User talk:Alyssa5589

Paul Piticoo
Hi Alyssa, please read carefully the wikipedia guidelines on writing a biographical article including using reliable sources, as the content you have re-added to this article does not follow the correct formatting, and has included unsourced content as well as information that does not belong in the lead section. If there are specific things you think are incorrect in the article, perhaps the best thing to do is name them on the talk page or ask others for help, as simply restoring content that was added by an editor with a conflict of interest makes it appear that perhaps you may also have a conflict. Thanks Melcous (talk)

October 2015
Hello, I'm I dream of horses. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Paul Piticco— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding to your message. $(talk to me) (contributions)$ @ 22:08, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

Please do not simply revert constructive changes made by other editors without giving reasons as you did at Paul Piticco. Your edit reintroduced formatting and punctuation errors into the article, as well as promotional content. If you feel there are specific issues with the article, please discuss them on the talk page. Thank you Melcous (talk) 06:42, 8 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Thanks for your message. As you work for Paul Piticco, you have a conflict of interest in editing this article so you should read the relevant guidelines carefully. The best thing for you to do is say on the talk page what you think are the problems and need to be changed. For starters, is there anything currently in the article that is incorrect? Wikipedia articles should be written from neutral point of view and they are not to be promotional, so the comments and details I have removed are because they seem designed to promote various entities associated with the subject of the article or remove content that is not thought to be flattering, which is not how encyclopedias work. Thanks Melcous (talk) 07:05, 8 October 2015 (UTC)