User talk:Am2t

Numeric film
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Numeric film, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add  to the top of Numeric film. Taemyr (talk) 09:58, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

I have proposed Numeric film for deletion because current consensus is that wikipedia is not a dictionary, so our articles should aim at being more than simply a definition of the term. Note also that very new terms, or terms that have very little circulation, is seens as particulary troublesome. The releveant guidelines are WP:Dicdef and WP:Neologism. Taemyr (talk) 09:58, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

Highly cototient number
Regarding, how do you think it contradicts itself? PrimeHunter (talk) 13:26, 12 April 2008 (UTC)