good articles to improve on. Paccob (talk) 03:48, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

I’d be okay with using both; one as our 1st choice and one as a backup. Triscuitchan (talk) 16:45, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

In class another group said that they choose to work with Rorschach anyway, but I like Eleanor Gamble, she sound interesting and I feel weird writing about someone still alive. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Katester06 (talk • contribs) 19:20, 7 February 2018 (UTC) Katester06 (talk) 19:06, 21 February 2018 (UTC)Katester06

Your topic
Hi Group 3 - I think Eleanor Gamble is a good choice. It should not be hard to significantly develop this article. J.R. Council (talk) 22:16, 14 February 2018 (UTC)J.R. Council (talk) 21:36, 20 February 2018 (UTC)