User talk:Alyssa.Alfonso/Evaluate an Article

Lead section: The lead includes an introductory sentence that clearly and concisely describes the article's topic. The lead is brief and barely there. The article gets straight to the content. It begins with a definition that leads to the topic and main points of the article. The lead, however, does not include a brief description of the article's main sections. The lead stays on topic and does not include information not relevant in the article. The lead is concise with no irrelevant detail.

Content: The content of the article is relevant to the topic. The content remains up to date, and there is no missing content. The content stays on topic and does not include unnecessary information. This article deals with mathematics, specifically geometric algebra. The content is organized and in a logical order.

Tone and Balance: The article is neutral. There is no bias included in the article. The article is not depicting a certain viewpoint or opinion in any way. The article is not persuasive or argumentative. This is an informational and educational article.

Sources and References: The facts and information provided in the article are based on/backed up by many mathematicians and professionals. Reliable sources are used. The sources are both current and thorough. There are many scientific and mathematical sources used that are reliable. All links in the article work.

Organization and writing quality: The article is well written in a concise and clear way as far as the language used and the tone. There are no grammatical or spelling errors. The article is organized, yet looking at it is overwhelming. The structure is in paragraph form, but the article is an educational article about mathematics, which could make it hard for readers to process and understand the information. The article is organized based on the breakdown of the topic, but paragraph form for an educational mathematics article usually is not the best way to deliver mathematical material.

Images and Media: The article includes images that enhance the understanding of the topics being discussed. The images depict graphs, shapes, formulas, etc. The images are well-captioned with a description of what the images are showing. The images follow Wikipedia's regulations and they are laid put in a visually appealing way. The images provided help to break down some of the information provided in paragraph form.

Talk page discussion: There does not appear to be any behind the scenes conversations about this topic. The article is strictly there to deliver mathematical content. The article is not part of a WikiProject. The article is informational. Wiki discusses this topic in a very educational and professional way. There is no tone, bias, opinion, etc in this article.

Overall impressions: This article is, again, an informational and educational article that was created to teach/explain a topic. The article is successful in explaining a topic and breaking it down for the audience. The format/structure of the article can be improved by separating the paragraphs to make it easier for the audience to process and read. Overall, I would say that the article is well developed. As a math teacher, I would consider this to be a reliable source. Alyssa.Alfonso (talk) 15:32, 27 January 2023 (UTC) Alyssa Alfonso